Cargando…

Challenges and opportunities of a paperless baseline survey in Sri Lanka

BACKGROUND: Personal digital assistants (PDAs) have been shown to reduce costs associated with survey implementation and digitisation, and to improve data quality when compared to traditional paper based data collection. Few studies, however, have shared their experiences of the use of these devices...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knipe, Duleeka W, Pearson, Melissa, Borgstrøm, Rasmus, Pieris, Ravi, Weerasinghe, Manjula, Priyadarshana, Chamil, Eddleston, Michael, Gunnell, David, Metcalfe, Chris, Konradsen, Flemming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25027231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-452
_version_ 1782328872053768192
author Knipe, Duleeka W
Pearson, Melissa
Borgstrøm, Rasmus
Pieris, Ravi
Weerasinghe, Manjula
Priyadarshana, Chamil
Eddleston, Michael
Gunnell, David
Metcalfe, Chris
Konradsen, Flemming
author_facet Knipe, Duleeka W
Pearson, Melissa
Borgstrøm, Rasmus
Pieris, Ravi
Weerasinghe, Manjula
Priyadarshana, Chamil
Eddleston, Michael
Gunnell, David
Metcalfe, Chris
Konradsen, Flemming
author_sort Knipe, Duleeka W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Personal digital assistants (PDAs) have been shown to reduce costs associated with survey implementation and digitisation, and to improve data quality when compared to traditional paper based data collection. Few studies, however, have shared their experiences of the use of these devices in rural settings in Asia. This paper reports on our experiences of using a PDA device for data collection in Sri Lanka as part of a large cluster randomised control trial. FINDINGS: We found that PDAs were useful for collecting data for a baseline survey of a large randomised control trial (54,000 households). We found that the PDA device and survey format was easy to use by inexperienced field staff, even though the survey was programmed in English. The device enabled the rapid digitisation of survey data, providing a good basis for continuous data quality assurance, supervision of staff and survey implementation. An unexpected advantage was the improved community opinion of the research project as a result of the device, because the use of the technology gave data collectors an elevated status amongst the community. In addition the global positioning system (GPS) functionality of the device allowed precise mapping of households, and hence distinct settlements to be identified as randomisation clusters. Future users should be mindful that to save costs the piloting should be completed before programming. In addition consideration of a local after-care service is important to avoid costs and time delays associated with sending devices back to overseas providers. DISCUSSION: Since the start of this study, PDA devices have rapidly developed and are increasingly used. The use of PDA or similar devices for research is not without its problems; however we believe that the universal lessons learnt as part of this study are even more important for the effective utilisation of these rapidly developing technologies in resource poor settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4118630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41186302014-08-02 Challenges and opportunities of a paperless baseline survey in Sri Lanka Knipe, Duleeka W Pearson, Melissa Borgstrøm, Rasmus Pieris, Ravi Weerasinghe, Manjula Priyadarshana, Chamil Eddleston, Michael Gunnell, David Metcalfe, Chris Konradsen, Flemming BMC Res Notes Project Note BACKGROUND: Personal digital assistants (PDAs) have been shown to reduce costs associated with survey implementation and digitisation, and to improve data quality when compared to traditional paper based data collection. Few studies, however, have shared their experiences of the use of these devices in rural settings in Asia. This paper reports on our experiences of using a PDA device for data collection in Sri Lanka as part of a large cluster randomised control trial. FINDINGS: We found that PDAs were useful for collecting data for a baseline survey of a large randomised control trial (54,000 households). We found that the PDA device and survey format was easy to use by inexperienced field staff, even though the survey was programmed in English. The device enabled the rapid digitisation of survey data, providing a good basis for continuous data quality assurance, supervision of staff and survey implementation. An unexpected advantage was the improved community opinion of the research project as a result of the device, because the use of the technology gave data collectors an elevated status amongst the community. In addition the global positioning system (GPS) functionality of the device allowed precise mapping of households, and hence distinct settlements to be identified as randomisation clusters. Future users should be mindful that to save costs the piloting should be completed before programming. In addition consideration of a local after-care service is important to avoid costs and time delays associated with sending devices back to overseas providers. DISCUSSION: Since the start of this study, PDA devices have rapidly developed and are increasingly used. The use of PDA or similar devices for research is not without its problems; however we believe that the universal lessons learnt as part of this study are even more important for the effective utilisation of these rapidly developing technologies in resource poor settings. BioMed Central 2014-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4118630/ /pubmed/25027231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-452 Text en Copyright © 2014 Knipe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Project Note
Knipe, Duleeka W
Pearson, Melissa
Borgstrøm, Rasmus
Pieris, Ravi
Weerasinghe, Manjula
Priyadarshana, Chamil
Eddleston, Michael
Gunnell, David
Metcalfe, Chris
Konradsen, Flemming
Challenges and opportunities of a paperless baseline survey in Sri Lanka
title Challenges and opportunities of a paperless baseline survey in Sri Lanka
title_full Challenges and opportunities of a paperless baseline survey in Sri Lanka
title_fullStr Challenges and opportunities of a paperless baseline survey in Sri Lanka
title_full_unstemmed Challenges and opportunities of a paperless baseline survey in Sri Lanka
title_short Challenges and opportunities of a paperless baseline survey in Sri Lanka
title_sort challenges and opportunities of a paperless baseline survey in sri lanka
topic Project Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25027231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-452
work_keys_str_mv AT knipeduleekaw challengesandopportunitiesofapaperlessbaselinesurveyinsrilanka
AT pearsonmelissa challengesandopportunitiesofapaperlessbaselinesurveyinsrilanka
AT borgstrømrasmus challengesandopportunitiesofapaperlessbaselinesurveyinsrilanka
AT pierisravi challengesandopportunitiesofapaperlessbaselinesurveyinsrilanka
AT weerasinghemanjula challengesandopportunitiesofapaperlessbaselinesurveyinsrilanka
AT priyadarshanachamil challengesandopportunitiesofapaperlessbaselinesurveyinsrilanka
AT eddlestonmichael challengesandopportunitiesofapaperlessbaselinesurveyinsrilanka
AT gunnelldavid challengesandopportunitiesofapaperlessbaselinesurveyinsrilanka
AT metcalfechris challengesandopportunitiesofapaperlessbaselinesurveyinsrilanka
AT konradsenflemming challengesandopportunitiesofapaperlessbaselinesurveyinsrilanka