Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three restorative glass ionomer cements: An in vitro study
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of glass ionomers (conventional and resin modified) with that of recently introduced nanoionomers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standardized class I and class V cavities were prepared on 120 young permanent teeth. Samples were equally divided...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4121918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097418 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.136193 |
_version_ | 1782329278060298240 |
---|---|
author | Diwanji, Amish Dhar, Vineet Arora, Ruchi Madhusudan, A. Rathore, Ambika Singh |
author_facet | Diwanji, Amish Dhar, Vineet Arora, Ruchi Madhusudan, A. Rathore, Ambika Singh |
author_sort | Diwanji, Amish |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of glass ionomers (conventional and resin modified) with that of recently introduced nanoionomers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standardized class I and class V cavities were prepared on 120 young permanent teeth. Samples were equally divided into group I (class I restorations) and group II (class V restorations), and further divided into subgroups. The subgroups were restored with Fuji IX, Fuji II LC, and newly introduced Ketac(™) N 100 (KN 100). Samples were thermocycled and submerged in Acridine dye for 24 h. Samples were sectioned to view under fluorescent microscope and marginal leakage was evaluated by Chi-square and Kruskal — Wallis test. RESULTS: Fuji IX showed the maximum leakage, followed by LC II and the least was observed in KN 100. In class I restorations, there was significant difference while comparing Fuji IX with Fuji LC II and KN 100 and nonsignificant difference between LC II and KN100. In class V restorations, Fuji IX and KN100, KN 100 and LC II showed significant difference. Fuji IX and LC II showed nonsignificant difference. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, Fuji IX showed the maximum microleakage. KN 100 showed minimum leakage, better sealing ability, and was more consistent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4121918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41219182014-08-05 Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three restorative glass ionomer cements: An in vitro study Diwanji, Amish Dhar, Vineet Arora, Ruchi Madhusudan, A. Rathore, Ambika Singh J Nat Sci Biol Med Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of glass ionomers (conventional and resin modified) with that of recently introduced nanoionomers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standardized class I and class V cavities were prepared on 120 young permanent teeth. Samples were equally divided into group I (class I restorations) and group II (class V restorations), and further divided into subgroups. The subgroups were restored with Fuji IX, Fuji II LC, and newly introduced Ketac(™) N 100 (KN 100). Samples were thermocycled and submerged in Acridine dye for 24 h. Samples were sectioned to view under fluorescent microscope and marginal leakage was evaluated by Chi-square and Kruskal — Wallis test. RESULTS: Fuji IX showed the maximum leakage, followed by LC II and the least was observed in KN 100. In class I restorations, there was significant difference while comparing Fuji IX with Fuji LC II and KN 100 and nonsignificant difference between LC II and KN100. In class V restorations, Fuji IX and KN100, KN 100 and LC II showed significant difference. Fuji IX and LC II showed nonsignificant difference. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, Fuji IX showed the maximum microleakage. KN 100 showed minimum leakage, better sealing ability, and was more consistent. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4121918/ /pubmed/25097418 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.136193 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Diwanji, Amish Dhar, Vineet Arora, Ruchi Madhusudan, A. Rathore, Ambika Singh Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three restorative glass ionomer cements: An in vitro study |
title | Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three restorative glass ionomer cements: An in vitro study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three restorative glass ionomer cements: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three restorative glass ionomer cements: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three restorative glass ionomer cements: An in vitro study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three restorative glass ionomer cements: An in vitro study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of microleakage of three restorative glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4121918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097418 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.136193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diwanjiamish comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofthreerestorativeglassionomercementsaninvitrostudy AT dharvineet comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofthreerestorativeglassionomercementsaninvitrostudy AT aroraruchi comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofthreerestorativeglassionomercementsaninvitrostudy AT madhusudana comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofthreerestorativeglassionomercementsaninvitrostudy AT rathoreambikasingh comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofthreerestorativeglassionomercementsaninvitrostudy |