Cargando…
Proactive and Reactive Stopping When Distracted: An Attentional Account
Performance in response inhibition paradigms is typically attributed to inhibitory control. Here we examined the idea that stopping may largely depend on the outcome of a sensory detection process. Subjects performed a speeded go task, but they were instructed to withhold their response when a visua...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4120704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24842070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036542 |
_version_ | 1782329133590642688 |
---|---|
author | Verbruggen, Frederick Stevens, Tobias Chambers, Christopher D. |
author_facet | Verbruggen, Frederick Stevens, Tobias Chambers, Christopher D. |
author_sort | Verbruggen, Frederick |
collection | PubMed |
description | Performance in response inhibition paradigms is typically attributed to inhibitory control. Here we examined the idea that stopping may largely depend on the outcome of a sensory detection process. Subjects performed a speeded go task, but they were instructed to withhold their response when a visual stop signal was presented. The stop signal could occur in the center of the screen or in the periphery. On half of the trials, perceptual distractors were presented throughout the trial. We found that these perceptual distractors impaired stopping, especially when stop signals could occur in the periphery. Furthermore, the effect of the distractors on going was smallest in the central stop-signal condition, medium in a condition in which no signals could occur, and largest in the condition in which stop signals could occur in the periphery. The results show that an important component of stopping is finding a balance between ignoring irrelevant information in the environment and monitoring for the occurrence of occasional stop signals. These findings highlight the importance of sensory detection processes when stopping and could shed new light on a range of phenomena and findings in the response inhibition literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4120704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | American Psychological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41207042014-08-04 Proactive and Reactive Stopping When Distracted: An Attentional Account Verbruggen, Frederick Stevens, Tobias Chambers, Christopher D. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform Observations Performance in response inhibition paradigms is typically attributed to inhibitory control. Here we examined the idea that stopping may largely depend on the outcome of a sensory detection process. Subjects performed a speeded go task, but they were instructed to withhold their response when a visual stop signal was presented. The stop signal could occur in the center of the screen or in the periphery. On half of the trials, perceptual distractors were presented throughout the trial. We found that these perceptual distractors impaired stopping, especially when stop signals could occur in the periphery. Furthermore, the effect of the distractors on going was smallest in the central stop-signal condition, medium in a condition in which no signals could occur, and largest in the condition in which stop signals could occur in the periphery. The results show that an important component of stopping is finding a balance between ignoring irrelevant information in the environment and monitoring for the occurrence of occasional stop signals. These findings highlight the importance of sensory detection processes when stopping and could shed new light on a range of phenomena and findings in the response inhibition literature. American Psychological Association 2014-05-19 2014-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4120704/ /pubmed/24842070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036542 Text en © 2014 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. |
spellingShingle | Observations Verbruggen, Frederick Stevens, Tobias Chambers, Christopher D. Proactive and Reactive Stopping When Distracted: An Attentional Account |
title | Proactive and Reactive Stopping When Distracted: An Attentional Account |
title_full | Proactive and Reactive Stopping When Distracted: An Attentional Account |
title_fullStr | Proactive and Reactive Stopping When Distracted: An Attentional Account |
title_full_unstemmed | Proactive and Reactive Stopping When Distracted: An Attentional Account |
title_short | Proactive and Reactive Stopping When Distracted: An Attentional Account |
title_sort | proactive and reactive stopping when distracted: an attentional account |
topic | Observations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4120704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24842070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036542 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verbruggenfrederick proactiveandreactivestoppingwhendistractedanattentionalaccount AT stevenstobias proactiveandreactivestoppingwhendistractedanattentionalaccount AT chamberschristopherd proactiveandreactivestoppingwhendistractedanattentionalaccount |