Cargando…

Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic

BACKGROUND: Little is known about lay understanding and decision making in response to colic. Horse-owners/carers are key to identifying colic and initiating veterinary intervention. Understanding how owners think and act in relation to colic could assist veterinary surgeons in tailoring information...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scantlebury, Claire E, Perkins, Elizabeth, Pinchbeck, Gina L, Archer, Debra C, Christley, Robert M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4122872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25238026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-S1-S1
_version_ 1782329407157829632
author Scantlebury, Claire E
Perkins, Elizabeth
Pinchbeck, Gina L
Archer, Debra C
Christley, Robert M
author_facet Scantlebury, Claire E
Perkins, Elizabeth
Pinchbeck, Gina L
Archer, Debra C
Christley, Robert M
author_sort Scantlebury, Claire E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about lay understanding and decision making in response to colic. Horse-owners/carers are key to identifying colic and initiating veterinary intervention. Understanding how owners think and act in relation to colic could assist veterinary surgeons in tailoring information about colic with the aim of improving colic outcomes. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was employed including qualitative in-depth interviews and a cross-sectional questionnaire. Qualitative data were analysed using Grounded theory to conceptualise processes involved in horse-owner management of colic. Following this, a cross-sectional survey was designed to test these concepts. Cluster analysis explored the role of the human-horse relationship upon colic management strategies. RESULTS: Fifteen horse-owners with a range of colic experience participated in the interviews. A theoretical conceptual model was developed and described how horse-owners’ recognised, assessed and responded to colic. Three main management strategies were used including ‘wait and see’, ‘lay treatments’ and ‘seek veterinary assistance’. Actions in response to colic were moderated by owners’ experience of colic and interpretation of the severity of colic signs. A postal questionnaire gathered data from 673 horse-owners from the North-West of the UK. The majority (605, 89.9%) of respondents were female. Cluster analysis revealed 5 meaningful groups of horse-owners based upon assessment of questionnaire items on the human-horse relationship. These groups included 2 professional and 3 amateur owner typologies. There were differences in the responses to some questionnaire items among the identified groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes lay understanding and management of colic among a population of horse-owners from the North-West of the UK. The information may serve as a basis upon which to tailor existing programmes designed to educate owners about colic management strategies, and may inform veterinarians’ interactions with horse-owners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4122872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41228722014-08-11 Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic Scantlebury, Claire E Perkins, Elizabeth Pinchbeck, Gina L Archer, Debra C Christley, Robert M BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Little is known about lay understanding and decision making in response to colic. Horse-owners/carers are key to identifying colic and initiating veterinary intervention. Understanding how owners think and act in relation to colic could assist veterinary surgeons in tailoring information about colic with the aim of improving colic outcomes. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was employed including qualitative in-depth interviews and a cross-sectional questionnaire. Qualitative data were analysed using Grounded theory to conceptualise processes involved in horse-owner management of colic. Following this, a cross-sectional survey was designed to test these concepts. Cluster analysis explored the role of the human-horse relationship upon colic management strategies. RESULTS: Fifteen horse-owners with a range of colic experience participated in the interviews. A theoretical conceptual model was developed and described how horse-owners’ recognised, assessed and responded to colic. Three main management strategies were used including ‘wait and see’, ‘lay treatments’ and ‘seek veterinary assistance’. Actions in response to colic were moderated by owners’ experience of colic and interpretation of the severity of colic signs. A postal questionnaire gathered data from 673 horse-owners from the North-West of the UK. The majority (605, 89.9%) of respondents were female. Cluster analysis revealed 5 meaningful groups of horse-owners based upon assessment of questionnaire items on the human-horse relationship. These groups included 2 professional and 3 amateur owner typologies. There were differences in the responses to some questionnaire items among the identified groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes lay understanding and management of colic among a population of horse-owners from the North-West of the UK. The information may serve as a basis upon which to tailor existing programmes designed to educate owners about colic management strategies, and may inform veterinarians’ interactions with horse-owners. BioMed Central 2014-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4122872/ /pubmed/25238026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-S1-S1 Text en Copyright © 2014 Scantlebury et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Scantlebury, Claire E
Perkins, Elizabeth
Pinchbeck, Gina L
Archer, Debra C
Christley, Robert M
Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic
title Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic
title_full Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic
title_fullStr Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic
title_full_unstemmed Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic
title_short Could it be colic? Horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic
title_sort could it be colic? horse-owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4122872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25238026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-S1-S1
work_keys_str_mv AT scantleburyclairee coulditbecolichorseownerdecisionmakingandpracticesinresponsetoequinecolic
AT perkinselizabeth coulditbecolichorseownerdecisionmakingandpracticesinresponsetoequinecolic
AT pinchbeckginal coulditbecolichorseownerdecisionmakingandpracticesinresponsetoequinecolic
AT archerdebrac coulditbecolichorseownerdecisionmakingandpracticesinresponsetoequinecolic
AT christleyrobertm coulditbecolichorseownerdecisionmakingandpracticesinresponsetoequinecolic