Cargando…
Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years
Clinicians and researchers have widely believed that face processing cannot be improved in prosopagnosia. Though more than a dozen reported studies have attempted to enhance face processing in prosopagnosics over the last 50 years, evidence for effective treatment approaches has only begun to emerge...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4122168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25140137 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00561 |
_version_ | 1782329317850611712 |
---|---|
author | DeGutis, Joseph M. Chiu, Christopher Grosso, Mallory E. Cohan, Sarah |
author_facet | DeGutis, Joseph M. Chiu, Christopher Grosso, Mallory E. Cohan, Sarah |
author_sort | DeGutis, Joseph M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinicians and researchers have widely believed that face processing cannot be improved in prosopagnosia. Though more than a dozen reported studies have attempted to enhance face processing in prosopagnosics over the last 50 years, evidence for effective treatment approaches has only begun to emerge. Here, we review the current literature on spontaneous recovery in acquired prosopagnosia (AP), as well as treatment attempts in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia (DP), differentiating between compensatory and remedial approaches. We find that for AP, rather than remedial methods, strategic compensatory training such as verbalizing distinctive facial features has shown to be the most effective approach (despite limited evidence of generalization). In children with DP, compensatory training has also shown some effectiveness. In adults with DP, two recent larger-scale studies, one using remedial training and another administering oxytocin, have demonstrated group-level improvements and evidence of generalization. These results suggest that DPs, perhaps because of their more intact face processing infrastructure, may benefit more from treatments targeting face processing than APs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4122168 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41221682014-08-19 Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years DeGutis, Joseph M. Chiu, Christopher Grosso, Mallory E. Cohan, Sarah Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Clinicians and researchers have widely believed that face processing cannot be improved in prosopagnosia. Though more than a dozen reported studies have attempted to enhance face processing in prosopagnosics over the last 50 years, evidence for effective treatment approaches has only begun to emerge. Here, we review the current literature on spontaneous recovery in acquired prosopagnosia (AP), as well as treatment attempts in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia (DP), differentiating between compensatory and remedial approaches. We find that for AP, rather than remedial methods, strategic compensatory training such as verbalizing distinctive facial features has shown to be the most effective approach (despite limited evidence of generalization). In children with DP, compensatory training has also shown some effectiveness. In adults with DP, two recent larger-scale studies, one using remedial training and another administering oxytocin, have demonstrated group-level improvements and evidence of generalization. These results suggest that DPs, perhaps because of their more intact face processing infrastructure, may benefit more from treatments targeting face processing than APs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4122168/ /pubmed/25140137 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00561 Text en Copyright © 2014 DeGutis, Chiu, Grosso and Cohan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience DeGutis, Joseph M. Chiu, Christopher Grosso, Mallory E. Cohan, Sarah Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years |
title | Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years |
title_full | Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years |
title_fullStr | Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years |
title_full_unstemmed | Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years |
title_short | Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years |
title_sort | face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4122168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25140137 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00561 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degutisjosephm faceprocessingimprovementsinprosopagnosiasuccessesandfailuresoverthelast50years AT chiuchristopher faceprocessingimprovementsinprosopagnosiasuccessesandfailuresoverthelast50years AT grossomallorye faceprocessingimprovementsinprosopagnosiasuccessesandfailuresoverthelast50years AT cohansarah faceprocessingimprovementsinprosopagnosiasuccessesandfailuresoverthelast50years |