Cargando…

Novel training methods for robotic surgery

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this review are to summarize the current training modalities and assessment tools used in urological robotic surgery and to propose principles to guide the formation of a comprehensive robotics curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PUBMED database was systematically se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Andrew J., Aron, Monish, Hung, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4120223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097322
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.128506
_version_ 1782329055611191296
author Sun, Andrew J.
Aron, Monish
Hung, Andrew J.
author_facet Sun, Andrew J.
Aron, Monish
Hung, Andrew J.
author_sort Sun, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this review are to summarize the current training modalities and assessment tools used in urological robotic surgery and to propose principles to guide the formation of a comprehensive robotics curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PUBMED database was systematically searched for relevant articles and their citations utilized to broaden our search. These articles were reviewed and summarized with a focus on novel developments. RESULTS: A multitude of training modalities including didactic, dry lab, wet lab, and virtual reality have been developed. The use of these modalities can be divided into basic skills-based exercises and more advanced procedure-based exercises. Clinical training has largely followed traditional methods of surgical teaching with the exception of the unique development of tele-mentoring for the da Vinci interface. Tools to assess both real-life and simulator performance have been developed, including adaptions from Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery and Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill, and novel tools such as Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills. CONCLUSIONS: The use of these different entities to create a standardized curriculum for robotic surgery remains elusive. Selection of training modalities and assessment tools should be based upon performance data-based validity and practical feasibility. Comparative assessment of different modalities (cross-modality validity) can help strengthen the development of common skill sets. Constant data collection must occur to guide continuing curriculum improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4120223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41202232014-08-05 Novel training methods for robotic surgery Sun, Andrew J. Aron, Monish Hung, Andrew J. Indian J Urol Symposium OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this review are to summarize the current training modalities and assessment tools used in urological robotic surgery and to propose principles to guide the formation of a comprehensive robotics curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PUBMED database was systematically searched for relevant articles and their citations utilized to broaden our search. These articles were reviewed and summarized with a focus on novel developments. RESULTS: A multitude of training modalities including didactic, dry lab, wet lab, and virtual reality have been developed. The use of these modalities can be divided into basic skills-based exercises and more advanced procedure-based exercises. Clinical training has largely followed traditional methods of surgical teaching with the exception of the unique development of tele-mentoring for the da Vinci interface. Tools to assess both real-life and simulator performance have been developed, including adaptions from Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery and Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill, and novel tools such as Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills. CONCLUSIONS: The use of these different entities to create a standardized curriculum for robotic surgery remains elusive. Selection of training modalities and assessment tools should be based upon performance data-based validity and practical feasibility. Comparative assessment of different modalities (cross-modality validity) can help strengthen the development of common skill sets. Constant data collection must occur to guide continuing curriculum improvement. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4120223/ /pubmed/25097322 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.128506 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Symposium
Sun, Andrew J.
Aron, Monish
Hung, Andrew J.
Novel training methods for robotic surgery
title Novel training methods for robotic surgery
title_full Novel training methods for robotic surgery
title_fullStr Novel training methods for robotic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Novel training methods for robotic surgery
title_short Novel training methods for robotic surgery
title_sort novel training methods for robotic surgery
topic Symposium
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4120223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097322
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.128506
work_keys_str_mv AT sunandrewj noveltrainingmethodsforroboticsurgery
AT aronmonish noveltrainingmethodsforroboticsurgery
AT hungandrewj noveltrainingmethodsforroboticsurgery