Cargando…

Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment

Postactivation potentiation (PAP) is known to enhance force production. Maximal isometric strength assessment protocols usually consist of two or more maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs). The objective of this study was to determine if PAP would influence isometric strength assessment. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lima, Leonardo Coelho Rabello, Oliveira, Felipe Bruno Dias, Oliveira, Thiago Pires, Assumpção, Claudio de Oliveira, Greco, Camila Coelho, Cardozo, Adalgiso Croscato, Denadai, Benedito Sérgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25133157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/126961
_version_ 1782329497752698880
author Lima, Leonardo Coelho Rabello
Oliveira, Felipe Bruno Dias
Oliveira, Thiago Pires
Assumpção, Claudio de Oliveira
Greco, Camila Coelho
Cardozo, Adalgiso Croscato
Denadai, Benedito Sérgio
author_facet Lima, Leonardo Coelho Rabello
Oliveira, Felipe Bruno Dias
Oliveira, Thiago Pires
Assumpção, Claudio de Oliveira
Greco, Camila Coelho
Cardozo, Adalgiso Croscato
Denadai, Benedito Sérgio
author_sort Lima, Leonardo Coelho Rabello
collection PubMed
description Postactivation potentiation (PAP) is known to enhance force production. Maximal isometric strength assessment protocols usually consist of two or more maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs). The objective of this study was to determine if PAP would influence isometric strength assessment. Healthy male volunteers (n = 23) performed two five-second MVCs separated by a 180-seconds interval. Changes in isometric peak torque (IPT), time to achieve it (tPTI), contractile impulse (CI), root mean square of the electromyographic signal during PTI (RMS), and rate of torque development (RTD), in different intervals, were measured. Significant increases in IPT (240.6 ± 55.7 N·m versus 248.9 ± 55.1 N·m), RTD (746 ± 152 N·m·s(−1) versus 727 ± 158 N·m·s(−1)), and RMS (59.1 ± 12.2% RMS(MAX)   versus 54.8 ± 9.4% RMS(MAX)) were found on the second MVC. tPTI decreased significantly on the second MVC (2373 ± 1200 ms versus 2784 ± 1226 ms). We conclude that a first MVC leads to PAP that elicits significant enhancements in strength-related variables of a second MVC performed 180 seconds later. If disconsidered, this phenomenon might bias maximal isometric strength assessment, overestimating some of these variables.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4123488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41234882014-08-17 Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment Lima, Leonardo Coelho Rabello Oliveira, Felipe Bruno Dias Oliveira, Thiago Pires Assumpção, Claudio de Oliveira Greco, Camila Coelho Cardozo, Adalgiso Croscato Denadai, Benedito Sérgio Biomed Res Int Research Article Postactivation potentiation (PAP) is known to enhance force production. Maximal isometric strength assessment protocols usually consist of two or more maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs). The objective of this study was to determine if PAP would influence isometric strength assessment. Healthy male volunteers (n = 23) performed two five-second MVCs separated by a 180-seconds interval. Changes in isometric peak torque (IPT), time to achieve it (tPTI), contractile impulse (CI), root mean square of the electromyographic signal during PTI (RMS), and rate of torque development (RTD), in different intervals, were measured. Significant increases in IPT (240.6 ± 55.7 N·m versus 248.9 ± 55.1 N·m), RTD (746 ± 152 N·m·s(−1) versus 727 ± 158 N·m·s(−1)), and RMS (59.1 ± 12.2% RMS(MAX)   versus 54.8 ± 9.4% RMS(MAX)) were found on the second MVC. tPTI decreased significantly on the second MVC (2373 ± 1200 ms versus 2784 ± 1226 ms). We conclude that a first MVC leads to PAP that elicits significant enhancements in strength-related variables of a second MVC performed 180 seconds later. If disconsidered, this phenomenon might bias maximal isometric strength assessment, overestimating some of these variables. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4123488/ /pubmed/25133157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/126961 Text en Copyright © 2014 Leonardo Coelho Rabello Lima et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lima, Leonardo Coelho Rabello
Oliveira, Felipe Bruno Dias
Oliveira, Thiago Pires
Assumpção, Claudio de Oliveira
Greco, Camila Coelho
Cardozo, Adalgiso Croscato
Denadai, Benedito Sérgio
Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment
title Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment
title_full Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment
title_fullStr Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment
title_short Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment
title_sort postactivation potentiation biases maximal isometric strength assessment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25133157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/126961
work_keys_str_mv AT limaleonardocoelhorabello postactivationpotentiationbiasesmaximalisometricstrengthassessment
AT oliveirafelipebrunodias postactivationpotentiationbiasesmaximalisometricstrengthassessment
AT oliveirathiagopires postactivationpotentiationbiasesmaximalisometricstrengthassessment
AT assumpcaoclaudiodeoliveira postactivationpotentiationbiasesmaximalisometricstrengthassessment
AT grecocamilacoelho postactivationpotentiationbiasesmaximalisometricstrengthassessment
AT cardozoadalgisocroscato postactivationpotentiationbiasesmaximalisometricstrengthassessment
AT denadaibeneditosergio postactivationpotentiationbiasesmaximalisometricstrengthassessment