Cargando…

Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years

Clinicians and researchers have widely believed that face processing cannot be improved in prosopagnosia. Though more than a dozen reported studies have attempted to enhance face processing in prosopagnosics over the last 50 years, evidence for effective treatment approaches has only begun to emerge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DeGutis, Joseph M., Chiu, Christopher, Grosso, Mallory E., Cohan, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4122168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25140137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00561
_version_ 1782329317850611712
author DeGutis, Joseph M.
Chiu, Christopher
Grosso, Mallory E.
Cohan, Sarah
author_facet DeGutis, Joseph M.
Chiu, Christopher
Grosso, Mallory E.
Cohan, Sarah
author_sort DeGutis, Joseph M.
collection PubMed
description Clinicians and researchers have widely believed that face processing cannot be improved in prosopagnosia. Though more than a dozen reported studies have attempted to enhance face processing in prosopagnosics over the last 50 years, evidence for effective treatment approaches has only begun to emerge. Here, we review the current literature on spontaneous recovery in acquired prosopagnosia (AP), as well as treatment attempts in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia (DP), differentiating between compensatory and remedial approaches. We find that for AP, rather than remedial methods, strategic compensatory training such as verbalizing distinctive facial features has shown to be the most effective approach (despite limited evidence of generalization). In children with DP, compensatory training has also shown some effectiveness. In adults with DP, two recent larger-scale studies, one using remedial training and another administering oxytocin, have demonstrated group-level improvements and evidence of generalization. These results suggest that DPs, perhaps because of their more intact face processing infrastructure, may benefit more from treatments targeting face processing than APs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4122168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41221682014-08-19 Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years DeGutis, Joseph M. Chiu, Christopher Grosso, Mallory E. Cohan, Sarah Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Clinicians and researchers have widely believed that face processing cannot be improved in prosopagnosia. Though more than a dozen reported studies have attempted to enhance face processing in prosopagnosics over the last 50 years, evidence for effective treatment approaches has only begun to emerge. Here, we review the current literature on spontaneous recovery in acquired prosopagnosia (AP), as well as treatment attempts in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia (DP), differentiating between compensatory and remedial approaches. We find that for AP, rather than remedial methods, strategic compensatory training such as verbalizing distinctive facial features has shown to be the most effective approach (despite limited evidence of generalization). In children with DP, compensatory training has also shown some effectiveness. In adults with DP, two recent larger-scale studies, one using remedial training and another administering oxytocin, have demonstrated group-level improvements and evidence of generalization. These results suggest that DPs, perhaps because of their more intact face processing infrastructure, may benefit more from treatments targeting face processing than APs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4122168/ /pubmed/25140137 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00561 Text en Copyright © 2014 DeGutis, Chiu, Grosso and Cohan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
DeGutis, Joseph M.
Chiu, Christopher
Grosso, Mallory E.
Cohan, Sarah
Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years
title Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years
title_full Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years
title_fullStr Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years
title_full_unstemmed Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years
title_short Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years
title_sort face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4122168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25140137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00561
work_keys_str_mv AT degutisjosephm faceprocessingimprovementsinprosopagnosiasuccessesandfailuresoverthelast50years
AT chiuchristopher faceprocessingimprovementsinprosopagnosiasuccessesandfailuresoverthelast50years
AT grossomallorye faceprocessingimprovementsinprosopagnosiasuccessesandfailuresoverthelast50years
AT cohansarah faceprocessingimprovementsinprosopagnosiasuccessesandfailuresoverthelast50years