Cargando…
Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast
BACKGROUND: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a variant of breast carcinoma with a higher propensity for lymph node metastases compared with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 636 IMPC and 297 735 IDC cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4119976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24921921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.301 |
_version_ | 1782329025247576064 |
---|---|
author | Chen, A C Paulino, A C Schwartz, M R Rodriguez, A A Bass, B L Chang, J C Teh, B S |
author_facet | Chen, A C Paulino, A C Schwartz, M R Rodriguez, A A Bass, B L Chang, J C Teh, B S |
author_sort | Chen, A C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a variant of breast carcinoma with a higher propensity for lymph node metastases compared with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 636 IMPC and 297 735 IDC cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database comparing disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) between IMPC and IDC. RESULTS: A higher percentage of IMPC cases (52.0%) had nodal metastases compared with IDC cases (34.6%). The 5-year DSS and OS for IMPC was 91.8% and 82.9%, respectively compared with 88.6% and 80.5% for IDC, respectively. For both IMPC and IDC, oestrogen-receptor positivity was associated with better survival, while having four or more positive lymph nodes or larger tumour size correlated with worse survival. Radiotherapy provided a survival benefit for both histological types. CONCLUSIONS: Despite IMPC's higher propensity for lymph node metastasis, IMPC has DSS and OS that compare favourably with IDC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4119976 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41199762015-07-29 Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast Chen, A C Paulino, A C Schwartz, M R Rodriguez, A A Bass, B L Chang, J C Teh, B S Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a variant of breast carcinoma with a higher propensity for lymph node metastases compared with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 636 IMPC and 297 735 IDC cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database comparing disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) between IMPC and IDC. RESULTS: A higher percentage of IMPC cases (52.0%) had nodal metastases compared with IDC cases (34.6%). The 5-year DSS and OS for IMPC was 91.8% and 82.9%, respectively compared with 88.6% and 80.5% for IDC, respectively. For both IMPC and IDC, oestrogen-receptor positivity was associated with better survival, while having four or more positive lymph nodes or larger tumour size correlated with worse survival. Radiotherapy provided a survival benefit for both histological types. CONCLUSIONS: Despite IMPC's higher propensity for lymph node metastasis, IMPC has DSS and OS that compare favourably with IDC. Nature Publishing Group 2014-07-29 2014-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4119976/ /pubmed/24921921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.301 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Chen, A C Paulino, A C Schwartz, M R Rodriguez, A A Bass, B L Chang, J C Teh, B S Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast |
title | Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast |
title_full | Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast |
title_fullStr | Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast |
title_full_unstemmed | Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast |
title_short | Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast |
title_sort | population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4119976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24921921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.301 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenac populationbasedcomparisonofprognosticfactorsininvasivemicropapillaryandinvasiveductalcarcinomaofthebreast AT paulinoac populationbasedcomparisonofprognosticfactorsininvasivemicropapillaryandinvasiveductalcarcinomaofthebreast AT schwartzmr populationbasedcomparisonofprognosticfactorsininvasivemicropapillaryandinvasiveductalcarcinomaofthebreast AT rodriguezaa populationbasedcomparisonofprognosticfactorsininvasivemicropapillaryandinvasiveductalcarcinomaofthebreast AT bassbl populationbasedcomparisonofprognosticfactorsininvasivemicropapillaryandinvasiveductalcarcinomaofthebreast AT changjc populationbasedcomparisonofprognosticfactorsininvasivemicropapillaryandinvasiveductalcarcinomaofthebreast AT tehbs populationbasedcomparisonofprognosticfactorsininvasivemicropapillaryandinvasiveductalcarcinomaofthebreast |