Cargando…
Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens
R gene-mediated host resistance against apoplastic fungal pathogens is not adequately explained by the terms pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) or effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Therefore, it is proposed that this type of resistance is termed ‘effector-triggere...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science, Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24856287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.009 |
_version_ | 1782329473957363712 |
---|---|
author | Stotz, Henrik U. Mitrousia, Georgia K. de Wit, Pierre J.G.M. Fitt, Bruce D.L. |
author_facet | Stotz, Henrik U. Mitrousia, Georgia K. de Wit, Pierre J.G.M. Fitt, Bruce D.L. |
author_sort | Stotz, Henrik U. |
collection | PubMed |
description | R gene-mediated host resistance against apoplastic fungal pathogens is not adequately explained by the terms pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) or effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Therefore, it is proposed that this type of resistance is termed ‘effector-triggered defence’ (ETD). Unlike PTI and ETI, ETD is mediated by R genes encoding cell surface-localised receptor-like proteins (RLPs) that engage the receptor-like kinase SOBIR1. In contrast to this extracellular recognition, ETI is initiated by intracellular detection of pathogen effectors. ETI is usually associated with fast, hypersensitive host cell death, whereas ETD often triggers host cell death only after an elapsed period of endophytic pathogen growth. In this opinion, we focus on ETD responses against foliar fungal pathogens of crops. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4123193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Elsevier Science, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41231932014-08-07 Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens Stotz, Henrik U. Mitrousia, Georgia K. de Wit, Pierre J.G.M. Fitt, Bruce D.L. Trends Plant Sci Opinion R gene-mediated host resistance against apoplastic fungal pathogens is not adequately explained by the terms pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) or effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Therefore, it is proposed that this type of resistance is termed ‘effector-triggered defence’ (ETD). Unlike PTI and ETI, ETD is mediated by R genes encoding cell surface-localised receptor-like proteins (RLPs) that engage the receptor-like kinase SOBIR1. In contrast to this extracellular recognition, ETI is initiated by intracellular detection of pathogen effectors. ETI is usually associated with fast, hypersensitive host cell death, whereas ETD often triggers host cell death only after an elapsed period of endophytic pathogen growth. In this opinion, we focus on ETD responses against foliar fungal pathogens of crops. Elsevier Science, Ltd 2014-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4123193/ /pubmed/24856287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.009 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Opinion Stotz, Henrik U. Mitrousia, Georgia K. de Wit, Pierre J.G.M. Fitt, Bruce D.L. Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens |
title | Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens |
title_full | Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens |
title_fullStr | Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens |
title_full_unstemmed | Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens |
title_short | Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens |
title_sort | effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens |
topic | Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24856287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stotzhenriku effectortriggereddefenceagainstapoplasticfungalpathogens AT mitrousiageorgiak effectortriggereddefenceagainstapoplasticfungalpathogens AT dewitpierrejgm effectortriggereddefenceagainstapoplasticfungalpathogens AT fittbrucedl effectortriggereddefenceagainstapoplasticfungalpathogens |