Cargando…

Visual motion processing deficits in infants with the fragile X premutation

BACKGROUND: Fragile X syndrome (FXS) results from a trinucleotide repeat expansion (full mutation >200 cytosine-guanine-guanine (CGG) repeats) in the FMR1 gene, leading to a reduction or absence of the gene’s protein product, fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), ultimately causing cogniti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gallego, Pamela K, Burris, Jessica L, Rivera, Susan M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4121307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25093044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1866-1955-6-29
_version_ 1782329214322606080
author Gallego, Pamela K
Burris, Jessica L
Rivera, Susan M
author_facet Gallego, Pamela K
Burris, Jessica L
Rivera, Susan M
author_sort Gallego, Pamela K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fragile X syndrome (FXS) results from a trinucleotide repeat expansion (full mutation >200 cytosine-guanine-guanine (CGG) repeats) in the FMR1 gene, leading to a reduction or absence of the gene’s protein product, fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), ultimately causing cognitive and behavioral impairments that are characteristic of the syndrome. In our previous work with infants and toddlers with FXS, we have been able to describe much about their cognitive and visual processing abilities. In light of recent work on the mild cognitive deficits and functional and structural brain differences that are present in adults with the fragile X (FX) premutation, in the present study we examined whether some of the low-level visual processing deficits we have observed in infants with FXS would also be present in infants with the FX premutation (55–200 CGG repeats). METHODS: We chose a contrast detection task using second-order motion stimuli on which infants with FXS previously showed significantly increased detection thresholds (Vision Res 48:1471–1478, 2008). Critically, we also included a developmental delay comparison group of infants with Down syndrome (DS), who were matched to infants with FXS on both chronological and mental age, to speak to the question of whether this second-order motion processing deficit is a FX-specific phenomenon. RESULTS: As reported previously, infants with the FX full mutation showed motion contrast detection threshold levels that were significantly higher than age-matched typically developing control infants. Strikingly, the motion detection contrast levels of FX premutation infants were also significantly higher than typically developing (TD) infants and not significantly different from the group of infants with FXS or with DS. CONCLUSIONS: These results, which are in keeping with a growing body of evidence on the mild cognitive and perceptual processing deficits and functional and structural brain differences that are present in adults and older children with the FX premutation, underscore the pressing need to study and describe the processing capabilities of infants and toddlers with the FX premutation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4121307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41213072014-08-05 Visual motion processing deficits in infants with the fragile X premutation Gallego, Pamela K Burris, Jessica L Rivera, Susan M J Neurodev Disord Research BACKGROUND: Fragile X syndrome (FXS) results from a trinucleotide repeat expansion (full mutation >200 cytosine-guanine-guanine (CGG) repeats) in the FMR1 gene, leading to a reduction or absence of the gene’s protein product, fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), ultimately causing cognitive and behavioral impairments that are characteristic of the syndrome. In our previous work with infants and toddlers with FXS, we have been able to describe much about their cognitive and visual processing abilities. In light of recent work on the mild cognitive deficits and functional and structural brain differences that are present in adults with the fragile X (FX) premutation, in the present study we examined whether some of the low-level visual processing deficits we have observed in infants with FXS would also be present in infants with the FX premutation (55–200 CGG repeats). METHODS: We chose a contrast detection task using second-order motion stimuli on which infants with FXS previously showed significantly increased detection thresholds (Vision Res 48:1471–1478, 2008). Critically, we also included a developmental delay comparison group of infants with Down syndrome (DS), who were matched to infants with FXS on both chronological and mental age, to speak to the question of whether this second-order motion processing deficit is a FX-specific phenomenon. RESULTS: As reported previously, infants with the FX full mutation showed motion contrast detection threshold levels that were significantly higher than age-matched typically developing control infants. Strikingly, the motion detection contrast levels of FX premutation infants were also significantly higher than typically developing (TD) infants and not significantly different from the group of infants with FXS or with DS. CONCLUSIONS: These results, which are in keeping with a growing body of evidence on the mild cognitive and perceptual processing deficits and functional and structural brain differences that are present in adults and older children with the FX premutation, underscore the pressing need to study and describe the processing capabilities of infants and toddlers with the FX premutation. BioMed Central 2014 2014-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4121307/ /pubmed/25093044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1866-1955-6-29 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gallego et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gallego, Pamela K
Burris, Jessica L
Rivera, Susan M
Visual motion processing deficits in infants with the fragile X premutation
title Visual motion processing deficits in infants with the fragile X premutation
title_full Visual motion processing deficits in infants with the fragile X premutation
title_fullStr Visual motion processing deficits in infants with the fragile X premutation
title_full_unstemmed Visual motion processing deficits in infants with the fragile X premutation
title_short Visual motion processing deficits in infants with the fragile X premutation
title_sort visual motion processing deficits in infants with the fragile x premutation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4121307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25093044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1866-1955-6-29
work_keys_str_mv AT gallegopamelak visualmotionprocessingdeficitsininfantswiththefragilexpremutation
AT burrisjessical visualmotionprocessingdeficitsininfantswiththefragilexpremutation
AT riverasusanm visualmotionprocessingdeficitsininfantswiththefragilexpremutation