Cargando…
Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture in the Korean literature. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: We searched 12 Korean databases and 7 Korean journals to identify eligible RCTs of acupuncture published from 1996 t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4120411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25079926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005068 |
_version_ | 1782329082801815552 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Kun Hyung Kang, Jung Won Lee, Myeong Soo Lee, Jae-Dong |
author_facet | Kim, Kun Hyung Kang, Jung Won Lee, Myeong Soo Lee, Jae-Dong |
author_sort | Kim, Kun Hyung |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture in the Korean literature. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: We searched 12 Korean databases and 7 Korean journals to identify eligible RCTs of acupuncture published from 1996 to July 2011. We used the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist for parallel RCTs and the revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) to assess the quality of reporting in Korean RCTs. We compared the completeness of reporting of CONSORT and STRICTA items in RCTs published in two time periods (1996–2004 referred to as the early period and 2005–2011 referred to as the late period). RESULTS: We analysed 146 eligible RCTs using the CONSORT statement concerning RCTs of both needling and non-needling acupuncture and the STRICTA guidelines for 90 trials of needling acupuncture. Among the 103 RCTs in the late period, the proportion of RCTs that completely reported the CONSORT items of outcome definition (15.5%), sample size calculation (2.9%), randomisation (56%), allocation concealment (5.8%), implementation of allocation (11.7%), outcome assessor blinding (20.3%), flow of participants (25.2%), number of participants analysed (19.4%), ancillary analyses (0.0%), adverse events (24.3%), generalisability of findings (1.9%) and overall evidence (32.0%) remained small. Among the 61 RCTs of needling acupuncture in the late period, the STRICTA items of setting/context (24.6%) and practitioner background (27.9%) showed incomplete reporting. The completeness of reporting improved over time in several CONSORT and STRICTA items. CONCLUSIONS: The completeness of reporting of Korean RCTs of acupuncture was suboptimal according to the CONSORT and revised STRICTA statements. Trial authors and journal editors should use the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines for transparent reporting in Korean RCTs of acupuncture. The endorsement of the CONSORT and revised STRICTA statements in author instructions is also required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4120411 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41204112014-08-05 Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines Kim, Kun Hyung Kang, Jung Won Lee, Myeong Soo Lee, Jae-Dong BMJ Open Complementary Medicine OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture in the Korean literature. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: We searched 12 Korean databases and 7 Korean journals to identify eligible RCTs of acupuncture published from 1996 to July 2011. We used the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist for parallel RCTs and the revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) to assess the quality of reporting in Korean RCTs. We compared the completeness of reporting of CONSORT and STRICTA items in RCTs published in two time periods (1996–2004 referred to as the early period and 2005–2011 referred to as the late period). RESULTS: We analysed 146 eligible RCTs using the CONSORT statement concerning RCTs of both needling and non-needling acupuncture and the STRICTA guidelines for 90 trials of needling acupuncture. Among the 103 RCTs in the late period, the proportion of RCTs that completely reported the CONSORT items of outcome definition (15.5%), sample size calculation (2.9%), randomisation (56%), allocation concealment (5.8%), implementation of allocation (11.7%), outcome assessor blinding (20.3%), flow of participants (25.2%), number of participants analysed (19.4%), ancillary analyses (0.0%), adverse events (24.3%), generalisability of findings (1.9%) and overall evidence (32.0%) remained small. Among the 61 RCTs of needling acupuncture in the late period, the STRICTA items of setting/context (24.6%) and practitioner background (27.9%) showed incomplete reporting. The completeness of reporting improved over time in several CONSORT and STRICTA items. CONCLUSIONS: The completeness of reporting of Korean RCTs of acupuncture was suboptimal according to the CONSORT and revised STRICTA statements. Trial authors and journal editors should use the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines for transparent reporting in Korean RCTs of acupuncture. The endorsement of the CONSORT and revised STRICTA statements in author instructions is also required. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4120411/ /pubmed/25079926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005068 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Complementary Medicine Kim, Kun Hyung Kang, Jung Won Lee, Myeong Soo Lee, Jae-Dong Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines |
title | Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines |
title_full | Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines |
title_short | Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines |
title_sort | assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the korean literature using the consort statement and stricta guidelines |
topic | Complementary Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4120411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25079926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimkunhyung assessmentofthequalityofreportinginrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofacupunctureinthekoreanliteratureusingtheconsortstatementandstrictaguidelines AT kangjungwon assessmentofthequalityofreportinginrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofacupunctureinthekoreanliteratureusingtheconsortstatementandstrictaguidelines AT leemyeongsoo assessmentofthequalityofreportinginrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofacupunctureinthekoreanliteratureusingtheconsortstatementandstrictaguidelines AT leejaedong assessmentofthequalityofreportinginrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofacupunctureinthekoreanliteratureusingtheconsortstatementandstrictaguidelines |