Cargando…

Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens

R gene-mediated host resistance against apoplastic fungal pathogens is not adequately explained by the terms pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) or effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Therefore, it is proposed that this type of resistance is termed ‘effector-triggere...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stotz, Henrik U., Mitrousia, Georgia K., de Wit, Pierre J.G.M., Fitt, Bruce D.L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science, Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24856287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.009
_version_ 1782329473957363712
author Stotz, Henrik U.
Mitrousia, Georgia K.
de Wit, Pierre J.G.M.
Fitt, Bruce D.L.
author_facet Stotz, Henrik U.
Mitrousia, Georgia K.
de Wit, Pierre J.G.M.
Fitt, Bruce D.L.
author_sort Stotz, Henrik U.
collection PubMed
description R gene-mediated host resistance against apoplastic fungal pathogens is not adequately explained by the terms pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) or effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Therefore, it is proposed that this type of resistance is termed ‘effector-triggered defence’ (ETD). Unlike PTI and ETI, ETD is mediated by R genes encoding cell surface-localised receptor-like proteins (RLPs) that engage the receptor-like kinase SOBIR1. In contrast to this extracellular recognition, ETI is initiated by intracellular detection of pathogen effectors. ETI is usually associated with fast, hypersensitive host cell death, whereas ETD often triggers host cell death only after an elapsed period of endophytic pathogen growth. In this opinion, we focus on ETD responses against foliar fungal pathogens of crops.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4123193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier Science, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41231932014-08-07 Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens Stotz, Henrik U. Mitrousia, Georgia K. de Wit, Pierre J.G.M. Fitt, Bruce D.L. Trends Plant Sci Opinion R gene-mediated host resistance against apoplastic fungal pathogens is not adequately explained by the terms pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) or effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Therefore, it is proposed that this type of resistance is termed ‘effector-triggered defence’ (ETD). Unlike PTI and ETI, ETD is mediated by R genes encoding cell surface-localised receptor-like proteins (RLPs) that engage the receptor-like kinase SOBIR1. In contrast to this extracellular recognition, ETI is initiated by intracellular detection of pathogen effectors. ETI is usually associated with fast, hypersensitive host cell death, whereas ETD often triggers host cell death only after an elapsed period of endophytic pathogen growth. In this opinion, we focus on ETD responses against foliar fungal pathogens of crops. Elsevier Science, Ltd 2014-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4123193/ /pubmed/24856287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.009 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Opinion
Stotz, Henrik U.
Mitrousia, Georgia K.
de Wit, Pierre J.G.M.
Fitt, Bruce D.L.
Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens
title Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens
title_full Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens
title_fullStr Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens
title_full_unstemmed Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens
title_short Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens
title_sort effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24856287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.009
work_keys_str_mv AT stotzhenriku effectortriggereddefenceagainstapoplasticfungalpathogens
AT mitrousiageorgiak effectortriggereddefenceagainstapoplasticfungalpathogens
AT dewitpierrejgm effectortriggereddefenceagainstapoplasticfungalpathogens
AT fittbrucedl effectortriggereddefenceagainstapoplasticfungalpathogens