Cargando…
Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic
BACKGROUND: Little is known about lay understanding and decision making in response to colic. Horse-owners/carers are key to identifying colic and initiating veterinary intervention. Understanding how owners think and act in relation to colic could assist veterinary surgeons in tailoring information...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4122872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25238026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-S1-S1 |
_version_ | 1782329407157829632 |
---|---|
author | Scantlebury, Claire E Perkins, Elizabeth Pinchbeck, Gina L Archer, Debra C Christley, Robert M |
author_facet | Scantlebury, Claire E Perkins, Elizabeth Pinchbeck, Gina L Archer, Debra C Christley, Robert M |
author_sort | Scantlebury, Claire E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Little is known about lay understanding and decision making in response to colic. Horse-owners/carers are key to identifying colic and initiating veterinary intervention. Understanding how owners think and act in relation to colic could assist veterinary surgeons in tailoring information about colic with the aim of improving colic outcomes. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was employed including qualitative in-depth interviews and a cross-sectional questionnaire. Qualitative data were analysed using Grounded theory to conceptualise processes involved in horse-owner management of colic. Following this, a cross-sectional survey was designed to test these concepts. Cluster analysis explored the role of the human-horse relationship upon colic management strategies. RESULTS: Fifteen horse-owners with a range of colic experience participated in the interviews. A theoretical conceptual model was developed and described how horse-owners’ recognised, assessed and responded to colic. Three main management strategies were used including ‘wait and see’, ‘lay treatments’ and ‘seek veterinary assistance’. Actions in response to colic were moderated by owners’ experience of colic and interpretation of the severity of colic signs. A postal questionnaire gathered data from 673 horse-owners from the North-West of the UK. The majority (605, 89.9%) of respondents were female. Cluster analysis revealed 5 meaningful groups of horse-owners based upon assessment of questionnaire items on the human-horse relationship. These groups included 2 professional and 3 amateur owner typologies. There were differences in the responses to some questionnaire items among the identified groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes lay understanding and management of colic among a population of horse-owners from the North-West of the UK. The information may serve as a basis upon which to tailor existing programmes designed to educate owners about colic management strategies, and may inform veterinarians’ interactions with horse-owners. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4122872 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41228722014-08-11 Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic Scantlebury, Claire E Perkins, Elizabeth Pinchbeck, Gina L Archer, Debra C Christley, Robert M BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Little is known about lay understanding and decision making in response to colic. Horse-owners/carers are key to identifying colic and initiating veterinary intervention. Understanding how owners think and act in relation to colic could assist veterinary surgeons in tailoring information about colic with the aim of improving colic outcomes. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was employed including qualitative in-depth interviews and a cross-sectional questionnaire. Qualitative data were analysed using Grounded theory to conceptualise processes involved in horse-owner management of colic. Following this, a cross-sectional survey was designed to test these concepts. Cluster analysis explored the role of the human-horse relationship upon colic management strategies. RESULTS: Fifteen horse-owners with a range of colic experience participated in the interviews. A theoretical conceptual model was developed and described how horse-owners’ recognised, assessed and responded to colic. Three main management strategies were used including ‘wait and see’, ‘lay treatments’ and ‘seek veterinary assistance’. Actions in response to colic were moderated by owners’ experience of colic and interpretation of the severity of colic signs. A postal questionnaire gathered data from 673 horse-owners from the North-West of the UK. The majority (605, 89.9%) of respondents were female. Cluster analysis revealed 5 meaningful groups of horse-owners based upon assessment of questionnaire items on the human-horse relationship. These groups included 2 professional and 3 amateur owner typologies. There were differences in the responses to some questionnaire items among the identified groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes lay understanding and management of colic among a population of horse-owners from the North-West of the UK. The information may serve as a basis upon which to tailor existing programmes designed to educate owners about colic management strategies, and may inform veterinarians’ interactions with horse-owners. BioMed Central 2014-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4122872/ /pubmed/25238026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-S1-S1 Text en Copyright © 2014 Scantlebury et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Scantlebury, Claire E Perkins, Elizabeth Pinchbeck, Gina L Archer, Debra C Christley, Robert M Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic |
title | Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic |
title_full | Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic |
title_fullStr | Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic |
title_full_unstemmed | Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic |
title_short | Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic |
title_sort | could it be colic? horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4122872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25238026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-S1-S1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scantleburyclairee coulditbecolichorseownerdecisionmakingandpracticesinresponsetoequinecolic AT perkinselizabeth coulditbecolichorseownerdecisionmakingandpracticesinresponsetoequinecolic AT pinchbeckginal coulditbecolichorseownerdecisionmakingandpracticesinresponsetoequinecolic AT archerdebrac coulditbecolichorseownerdecisionmakingandpracticesinresponsetoequinecolic AT christleyrobertm coulditbecolichorseownerdecisionmakingandpracticesinresponsetoequinecolic |