Cargando…
How Much Is the Whole Really More than the Sum of Its Parts? 1 ⊞ 1 = 2.5: Superlinear Productivity in Collective Group Actions
In a variety of open source software projects, we document a superlinear growth of production intensity ([Image: see text]) as a function of the number of active developers [Image: see text], with a median value of the exponent [Image: see text], with large dispersions of [Image: see text] from slig...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25084157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103023 |
_version_ | 1782328893167894528 |
---|---|
author | Sornette, Didier Maillart, Thomas Ghezzi, Giacomo |
author_facet | Sornette, Didier Maillart, Thomas Ghezzi, Giacomo |
author_sort | Sornette, Didier |
collection | PubMed |
description | In a variety of open source software projects, we document a superlinear growth of production intensity ([Image: see text]) as a function of the number of active developers [Image: see text], with a median value of the exponent [Image: see text], with large dispersions of [Image: see text] from slightly less than [Image: see text] up to [Image: see text]. For a typical project in this class, doubling of the group size multiplies typically the output by a factor [Image: see text], explaining the title. This superlinear law is found to hold for group sizes ranging from 5 to a few hundred developers. We propose two classes of mechanisms, interaction-based and large deviation, along with a cascade model of productive activity, which unifies them. In this common framework, superlinear productivity requires that the involved social groups function at or close to criticality, or in a “superradiance” mode, in the sense of the appearance of a cooperative process and order involving a collective mode of developers defined by the build up of correlation between the contributions of developers. In addition, we report the first empirical test of the renormalization of the exponent of the distribution of the sizes of first generation events into the renormalized exponent of the distribution of clusters resulting from the cascade of triggering over all generation in a critical branching process in the non-meanfield regime. Finally, we document a size effect in the strength and variability of the superlinear effect, with smaller groups exhibiting widely distributed superlinear exponents, some of them characterizing highly productive teams. In contrast, large groups tend to have a smaller superlinearity and less variability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4118854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41188542014-08-04 How Much Is the Whole Really More than the Sum of Its Parts? 1 ⊞ 1 = 2.5: Superlinear Productivity in Collective Group Actions Sornette, Didier Maillart, Thomas Ghezzi, Giacomo PLoS One Research Article In a variety of open source software projects, we document a superlinear growth of production intensity ([Image: see text]) as a function of the number of active developers [Image: see text], with a median value of the exponent [Image: see text], with large dispersions of [Image: see text] from slightly less than [Image: see text] up to [Image: see text]. For a typical project in this class, doubling of the group size multiplies typically the output by a factor [Image: see text], explaining the title. This superlinear law is found to hold for group sizes ranging from 5 to a few hundred developers. We propose two classes of mechanisms, interaction-based and large deviation, along with a cascade model of productive activity, which unifies them. In this common framework, superlinear productivity requires that the involved social groups function at or close to criticality, or in a “superradiance” mode, in the sense of the appearance of a cooperative process and order involving a collective mode of developers defined by the build up of correlation between the contributions of developers. In addition, we report the first empirical test of the renormalization of the exponent of the distribution of the sizes of first generation events into the renormalized exponent of the distribution of clusters resulting from the cascade of triggering over all generation in a critical branching process in the non-meanfield regime. Finally, we document a size effect in the strength and variability of the superlinear effect, with smaller groups exhibiting widely distributed superlinear exponents, some of them characterizing highly productive teams. In contrast, large groups tend to have a smaller superlinearity and less variability. Public Library of Science 2014-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4118854/ /pubmed/25084157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103023 Text en © 2014 Sornette et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sornette, Didier Maillart, Thomas Ghezzi, Giacomo How Much Is the Whole Really More than the Sum of Its Parts? 1 ⊞ 1 = 2.5: Superlinear Productivity in Collective Group Actions |
title | How Much Is the Whole Really More than the Sum of Its Parts? 1 ⊞ 1 = 2.5: Superlinear Productivity in Collective Group Actions |
title_full | How Much Is the Whole Really More than the Sum of Its Parts? 1 ⊞ 1 = 2.5: Superlinear Productivity in Collective Group Actions |
title_fullStr | How Much Is the Whole Really More than the Sum of Its Parts? 1 ⊞ 1 = 2.5: Superlinear Productivity in Collective Group Actions |
title_full_unstemmed | How Much Is the Whole Really More than the Sum of Its Parts? 1 ⊞ 1 = 2.5: Superlinear Productivity in Collective Group Actions |
title_short | How Much Is the Whole Really More than the Sum of Its Parts? 1 ⊞ 1 = 2.5: Superlinear Productivity in Collective Group Actions |
title_sort | how much is the whole really more than the sum of its parts? 1 ⊞ 1 = 2.5: superlinear productivity in collective group actions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25084157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sornettedidier howmuchisthewholereallymorethanthesumofitsparts1125superlinearproductivityincollectivegroupactions AT maillartthomas howmuchisthewholereallymorethanthesumofitsparts1125superlinearproductivityincollectivegroupactions AT ghezzigiacomo howmuchisthewholereallymorethanthesumofitsparts1125superlinearproductivityincollectivegroupactions |