Cargando…

Materials and prognostic factors of bone regeneration in periapical surgery: A systematic review

Objectives: Analyse the effectiveness of different materials and techniques used in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) applied in periapical surgery, comparing the success rate obtained in 4-wall defects and in through-and-through bone lesions as well as to establish prognostic factors. Material and M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sánchez-Torres, Alba, Sánchez-Garcés, Maria Á, Gay-Escoda, Cosme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4119321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24608211
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19453
_version_ 1782328947922436096
author Sánchez-Torres, Alba
Sánchez-Garcés, Maria Á
Gay-Escoda, Cosme
author_facet Sánchez-Torres, Alba
Sánchez-Garcés, Maria Á
Gay-Escoda, Cosme
author_sort Sánchez-Torres, Alba
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Analyse the effectiveness of different materials and techniques used in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) applied in periapical surgery, comparing the success rate obtained in 4-wall defects and in through-and-through bone lesions as well as to establish prognostic factors. Material and Methods: A Cochrane, PubMed-MEDLINE and Scopus database search (October 2012 to March 2013) was conducted with the search terms “periapical surgery”, “surgical endodontic treatment”, “guided tissue regeneration”, “bone regeneration”, “bone grafts”, “barrier membranes” and “periapical lesions” individually and next, using the Boolean operator “AND”. The inclusion criteria were the use of GTR (bone graft and/or membrane barrier), clinical studies including at least 10 patients, 10 years aged articles published in English or French. The exclusion criteria were case reports and nonhuman studies. Results: 34 publications were selected from a total of 483. 9 of the 34 were excluded. Finally, the systematic review included 25 articles: 2 metaanalysis, 8 reviews, 13 prospective studies and 2 retrospective studies. They were stratified according to their level of scientific evidence using the SORT criteria. The 4-wall periapical and through-and-through lesions improve more their prognosis by combining bone grafts and barrier membranes than using these materials exclusively, respect to the control groups. The results show lower failure rates in 4-wall lesions than in through-and-through lesions using GTR. Conclusions: The combined GTR technique (filling material and membranes) obtains a greater success rate both in 4-wall lesions and in through-and-through lesions, respect to the control groups. The use of regeneration materials seems to be more necessary in through-and-through lesions,> 5mm lesions, lower teeth and apicomarginal lesions as they have the worst healing prognosis. In function of the articles scientific quality, a type B recommendation is given in favour to the use of GTR in association of periapical surgery in case of 4-wall and through-and-through lesions. Key words:Periapical surgery, surgical endodontic treatment, guided tissue regeneration, bone regeneration, bone grafts, barrier membranes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4119321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41193212014-08-14 Materials and prognostic factors of bone regeneration in periapical surgery: A systematic review Sánchez-Torres, Alba Sánchez-Garcés, Maria Á Gay-Escoda, Cosme Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Review Objectives: Analyse the effectiveness of different materials and techniques used in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) applied in periapical surgery, comparing the success rate obtained in 4-wall defects and in through-and-through bone lesions as well as to establish prognostic factors. Material and Methods: A Cochrane, PubMed-MEDLINE and Scopus database search (October 2012 to March 2013) was conducted with the search terms “periapical surgery”, “surgical endodontic treatment”, “guided tissue regeneration”, “bone regeneration”, “bone grafts”, “barrier membranes” and “periapical lesions” individually and next, using the Boolean operator “AND”. The inclusion criteria were the use of GTR (bone graft and/or membrane barrier), clinical studies including at least 10 patients, 10 years aged articles published in English or French. The exclusion criteria were case reports and nonhuman studies. Results: 34 publications were selected from a total of 483. 9 of the 34 were excluded. Finally, the systematic review included 25 articles: 2 metaanalysis, 8 reviews, 13 prospective studies and 2 retrospective studies. They were stratified according to their level of scientific evidence using the SORT criteria. The 4-wall periapical and through-and-through lesions improve more their prognosis by combining bone grafts and barrier membranes than using these materials exclusively, respect to the control groups. The results show lower failure rates in 4-wall lesions than in through-and-through lesions using GTR. Conclusions: The combined GTR technique (filling material and membranes) obtains a greater success rate both in 4-wall lesions and in through-and-through lesions, respect to the control groups. The use of regeneration materials seems to be more necessary in through-and-through lesions,> 5mm lesions, lower teeth and apicomarginal lesions as they have the worst healing prognosis. In function of the articles scientific quality, a type B recommendation is given in favour to the use of GTR in association of periapical surgery in case of 4-wall and through-and-through lesions. Key words:Periapical surgery, surgical endodontic treatment, guided tissue regeneration, bone regeneration, bone grafts, barrier membranes. Medicina Oral S.L. 2014-07 2014-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4119321/ /pubmed/24608211 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19453 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Sánchez-Torres, Alba
Sánchez-Garcés, Maria Á
Gay-Escoda, Cosme
Materials and prognostic factors of bone regeneration in periapical surgery: A systematic review
title Materials and prognostic factors of bone regeneration in periapical surgery: A systematic review
title_full Materials and prognostic factors of bone regeneration in periapical surgery: A systematic review
title_fullStr Materials and prognostic factors of bone regeneration in periapical surgery: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Materials and prognostic factors of bone regeneration in periapical surgery: A systematic review
title_short Materials and prognostic factors of bone regeneration in periapical surgery: A systematic review
title_sort materials and prognostic factors of bone regeneration in periapical surgery: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4119321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24608211
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19453
work_keys_str_mv AT sancheztorresalba materialsandprognosticfactorsofboneregenerationinperiapicalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT sanchezgarcesmariaa materialsandprognosticfactorsofboneregenerationinperiapicalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT gayescodacosme materialsandprognosticfactorsofboneregenerationinperiapicalsurgeryasystematicreview