Cargando…

Possible pro-carcinogenic association of endotoxin on lung cancer among Shanghai women textile workers

BACKGROUND: Endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide) is a widespread contaminant in many environmental settings. Since the 1970s, there has been generally consistent evidence indicating reduced risks for lung cancer associated with occupational endotoxin exposure. METHODS: We updated a case–cohort study neste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Checkoway, H, Lundin, J I, Costello, S, Ray, R, Li, W, Eisen, E A, Astrakianakis, G, Seixas, N, Applebaum, K, Gao, D L, Thomas, D B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4119981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24921918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.308
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide) is a widespread contaminant in many environmental settings. Since the 1970s, there has been generally consistent evidence indicating reduced risks for lung cancer associated with occupational endotoxin exposure. METHODS: We updated a case–cohort study nested within a cohort of 267 400 female textile workers in Shanghai, China. We compared exposure histories of 1456 incident lung cancers cases diagnosed during 1989–2006 with those of a reference subcohort of 3022 workers who were free of lung cancer at the end of follow-up. We applied Cox proportional hazards modelling to estimate exposure–response trends, adjusted for age and smoking, for cumulative exposures lagged by 0, 10, and 20 years, and separately for time windows of ⩽15 and >15 years since first exposure. RESULTS: We observed no associations between cumulative exposure and lung cancer, irrespective of lag interval. In contrast, analyses by exposure time windows revealed modestly elevated, but not statistically significant relative risks (∼1.27) at the highest three exposure quintiles for exposures that occurred >15 years since first exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The findings do not support a protective effect of endotoxin, but are suggestive of possible lung cancer promotion with increasing time since first exposure.