Cargando…

Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast

BACKGROUND: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a variant of breast carcinoma with a higher propensity for lymph node metastases compared with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 636 IMPC and 297 735 IDC cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, A C, Paulino, A C, Schwartz, M R, Rodriguez, A A, Bass, B L, Chang, J C, Teh, B S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4119976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24921921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.301
_version_ 1782329025247576064
author Chen, A C
Paulino, A C
Schwartz, M R
Rodriguez, A A
Bass, B L
Chang, J C
Teh, B S
author_facet Chen, A C
Paulino, A C
Schwartz, M R
Rodriguez, A A
Bass, B L
Chang, J C
Teh, B S
author_sort Chen, A C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a variant of breast carcinoma with a higher propensity for lymph node metastases compared with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 636 IMPC and 297 735 IDC cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database comparing disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) between IMPC and IDC. RESULTS: A higher percentage of IMPC cases (52.0%) had nodal metastases compared with IDC cases (34.6%). The 5-year DSS and OS for IMPC was 91.8% and 82.9%, respectively compared with 88.6% and 80.5% for IDC, respectively. For both IMPC and IDC, oestrogen-receptor positivity was associated with better survival, while having four or more positive lymph nodes or larger tumour size correlated with worse survival. Radiotherapy provided a survival benefit for both histological types. CONCLUSIONS: Despite IMPC's higher propensity for lymph node metastasis, IMPC has DSS and OS that compare favourably with IDC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4119976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41199762015-07-29 Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast Chen, A C Paulino, A C Schwartz, M R Rodriguez, A A Bass, B L Chang, J C Teh, B S Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a variant of breast carcinoma with a higher propensity for lymph node metastases compared with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 636 IMPC and 297 735 IDC cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database comparing disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) between IMPC and IDC. RESULTS: A higher percentage of IMPC cases (52.0%) had nodal metastases compared with IDC cases (34.6%). The 5-year DSS and OS for IMPC was 91.8% and 82.9%, respectively compared with 88.6% and 80.5% for IDC, respectively. For both IMPC and IDC, oestrogen-receptor positivity was associated with better survival, while having four or more positive lymph nodes or larger tumour size correlated with worse survival. Radiotherapy provided a survival benefit for both histological types. CONCLUSIONS: Despite IMPC's higher propensity for lymph node metastasis, IMPC has DSS and OS that compare favourably with IDC. Nature Publishing Group 2014-07-29 2014-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4119976/ /pubmed/24921921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.301 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Chen, A C
Paulino, A C
Schwartz, M R
Rodriguez, A A
Bass, B L
Chang, J C
Teh, B S
Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast
title Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast
title_full Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast
title_fullStr Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast
title_full_unstemmed Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast
title_short Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast
title_sort population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4119976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24921921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.301
work_keys_str_mv AT chenac populationbasedcomparisonofprognosticfactorsininvasivemicropapillaryandinvasiveductalcarcinomaofthebreast
AT paulinoac populationbasedcomparisonofprognosticfactorsininvasivemicropapillaryandinvasiveductalcarcinomaofthebreast
AT schwartzmr populationbasedcomparisonofprognosticfactorsininvasivemicropapillaryandinvasiveductalcarcinomaofthebreast
AT rodriguezaa populationbasedcomparisonofprognosticfactorsininvasivemicropapillaryandinvasiveductalcarcinomaofthebreast
AT bassbl populationbasedcomparisonofprognosticfactorsininvasivemicropapillaryandinvasiveductalcarcinomaofthebreast
AT changjc populationbasedcomparisonofprognosticfactorsininvasivemicropapillaryandinvasiveductalcarcinomaofthebreast
AT tehbs populationbasedcomparisonofprognosticfactorsininvasivemicropapillaryandinvasiveductalcarcinomaofthebreast