Cargando…
Eye Movements as an Index of Pathologist Visual Expertise: A Pilot Study
A pilot study examined the extent to which eye movements occurring during interpretation of digitized breast biopsy whole slide images (WSI) can distinguish novice interpreters from experts, informing assessments of competency progression during training and across the physician-learning continuum....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25084012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103447 |
_version_ | 1782328897677819904 |
---|---|
author | Brunyé, Tad T. Carney, Patricia A. Allison, Kimberly H. Shapiro, Linda G. Weaver, Donald L. Elmore, Joann G. |
author_facet | Brunyé, Tad T. Carney, Patricia A. Allison, Kimberly H. Shapiro, Linda G. Weaver, Donald L. Elmore, Joann G. |
author_sort | Brunyé, Tad T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A pilot study examined the extent to which eye movements occurring during interpretation of digitized breast biopsy whole slide images (WSI) can distinguish novice interpreters from experts, informing assessments of competency progression during training and across the physician-learning continuum. A pathologist with fellowship training in breast pathology interpreted digital WSI of breast tissue and marked the region of highest diagnostic relevance (dROI). These same images were then evaluated using computer vision techniques to identify visually salient regions of interest (vROI) without diagnostic relevance. A non-invasive eye tracking system recorded pathologists’ (N = 7) visual behavior during image interpretation, and we measured differential viewing of vROIs versus dROIs according to their level of expertise. Pathologists with relatively low expertise in interpreting breast pathology were more likely to fixate on, and subsequently return to, diagnostically irrelevant vROIs relative to experts. Repeatedly fixating on the distracting vROI showed limited value in predicting diagnostic failure. These preliminary results suggest that eye movements occurring during digital slide interpretation can characterize expertise development by demonstrating differential attraction to diagnostically relevant versus visually distracting image regions. These results carry both theoretical implications and potential for monitoring and evaluating student progress and providing automated feedback and scanning guidance in educational settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4118873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41188732014-08-04 Eye Movements as an Index of Pathologist Visual Expertise: A Pilot Study Brunyé, Tad T. Carney, Patricia A. Allison, Kimberly H. Shapiro, Linda G. Weaver, Donald L. Elmore, Joann G. PLoS One Research Article A pilot study examined the extent to which eye movements occurring during interpretation of digitized breast biopsy whole slide images (WSI) can distinguish novice interpreters from experts, informing assessments of competency progression during training and across the physician-learning continuum. A pathologist with fellowship training in breast pathology interpreted digital WSI of breast tissue and marked the region of highest diagnostic relevance (dROI). These same images were then evaluated using computer vision techniques to identify visually salient regions of interest (vROI) without diagnostic relevance. A non-invasive eye tracking system recorded pathologists’ (N = 7) visual behavior during image interpretation, and we measured differential viewing of vROIs versus dROIs according to their level of expertise. Pathologists with relatively low expertise in interpreting breast pathology were more likely to fixate on, and subsequently return to, diagnostically irrelevant vROIs relative to experts. Repeatedly fixating on the distracting vROI showed limited value in predicting diagnostic failure. These preliminary results suggest that eye movements occurring during digital slide interpretation can characterize expertise development by demonstrating differential attraction to diagnostically relevant versus visually distracting image regions. These results carry both theoretical implications and potential for monitoring and evaluating student progress and providing automated feedback and scanning guidance in educational settings. Public Library of Science 2014-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4118873/ /pubmed/25084012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103447 Text en © 2014 Brunyé et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brunyé, Tad T. Carney, Patricia A. Allison, Kimberly H. Shapiro, Linda G. Weaver, Donald L. Elmore, Joann G. Eye Movements as an Index of Pathologist Visual Expertise: A Pilot Study |
title | Eye Movements as an Index of Pathologist Visual Expertise: A Pilot Study |
title_full | Eye Movements as an Index of Pathologist Visual Expertise: A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Eye Movements as an Index of Pathologist Visual Expertise: A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Eye Movements as an Index of Pathologist Visual Expertise: A Pilot Study |
title_short | Eye Movements as an Index of Pathologist Visual Expertise: A Pilot Study |
title_sort | eye movements as an index of pathologist visual expertise: a pilot study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25084012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103447 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunyetadt eyemovementsasanindexofpathologistvisualexpertiseapilotstudy AT carneypatriciaa eyemovementsasanindexofpathologistvisualexpertiseapilotstudy AT allisonkimberlyh eyemovementsasanindexofpathologistvisualexpertiseapilotstudy AT shapirolindag eyemovementsasanindexofpathologistvisualexpertiseapilotstudy AT weaverdonaldl eyemovementsasanindexofpathologistvisualexpertiseapilotstudy AT elmorejoanng eyemovementsasanindexofpathologistvisualexpertiseapilotstudy |