Cargando…

Does Consolidation of Visuospatial Sequence Knowledge Depend on Eye Movements?

In the current study, we assessed whether visuospatial sequence knowledge is retained over 24 hours and whether this retention is dependent on the occurrence of eye movements. Participants performed two sessions of a serial reaction time (SRT) task in which they had to manually react to the identity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coomans, Daphné, Vandenbossche, Jochen, Homblé, Koen, Van den Bussche, Eva, Soetens, Eric, Deroost, Natacha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4121143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25089701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103421
_version_ 1782329178365886464
author Coomans, Daphné
Vandenbossche, Jochen
Homblé, Koen
Van den Bussche, Eva
Soetens, Eric
Deroost, Natacha
author_facet Coomans, Daphné
Vandenbossche, Jochen
Homblé, Koen
Van den Bussche, Eva
Soetens, Eric
Deroost, Natacha
author_sort Coomans, Daphné
collection PubMed
description In the current study, we assessed whether visuospatial sequence knowledge is retained over 24 hours and whether this retention is dependent on the occurrence of eye movements. Participants performed two sessions of a serial reaction time (SRT) task in which they had to manually react to the identity of a target letter pair presented in one of four locations around a fixation cross. When the letter pair ‘XO’ was presented, a left response had to be given, when the letter pair ‘OX’ was presented, a right response was required. In the Eye Movements (EM) condition, eye movements were necessary to perform the task since the fixation cross and the target were separated by at least 9° visual angle. In the No Eye Movements (NEM) condition, on the other hand, eye movements were minimized by keeping the distance from the fixation cross to the target below 1° visual angle and by limiting the stimulus presentation to 100 ms. Since the target identity changed randomly in both conditions, no manual response sequence was present in the task. However, target location was structured according to a deterministic sequence in both the EM and NEM condition. Learning of the target location sequence was determined at the end of the first session and 24 hours after initial learning. Results indicated that the sequence learning effect in the SRT task diminished, yet remained significant, over the 24 hour interval in both conditions. Importantly, the difference in eye movements had no impact on the transfer of sequence knowledge. These results suggest that the retention of visuospatial sequence knowledge occurs alike, irrespective of whether this knowledge is supported by eye movements or not.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4121143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41211432014-08-05 Does Consolidation of Visuospatial Sequence Knowledge Depend on Eye Movements? Coomans, Daphné Vandenbossche, Jochen Homblé, Koen Van den Bussche, Eva Soetens, Eric Deroost, Natacha PLoS One Research Article In the current study, we assessed whether visuospatial sequence knowledge is retained over 24 hours and whether this retention is dependent on the occurrence of eye movements. Participants performed two sessions of a serial reaction time (SRT) task in which they had to manually react to the identity of a target letter pair presented in one of four locations around a fixation cross. When the letter pair ‘XO’ was presented, a left response had to be given, when the letter pair ‘OX’ was presented, a right response was required. In the Eye Movements (EM) condition, eye movements were necessary to perform the task since the fixation cross and the target were separated by at least 9° visual angle. In the No Eye Movements (NEM) condition, on the other hand, eye movements were minimized by keeping the distance from the fixation cross to the target below 1° visual angle and by limiting the stimulus presentation to 100 ms. Since the target identity changed randomly in both conditions, no manual response sequence was present in the task. However, target location was structured according to a deterministic sequence in both the EM and NEM condition. Learning of the target location sequence was determined at the end of the first session and 24 hours after initial learning. Results indicated that the sequence learning effect in the SRT task diminished, yet remained significant, over the 24 hour interval in both conditions. Importantly, the difference in eye movements had no impact on the transfer of sequence knowledge. These results suggest that the retention of visuospatial sequence knowledge occurs alike, irrespective of whether this knowledge is supported by eye movements or not. Public Library of Science 2014-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4121143/ /pubmed/25089701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103421 Text en © 2014 Coomans et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Coomans, Daphné
Vandenbossche, Jochen
Homblé, Koen
Van den Bussche, Eva
Soetens, Eric
Deroost, Natacha
Does Consolidation of Visuospatial Sequence Knowledge Depend on Eye Movements?
title Does Consolidation of Visuospatial Sequence Knowledge Depend on Eye Movements?
title_full Does Consolidation of Visuospatial Sequence Knowledge Depend on Eye Movements?
title_fullStr Does Consolidation of Visuospatial Sequence Knowledge Depend on Eye Movements?
title_full_unstemmed Does Consolidation of Visuospatial Sequence Knowledge Depend on Eye Movements?
title_short Does Consolidation of Visuospatial Sequence Knowledge Depend on Eye Movements?
title_sort does consolidation of visuospatial sequence knowledge depend on eye movements?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4121143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25089701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103421
work_keys_str_mv AT coomansdaphne doesconsolidationofvisuospatialsequenceknowledgedependoneyemovements
AT vandenbosschejochen doesconsolidationofvisuospatialsequenceknowledgedependoneyemovements
AT homblekoen doesconsolidationofvisuospatialsequenceknowledgedependoneyemovements
AT vandenbusscheeva doesconsolidationofvisuospatialsequenceknowledgedependoneyemovements
AT soetenseric doesconsolidationofvisuospatialsequenceknowledgedependoneyemovements
AT deroostnatacha doesconsolidationofvisuospatialsequenceknowledgedependoneyemovements