Cargando…

Adherence to an overweight and obesity treatment: how to motivate a patient?

Objective. To explore anthropometric changes in normal-weight, overweight and obese subjects who did not dropout or fail a weight loss program over the 16 treatment weeks to improve patient motivation and treatment adherence. Methods. A clinical intervention study was conducted among 271 (including...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuzmar, Isaac, Rizo, Mercedes, Cortés-Castell, Ernesto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4121588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25101227
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.495
_version_ 1782329249114357760
author Kuzmar, Isaac
Rizo, Mercedes
Cortés-Castell, Ernesto
author_facet Kuzmar, Isaac
Rizo, Mercedes
Cortés-Castell, Ernesto
author_sort Kuzmar, Isaac
collection PubMed
description Objective. To explore anthropometric changes in normal-weight, overweight and obese subjects who did not dropout or fail a weight loss program over the 16 treatment weeks to improve patient motivation and treatment adherence. Methods. A clinical intervention study was conducted among 271 (including 100 dropouts and/or failures) obese and overweight patients who consulted a nutrition clinic in Barranquilla (Colombia) for the purpose of nutritional assessment. They were subject to a personalized weekly follow-up consultation over the course of 16 weeks in which initial and the final Body Mass Index (BMI, kg/m(2)), photographs, food consumption patterns, percentage weight loss, waist and hip circumference were registered and grouped according to BMI, measuring treatment response. Data’s nonparametric statistical comparison was made. Results. In 62 patients from the BMI < 25 group, there is weight loss of 2.6% (3.1 SD), 5.5% (3.3 SD) in waist circumference and 3.0% (2.5 SD) in hip circumference. In 67 patients from the 25 ≥ BMI < 30 group, there is weight loss of 3.8% (4.1 SD), 5.7% (4.5 SD) in waist circumference loss and 3.7% (3.0 SD) in hip circumference loss. In 42 patients from the BMI > 30 group, there is weight loss of 4.8% (3.7 SD), 7.0% (3.6 SD) in waist circumference loss and 3.9% (2.4 SD) in hip circumference loss. Monitoring is done every 4 weeks by the Friedman test, with significant differences between the three groups (p < 0.001). Patients do not drop out of treatment because they start to see physical results in waist decrease. When comparing final values of initial waist/hip circumference ratios and waist/height ratios, a clear decrease in the three BMI groups was observed (p < 0.001). Conclusion. After three weeks of continuous treatment patients improved in all overweight and obesity parameter indicators; there were not statistically significant differences in hip circumference (HC) and waist loss (WC) (%) among the three BMI groups (normal-weight, overweight, and obesity). In contrast, there were statistically significant differences in weight loss (%) and waist-to-hip ratios. Based on anthropometric outcomes and patient perception of their body image it can be concluded that the waist circumference loss is the parameter that retains obese patients in the weight loss program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4121588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41215882014-08-06 Adherence to an overweight and obesity treatment: how to motivate a patient? Kuzmar, Isaac Rizo, Mercedes Cortés-Castell, Ernesto PeerJ Nutrition Objective. To explore anthropometric changes in normal-weight, overweight and obese subjects who did not dropout or fail a weight loss program over the 16 treatment weeks to improve patient motivation and treatment adherence. Methods. A clinical intervention study was conducted among 271 (including 100 dropouts and/or failures) obese and overweight patients who consulted a nutrition clinic in Barranquilla (Colombia) for the purpose of nutritional assessment. They were subject to a personalized weekly follow-up consultation over the course of 16 weeks in which initial and the final Body Mass Index (BMI, kg/m(2)), photographs, food consumption patterns, percentage weight loss, waist and hip circumference were registered and grouped according to BMI, measuring treatment response. Data’s nonparametric statistical comparison was made. Results. In 62 patients from the BMI < 25 group, there is weight loss of 2.6% (3.1 SD), 5.5% (3.3 SD) in waist circumference and 3.0% (2.5 SD) in hip circumference. In 67 patients from the 25 ≥ BMI < 30 group, there is weight loss of 3.8% (4.1 SD), 5.7% (4.5 SD) in waist circumference loss and 3.7% (3.0 SD) in hip circumference loss. In 42 patients from the BMI > 30 group, there is weight loss of 4.8% (3.7 SD), 7.0% (3.6 SD) in waist circumference loss and 3.9% (2.4 SD) in hip circumference loss. Monitoring is done every 4 weeks by the Friedman test, with significant differences between the three groups (p < 0.001). Patients do not drop out of treatment because they start to see physical results in waist decrease. When comparing final values of initial waist/hip circumference ratios and waist/height ratios, a clear decrease in the three BMI groups was observed (p < 0.001). Conclusion. After three weeks of continuous treatment patients improved in all overweight and obesity parameter indicators; there were not statistically significant differences in hip circumference (HC) and waist loss (WC) (%) among the three BMI groups (normal-weight, overweight, and obesity). In contrast, there were statistically significant differences in weight loss (%) and waist-to-hip ratios. Based on anthropometric outcomes and patient perception of their body image it can be concluded that the waist circumference loss is the parameter that retains obese patients in the weight loss program. PeerJ Inc. 2014-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4121588/ /pubmed/25101227 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.495 Text en © 2014 Kuzmar et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Kuzmar, Isaac
Rizo, Mercedes
Cortés-Castell, Ernesto
Adherence to an overweight and obesity treatment: how to motivate a patient?
title Adherence to an overweight and obesity treatment: how to motivate a patient?
title_full Adherence to an overweight and obesity treatment: how to motivate a patient?
title_fullStr Adherence to an overweight and obesity treatment: how to motivate a patient?
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to an overweight and obesity treatment: how to motivate a patient?
title_short Adherence to an overweight and obesity treatment: how to motivate a patient?
title_sort adherence to an overweight and obesity treatment: how to motivate a patient?
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4121588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25101227
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.495
work_keys_str_mv AT kuzmarisaac adherencetoanoverweightandobesitytreatmenthowtomotivateapatient
AT rizomercedes adherencetoanoverweightandobesitytreatmenthowtomotivateapatient
AT cortescastellernesto adherencetoanoverweightandobesitytreatmenthowtomotivateapatient