Cargando…

Which method of left atrium size quantification is the most accurate to recognize thromboembolic risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?

BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) size is a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes in patients in sinus rhythm, whereas conflicting results have been found in atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aims to: (1) Evaluate the accuracy of LA size to identify surrogate markers of an increased thromboembolic risk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faustino, Ana, Providência, Rui, Barra, Sérgio, Paiva, Luís, Trigo, Joana, Botelho, Ana, Costa, Marco, Gonçalves, Lino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4121510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25052699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-12-28
_version_ 1782329239344775168
author Faustino, Ana
Providência, Rui
Barra, Sérgio
Paiva, Luís
Trigo, Joana
Botelho, Ana
Costa, Marco
Gonçalves, Lino
author_facet Faustino, Ana
Providência, Rui
Barra, Sérgio
Paiva, Luís
Trigo, Joana
Botelho, Ana
Costa, Marco
Gonçalves, Lino
author_sort Faustino, Ana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) size is a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes in patients in sinus rhythm, whereas conflicting results have been found in atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aims to: (1) Evaluate the accuracy of LA size to identify surrogate markers of an increased thromboembolic risk in patients with AF; (2) Assess the best method to evaluate LA size in this setting. METHODS: Cross-sectional study enrolling 500 consecutive patients undergoing transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography evaluation during a non-valvular AF episode. LA size was measured on transthoracic echocardiography using several methods: anteroposterior diameter, area in four-chamber view, and volumes by the ellipsoid, single- and biplane area-length formulas. Surrogate markers of stroke were evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography: LA appendage (LAA) thrombus, LAA low flow velocities, dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and LA abnormality. RESULTS: Except for non-indexed anteroposterior diameter, increased LA size quantified by all the other methods showed a moderate to high discriminatory power to identify all the surrogate markers of stroke. A higher accuracy was observed for indexed LA area in four-chamber view (LAA thrombus: AUC = 0.708, CI(95%) 0.644- 0.772, p<0.001; LAA low flow velocities: AUC = 0.733, CI(95%) 0.674- 0.793, p<0.001; dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast: AUC = 0.693, CI(95%) 0.638- 0.748, p<0.001; LA abnormality: AUC = 0.705, CI(95%) 0.654-0.755, p<0.001), indexed single-plane area-length volume (LAA thrombus: AUC = 0.701, CI(95%) 0.633-0.770, p<0.001; LAA low flow velocities: AUC = 0.726, CI(95%) 0.660-0.792, p<0.001; dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast: AUC = 0.673, CI(95%) 0.611-0.736, p<0.001; LA abnormality: AUC = 0.687, CI(95%) 0.629-0.744, p<0.001), and indexed biplane area-length volume (LAA thrombus: AUC = 0.707, CI(95%) 0.626-0.788, p<0.001; LAA low flow velocities: AUC = 0.737, CI(95%) 0.664-0.810, p<0.001; dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast: AUC = 0.651, CI(95%) 0.578-0.724, p<0.001; LA abnormality: AUC = 0.683, CI(95%) 0.617-0.749, p<0.001), without significant difference between them. Indexed LA area in four-chamber view and indexed area-length volumes also were independent predictors of surrogate markers of stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Left atrium enlargement is associated with an increased prevalence of surrogate markers of stroke in patients with non-valvular AF. Indexed LA area in four-chamber view and indexed area-length volumes displayed the strongest association.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4121510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41215102014-08-06 Which method of left atrium size quantification is the most accurate to recognize thromboembolic risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation? Faustino, Ana Providência, Rui Barra, Sérgio Paiva, Luís Trigo, Joana Botelho, Ana Costa, Marco Gonçalves, Lino Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) size is a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes in patients in sinus rhythm, whereas conflicting results have been found in atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aims to: (1) Evaluate the accuracy of LA size to identify surrogate markers of an increased thromboembolic risk in patients with AF; (2) Assess the best method to evaluate LA size in this setting. METHODS: Cross-sectional study enrolling 500 consecutive patients undergoing transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography evaluation during a non-valvular AF episode. LA size was measured on