Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing adverse event profile and tolerability of nicergoline

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety profile of nicergoline compared with placebo and other active agents from published randomised controlled trials. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of nicergoline compared with placebo and other active agents across various indications. DATA SOURCES: MEDLI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fioravanti, Mario, Nakashima, Taku, Xu, Jun, Garg, Amit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4120366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25079927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005090
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety profile of nicergoline compared with placebo and other active agents from published randomised controlled trials. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of nicergoline compared with placebo and other active agents across various indications. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Medline-in-process, Cochrane, EMBASE, EMBASE alerts, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Cochrane Methodology Register (CMR) for all the randomised controlled trials, open-label or blinded, in adults treated with nicergoline. Studies published until August 2013 were included. REVIEW METHOD: 29 studies were included for data extraction. The studies included in this review were majorly from European countries and mostly in cerebrovascular disease (n=15) and dementia (n=8). RESULTS: The treatment withdrawals were comparatively lower in the nicergoline group as compared with the placebo group (RR=0.92; 95% CI 0.7 to 1.21) and other active comparators (RR=0.45; 95% CI 0.10 to 1.95), but the difference was non-significant. Incidence of any adverse events (AEs) was slightly higher (RR=1.05; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.2) while incidence of serious AEs was lower (RR=0.85; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.45) in the nicergoline compared with placebo group. Frequency of anxiety was significantly lower in nicergoline as compared with placebo (p=0.01). Other AEs including diarrhoea, gastric upset, dizziness and drowsiness were less frequent in the nicergoline group when compared with placebo/active drugs, but the difference was non-significant. Frequency of hypotension and hot flushes was slightly higher in the nicergoline group but the difference was non-significant. None of the studies reported any incidence of fibrosis or ergotism with nicergoline treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Nicergoline is an ergot derivative, but its safety profile is better than other ergot derivatives like ergotamine and ergotoxine. This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that nicergoline has a good safety profile. None of the studies included in this systematic review reported any incidence of fibrosis or ergotism with nicergoline.