Cargando…
The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action
A co-actor's intentionality has been suggested to be a key modulating factor for joint action effects like the joint Simon effect (JSE). However, in previous studies intentionality has often been confounded with agency defined as perceiving the initiator of an action as being the causal source...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4122204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25140144 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00595 |
_version_ | 1782329325537722368 |
---|---|
author | Stenzel, Anna Dolk, Thomas Colzato, Lorenza S. Sellaro, Roberta Hommel, Bernhard Liepelt, Roman |
author_facet | Stenzel, Anna Dolk, Thomas Colzato, Lorenza S. Sellaro, Roberta Hommel, Bernhard Liepelt, Roman |
author_sort | Stenzel, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | A co-actor's intentionality has been suggested to be a key modulating factor for joint action effects like the joint Simon effect (JSE). However, in previous studies intentionality has often been confounded with agency defined as perceiving the initiator of an action as being the causal source of the action. The aim of the present study was to disentangle the role of agency and intentionality as modulating factors of the JSE. In Experiment 1, participants performed a joint go/nogo Simon task next to a co-actor who either intentionally controlled a response button with own finger movements (agency+/intentionality+) or who passively placed the hand on a response button that moved up and down on its own as triggered by computer signals (agency−/intentionality−). In Experiment 2, we included a condition in which participants believed that the co-actor intentionally controlled the response button with a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) while placing the response finger clearly besides the response button, so that the causal relationship between agent and action effect was perceptually disrupted (agency−/intentionality+). As a control condition, the response button was computer controlled while the co-actor placed the response finger besides the response button (agency−/intentionality−). Experiment 1 showed that the JSE is present with an intentional co-actor and causality between co-actor and action effect, but absent with an unintentional co-actor and a lack of causality between co-actor and action effect. Experiment 2 showed that the JSE is absent with an intentional co-actor, but no causality between co-actor and action effect. Our findings indicate an important role of the co-actor's agency for the JSE. They also suggest that the attribution of agency has a strong perceptual basis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4122204 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41222042014-08-19 The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action Stenzel, Anna Dolk, Thomas Colzato, Lorenza S. Sellaro, Roberta Hommel, Bernhard Liepelt, Roman Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience A co-actor's intentionality has been suggested to be a key modulating factor for joint action effects like the joint Simon effect (JSE). However, in previous studies intentionality has often been confounded with agency defined as perceiving the initiator of an action as being the causal source of the action. The aim of the present study was to disentangle the role of agency and intentionality as modulating factors of the JSE. In Experiment 1, participants performed a joint go/nogo Simon task next to a co-actor who either intentionally controlled a response button with own finger movements (agency+/intentionality+) or who passively placed the hand on a response button that moved up and down on its own as triggered by computer signals (agency−/intentionality−). In Experiment 2, we included a condition in which participants believed that the co-actor intentionally controlled the response button with a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) while placing the response finger clearly besides the response button, so that the causal relationship between agent and action effect was perceptually disrupted (agency−/intentionality+). As a control condition, the response button was computer controlled while the co-actor placed the response finger besides the response button (agency−/intentionality−). Experiment 1 showed that the JSE is present with an intentional co-actor and causality between co-actor and action effect, but absent with an unintentional co-actor and a lack of causality between co-actor and action effect. Experiment 2 showed that the JSE is absent with an intentional co-actor, but no causality between co-actor and action effect. Our findings indicate an important role of the co-actor's agency for the JSE. They also suggest that the attribution of agency has a strong perceptual basis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4122204/ /pubmed/25140144 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00595 Text en Copyright © 2014 Stenzel, Dolk, Colzato, Sellaro, Hommel and Liepelt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Stenzel, Anna Dolk, Thomas Colzato, Lorenza S. Sellaro, Roberta Hommel, Bernhard Liepelt, Roman The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action |
title | The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action |
title_full | The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action |
title_fullStr | The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action |
title_full_unstemmed | The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action |
title_short | The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action |
title_sort | joint simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4122204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25140144 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00595 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stenzelanna thejointsimoneffectdependsonperceivedagencybutnotintentionalityofthealternativeaction AT dolkthomas thejointsimoneffectdependsonperceivedagencybutnotintentionalityofthealternativeaction AT colzatolorenzas thejointsimoneffectdependsonperceivedagencybutnotintentionalityofthealternativeaction AT sellaroroberta thejointsimoneffectdependsonperceivedagencybutnotintentionalityofthealternativeaction AT hommelbernhard thejointsimoneffectdependsonperceivedagencybutnotintentionalityofthealternativeaction AT liepeltroman thejointsimoneffectdependsonperceivedagencybutnotintentionalityofthealternativeaction AT stenzelanna jointsimoneffectdependsonperceivedagencybutnotintentionalityofthealternativeaction AT dolkthomas jointsimoneffectdependsonperceivedagencybutnotintentionalityofthealternativeaction AT colzatolorenzas jointsimoneffectdependsonperceivedagencybutnotintentionalityofthealternativeaction AT sellaroroberta jointsimoneffectdependsonperceivedagencybutnotintentionalityofthealternativeaction AT hommelbernhard jointsimoneffectdependsonperceivedagencybutnotintentionalityofthealternativeaction AT liepeltroman jointsimoneffectdependsonperceivedagencybutnotintentionalityofthealternativeaction |