Cargando…
Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy:A prospective non-randomized trial
Objective: To compare outcomes of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy procedures in women with benign gynaecological diseases. Methods: This was a prospective study of outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent total vaginal hysterectomy (VH) or abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for benign gynaecologic...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Professional Medical Publicaitons
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4121717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097536 |
_version_ | 1782329267618578432 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Bing Ren, Dong-Ping Li, Jing-Xuan Li, Chun-Dong |
author_facet | Chen, Bing Ren, Dong-Ping Li, Jing-Xuan Li, Chun-Dong |
author_sort | Chen, Bing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To compare outcomes of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy procedures in women with benign gynaecological diseases. Methods: This was a prospective study of outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent total vaginal hysterectomy (VH) or abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for benign gynaecological diseases. Patient characteristics before, during, and after the operations were reviewed. Patients were followed up for three months to evaluate postoperative complications. Results: This study included a total of 313 patients. 143 patients underwent AH and 170 patients underwent VH. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, first postoperative flatus time, time to out-of-bed activity, mean maximum postoperative body temperature, and duration of fever were all significantly shorter and less severe in the VH group compared with the AH group. In addition, vaginal length in the VH group was significantly shorter than in the AH group. Conclusions: Vaginal hysterectomy has advantages over AH in the treatment of benign gynaecological diseases, providing greater efficacy and safety with minimal invasiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4121717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Professional Medical Publicaitons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41217172014-08-05 Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy:A prospective non-randomized trial Chen, Bing Ren, Dong-Ping Li, Jing-Xuan Li, Chun-Dong Pak J Med Sci Original Article Objective: To compare outcomes of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy procedures in women with benign gynaecological diseases. Methods: This was a prospective study of outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent total vaginal hysterectomy (VH) or abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for benign gynaecological diseases. Patient characteristics before, during, and after the operations were reviewed. Patients were followed up for three months to evaluate postoperative complications. Results: This study included a total of 313 patients. 143 patients underwent AH and 170 patients underwent VH. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, first postoperative flatus time, time to out-of-bed activity, mean maximum postoperative body temperature, and duration of fever were all significantly shorter and less severe in the VH group compared with the AH group. In addition, vaginal length in the VH group was significantly shorter than in the AH group. Conclusions: Vaginal hysterectomy has advantages over AH in the treatment of benign gynaecological diseases, providing greater efficacy and safety with minimal invasiveness. Professional Medical Publicaitons 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4121717/ /pubmed/25097536 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chen, Bing Ren, Dong-Ping Li, Jing-Xuan Li, Chun-Dong Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy:A prospective non-randomized trial |
title | Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy:A prospective non-randomized trial |
title_full | Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy:A prospective non-randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy:A prospective non-randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy:A prospective non-randomized trial |
title_short | Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy:A prospective non-randomized trial |
title_sort | comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy:a prospective non-randomized trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4121717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097536 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenbing comparisonofvaginalandabdominalhysterectomyaprospectivenonrandomizedtrial AT rendongping comparisonofvaginalandabdominalhysterectomyaprospectivenonrandomizedtrial AT lijingxuan comparisonofvaginalandabdominalhysterectomyaprospectivenonrandomizedtrial AT lichundong comparisonofvaginalandabdominalhysterectomyaprospectivenonrandomizedtrial |