Cargando…

Lateral Geniculate Body Evoked Potentials Elicited by Visual and Electrical Stimulation

PURPOSE: Blind individuals who have photoreceptor loss are known to perceive phosphenes with electrical stimulation of their remaining retinal ganglion cells. We proposed that implantable lateral geniculate body (LGB) stimulus electrode arrays could be used to generate phosphene vision. We attempted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Chang Wook, Kim, Pan Sang, Shin, Sun Ae, Yang, Ji Yeon, Yang, Yun Sik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4120355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25120343
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2014.28.4.337
_version_ 1782329074060886016
author Choi, Chang Wook
Kim, Pan Sang
Shin, Sun Ae
Yang, Ji Yeon
Yang, Yun Sik
author_facet Choi, Chang Wook
Kim, Pan Sang
Shin, Sun Ae
Yang, Ji Yeon
Yang, Yun Sik
author_sort Choi, Chang Wook
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Blind individuals who have photoreceptor loss are known to perceive phosphenes with electrical stimulation of their remaining retinal ganglion cells. We proposed that implantable lateral geniculate body (LGB) stimulus electrode arrays could be used to generate phosphene vision. We attempted to refine the basic reference of the electrical evoked potentials (EEPs) elicited by microelectrical stimulations of the optic nerve, optic tract and LGB of a domestic pig, and then compared it to visual evoked potentials (VEPs) elicited by short-flash stimuli. METHODS: For visual function measurement, VEPs in response to short-flash stimuli on the left eye of the domestic pig were assessed over the visual cortex at position Oz with the reference electrode at Fz. After anesthesia, linearly configured platinum wire electrodes were inserted into the optic nerve, optic track and LGB. To determine the optimal stimulus current, EEPs were recorded repeatedly with controlling the pulse and power. The threshold of current and charge density to elicit EEPs at 0.3 ms pulse duration was about ±10 µA. RESULTS: Our experimental results showed that visual cortex activity can be effectively evoked by stimulation of the optic nerve, optic tract and LGB using penetrating electrodes. The latency of P1 was more shortened as the electrical stimulation was closer to LGB. The EEPs of two-channel in the visual cortex demonstrated a similar pattern with stimulation of different spots of the stimulating electrodes. We found that the LGB-stimulated EEP pattern was very similar to the simultaneously generated VEP on the control side, although implicit time deferred. CONCLUSIONS: EEPs and VEPs derived from visual-system stimulation were compared. The LGB-stimulated EEP wave demonstrated a similar pattern to the VEP waveform except implicit time, indicating prosthetic-based electrical stimulation of the LGB could be utilized for the blind to perceive vision of phosphenes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4120355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41203552014-08-12 Lateral Geniculate Body Evoked Potentials Elicited by Visual and Electrical Stimulation Choi, Chang Wook Kim, Pan Sang Shin, Sun Ae Yang, Ji Yeon Yang, Yun Sik Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: Blind individuals who have photoreceptor loss are known to perceive phosphenes with electrical stimulation of their remaining retinal ganglion cells. We proposed that implantable lateral geniculate body (LGB) stimulus electrode arrays could be used to generate phosphene vision. We attempted to refine the basic reference of the electrical evoked potentials (EEPs) elicited by microelectrical stimulations of the optic nerve, optic tract and LGB of a domestic pig, and then compared it to visual evoked potentials (VEPs) elicited by short-flash stimuli. METHODS: For visual function measurement, VEPs in response to short-flash stimuli on the left eye of the domestic pig were assessed over the visual cortex at position Oz with the reference electrode at Fz. After anesthesia, linearly configured platinum wire electrodes were inserted into the optic nerve, optic track and LGB. To determine the optimal stimulus current, EEPs were recorded repeatedly with controlling the pulse and power. The threshold of current and charge density to elicit EEPs at 0.3 ms pulse duration was about ±10 µA. RESULTS: Our experimental results showed that visual cortex activity can be effectively evoked by stimulation of the optic nerve, optic tract and LGB using penetrating electrodes. The latency of P1 was more shortened as the electrical stimulation was closer to LGB. The EEPs of two-channel in the visual cortex demonstrated a similar pattern with stimulation of different spots of the stimulating electrodes. We found that the LGB-stimulated EEP pattern was very similar to the simultaneously generated VEP on the control side, although implicit time deferred. CONCLUSIONS: EEPs and VEPs derived from visual-system stimulation were compared. The LGB-stimulated EEP wave demonstrated a similar pattern to the VEP waveform except implicit time, indicating prosthetic-based electrical stimulation of the LGB could be utilized for the blind to perceive vision of phosphenes. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2014-08 2014-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4120355/ /pubmed/25120343 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2014.28.4.337 Text en © 2014 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choi, Chang Wook
Kim, Pan Sang
Shin, Sun Ae
Yang, Ji Yeon
Yang, Yun Sik
Lateral Geniculate Body Evoked Potentials Elicited by Visual and Electrical Stimulation
title Lateral Geniculate Body Evoked Potentials Elicited by Visual and Electrical Stimulation
title_full Lateral Geniculate Body Evoked Potentials Elicited by Visual and Electrical Stimulation
title_fullStr Lateral Geniculate Body Evoked Potentials Elicited by Visual and Electrical Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Lateral Geniculate Body Evoked Potentials Elicited by Visual and Electrical Stimulation
title_short Lateral Geniculate Body Evoked Potentials Elicited by Visual and Electrical Stimulation
title_sort lateral geniculate body evoked potentials elicited by visual and electrical stimulation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4120355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25120343
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2014.28.4.337
work_keys_str_mv AT choichangwook lateralgeniculatebodyevokedpotentialselicitedbyvisualandelectricalstimulation
AT kimpansang lateralgeniculatebodyevokedpotentialselicitedbyvisualandelectricalstimulation
AT shinsunae lateralgeniculatebodyevokedpotentialselicitedbyvisualandelectricalstimulation
AT yangjiyeon lateralgeniculatebodyevokedpotentialselicitedbyvisualandelectricalstimulation
AT yangyunsik lateralgeniculatebodyevokedpotentialselicitedbyvisualandelectricalstimulation