Cargando…
Bi-level CPAP does not change central blood flow in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome
BACKGROUND: Current literature provides limited data on the hemodynamic changes that may occur during bi-level continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support in preterm infants. However, the application of a positive end-expiratory pressure may be transmitted to the heart and the great vessels r...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4122055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24952579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-40-60 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Current literature provides limited data on the hemodynamic changes that may occur during bi-level continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support in preterm infants. However, the application of a positive end-expiratory pressure may be transmitted to the heart and the great vessels resulting in changes of central blood flow. OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in central blood flow in infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) during bi-level CPAP support. DESIGN: A prospective study was performed in a cohort of 18 Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants who were put on nasal CPAP support (4–5 cmH(2)O) because they developed RDS within the first 24–72 hours of life. Each subject was switched to bi-level CPAP support (Phigh 8 cmH(2)O, Plow 4–5 cmH(2)O, Thigh 0.5-0.6 seconds, 20 breaths/min) for an hour. An echocardiographic study and a capillary gas analysis were performed before and after the change of respiratory support. RESULTS: No differences between n-CPAP and bi-level CPAP in left ventricular output (LVO, 222.17 ± 81.4 vs 211.4 ± 75.3 ml/kg/min), right ventricular output (RVO, 287.8 ± 96 vs 283.4 ± 87.4 ml/kg/min) and superior vena cava flow (SVC, 135.38 ± 47.8 vs 137.48 ± 46.6 ml/kg/min) were observed. The hemodynamic characteristics of the ductus arteriosus were similar. A significant decrease in pCO(2) levels after bi-level CPAP ventilation was observed; pCO(2) variations did not correlate with modifications of central blood flow (LVO: ρ = 0.11, p = 0,657; RVO: ρ = −0.307, p = 0.216; SVC: ρ = −0.13, p = 0.197). CONCLUSIONS: Central blood flow doesn’t change during bi-level CPAP support, which could become a hemodinamically safe tool for the treatment of RDS in preterm infants. |
---|