transthoracic echocardiography using several methods: anteroposterior diameter, area in four-chamber view, and volumes by the ellipsoid, single- and biplane area-length formulas. Surrogate markers of stroke were evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography: LA appendage (LAA) thrombus, LAA low flow velocities, dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and LA abnormality. RESULTS: Except for non-indexed anteroposterior diameter, increased LA size quantified by all the other methods showed a moderate to high discriminatory power to identify all the surrogate markers of stroke. A higher accuracy was observed for indexed LA area in four-chamber view (LAA thrombus: AUC = 0.708, CI(95%) 0.644- 0.772, p<0.001; LAA low flow velocities: AUC = 0.733, CI(95%) 0.674- 0.793, p<0.001; dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast: AUC = 0.693, CI(95%) 0.638- 0.748, p<0.001; LA abnormality: AUC = 0.705, CI(95%) 0.654-0.755, p<0.001), indexed single-plane area-length volume (LAA thrombus: AUC = 0.701, CI(95%) 0.633-0.770, p<0.001; LAA low flow velocities: AUC = 0.726, CI(95%) 0.660-0.792, p<0.001; dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast: AUC = 0.673, CI(95%) 0.611-0.736, p<0.001; LA abnormality: AUC = 0.687, CI(95%) 0.629-0.744, p<0.001), and indexed biplane area-length volume (LAA thrombus: AUC = 0.707, CI(95%) 0.626-0.788, p<0.001; LAA low flow velocities: AUC = 0.737, CI(95%) 0.664-0.810, p<0.001; dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast: AUC = 0.651, CI(95%) 0.578-0.724, p<0.001; LA abnormality: AUC = 0.683, CI(95%) 0.617-0.749, p<0.001), without significant difference between them. Indexed LA area in four-chamber view and indexed area-length volumes also were independent predictors of surrogate markers of stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Left atrium enlargement is associated with an increased prevalence of surrogate markers of stroke in patients with non-valvular AF. Indexed LA area in four-chamber view and indexed area-length volumes displayed the strongest association. BioMed Central 2014-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4121510/ /pubmed/25052699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-12-28 Text en Copyright © 2014 Faustino et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Faustino, Ana
Providência, Rui
Barra, Sérgio
Paiva, Luís
Trigo, Joana
Botelho, Ana
Costa, Marco
Gonçalves, Lino
Which method of left atrium size quantification is the most accurate to recognize thromboembolic risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
title Which method of left atrium size quantification is the most accurate to recognize thromboembolic risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
title_full Which method of left atrium size quantification is the most accurate to recognize thromboembolic risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
title_fullStr Which method of left atrium size quantification is the most accurate to recognize thromboembolic risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
title_full_unstemmed Which method of left atrium size quantification is the most accurate to recognize thromboembolic risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
title_short Which method of left atrium size quantification is the most accurate to recognize thromboembolic risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
title_sort which method of left atrium size quantification is the most accurate to recognize thromboembolic risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4121510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25052699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-12-28
work_keys_str_mv AT faustinoana whichmethodofleftatriumsizequantificationisthemostaccuratetorecognizethromboembolicriskinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT providenciarui whichmethodofleftatriumsizequantificationisthemostaccuratetorecognizethromboembolicriskinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT barrasergio whichmethodofleftatriumsizequantificationisthemostaccuratetorecognizethromboembolicriskinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT paivaluis whichmethodofleftatriumsizequantificationisthemostaccuratetorecognizethromboembolicriskinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT trigojoana whichmethodofleftatriumsizequantificationisthemostaccuratetorecognizethromboembolicriskinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT botelhoana whichmethodofleftatriumsizequantificationisthemostaccuratetorecognizethromboembolicriskinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT costamarco whichmethodofleftatriumsizequantificationisthemostaccuratetorecognizethromboembolicriskinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT goncalveslino whichmethodofleftatriumsizequantificationisthemostaccuratetorecognizethromboembolicriskinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation