Cargando…

Family Size Evolution in Drosophila Chemosensory Gene Families: A Comparative Analysis with a Critical Appraisal of Methods

Gene turnover rates and the evolution of gene family sizes are important aspects of genome evolution. Here, we use curated sequence data of the major chemosensory gene families from Drosophila—the gustatory receptor, odorant receptor, ionotropic receptor, and odorant-binding protein families—to cond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almeida, Francisca C., Sánchez-Gracia, Alejandro, Campos, Jose Luis, Rozas, Julio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4122928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24951565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu130
_version_ 1782329419945213952
author Almeida, Francisca C.
Sánchez-Gracia, Alejandro
Campos, Jose Luis
Rozas, Julio
author_facet Almeida, Francisca C.
Sánchez-Gracia, Alejandro
Campos, Jose Luis
Rozas, Julio
author_sort Almeida, Francisca C.
collection PubMed
description Gene turnover rates and the evolution of gene family sizes are important aspects of genome evolution. Here, we use curated sequence data of the major chemosensory gene families from Drosophila—the gustatory receptor, odorant receptor, ionotropic receptor, and odorant-binding protein families—to conduct a comparative analysis among families, exploring different methods to estimate gene birth and death rates, including an ad hoc simulation study. Remarkably, we found that the state-of-the-art methods may produce very different rate estimates, which may lead to disparate conclusions regarding the evolution of chemosensory gene family sizes in Drosophila. Among biological factors, we found that a peculiarity of D. sechellia’s gene turnover rates was a major source of bias in global estimates, whereas gene conversion had negligible effects for the families analyzed herein. Turnover rates vary considerably among families, subfamilies, and ortholog groups although all analyzed families were quite dynamic in terms of gene turnover. Computer simulations showed that the methods that use ortholog group information appear to be the most accurate for the Drosophila chemosensory families. Most importantly, these results reveal the potential of rate heterogeneity among lineages to severely bias some turnover rate estimation methods and the need of further evaluating the performance of these methods in a more diverse sampling of gene families and phylogenetic contexts. Using branch-specific codon substitution models, we find further evidence of positive selection in recently duplicated genes, which attests to a nonneutral aspect of the gene birth-and-death process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4122928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41229282014-08-12 Family Size Evolution in Drosophila Chemosensory Gene Families: A Comparative Analysis with a Critical Appraisal of Methods Almeida, Francisca C. Sánchez-Gracia, Alejandro Campos, Jose Luis Rozas, Julio Genome Biol Evol Research Article Gene turnover rates and the evolution of gene family sizes are important aspects of genome evolution. Here, we use curated sequence data of the major chemosensory gene families from Drosophila—the gustatory receptor, odorant receptor, ionotropic receptor, and odorant-binding protein families—to conduct a comparative analysis among families, exploring different methods to estimate gene birth and death rates, including an ad hoc simulation study. Remarkably, we found that the state-of-the-art methods may produce very different rate estimates, which may lead to disparate conclusions regarding the evolution of chemosensory gene family sizes in Drosophila. Among biological factors, we found that a peculiarity of D. sechellia’s gene turnover rates was a major source of bias in global estimates, whereas gene conversion had negligible effects for the families analyzed herein. Turnover rates vary considerably among families, subfamilies, and ortholog groups although all analyzed families were quite dynamic in terms of gene turnover. Computer simulations showed that the methods that use ortholog group information appear to be the most accurate for the Drosophila chemosensory families. Most importantly, these results reveal the potential of rate heterogeneity among lineages to severely bias some turnover rate estimation methods and the need of further evaluating the performance of these methods in a more diverse sampling of gene families and phylogenetic contexts. Using branch-specific codon substitution models, we find further evidence of positive selection in recently duplicated genes, which attests to a nonneutral aspect of the gene birth-and-death process. Oxford University Press 2014-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4122928/ /pubmed/24951565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu130 Text en © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Almeida, Francisca C.
Sánchez-Gracia, Alejandro
Campos, Jose Luis
Rozas, Julio
Family Size Evolution in Drosophila Chemosensory Gene Families: A Comparative Analysis with a Critical Appraisal of Methods
title Family Size Evolution in Drosophila Chemosensory Gene Families: A Comparative Analysis with a Critical Appraisal of Methods
title_full Family Size Evolution in Drosophila Chemosensory Gene Families: A Comparative Analysis with a Critical Appraisal of Methods
title_fullStr Family Size Evolution in Drosophila Chemosensory Gene Families: A Comparative Analysis with a Critical Appraisal of Methods
title_full_unstemmed Family Size Evolution in Drosophila Chemosensory Gene Families: A Comparative Analysis with a Critical Appraisal of Methods
title_short Family Size Evolution in Drosophila Chemosensory Gene Families: A Comparative Analysis with a Critical Appraisal of Methods
title_sort family size evolution in drosophila chemosensory gene families: a comparative analysis with a critical appraisal of methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4122928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24951565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu130
work_keys_str_mv AT almeidafranciscac familysizeevolutionindrosophilachemosensorygenefamiliesacomparativeanalysiswithacriticalappraisalofmethods
AT sanchezgraciaalejandro familysizeevolutionindrosophilachemosensorygenefamiliesacomparativeanalysiswithacriticalappraisalofmethods
AT camposjoseluis familysizeevolutionindrosophilachemosensorygenefamiliesacomparativeanalysiswithacriticalappraisalofmethods
AT rozasjulio familysizeevolutionindrosophilachemosensorygenefamiliesacomparativeanalysiswithacriticalappraisalofmethods