Cargando…
Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment
Postactivation potentiation (PAP) is known to enhance force production. Maximal isometric strength assessment protocols usually consist of two or more maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs). The objective of this study was to determine if PAP would influence isometric strength assessment. H...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25133157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/126961 |
_version_ | 1782329497752698880 |
---|---|
author | Lima, Leonardo Coelho Rabello Oliveira, Felipe Bruno Dias Oliveira, Thiago Pires Assumpção, Claudio de Oliveira Greco, Camila Coelho Cardozo, Adalgiso Croscato Denadai, Benedito Sérgio |
author_facet | Lima, Leonardo Coelho Rabello Oliveira, Felipe Bruno Dias Oliveira, Thiago Pires Assumpção, Claudio de Oliveira Greco, Camila Coelho Cardozo, Adalgiso Croscato Denadai, Benedito Sérgio |
author_sort | Lima, Leonardo Coelho Rabello |
collection | PubMed |
description | Postactivation potentiation (PAP) is known to enhance force production. Maximal isometric strength assessment protocols usually consist of two or more maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs). The objective of this study was to determine if PAP would influence isometric strength assessment. Healthy male volunteers (n = 23) performed two five-second MVCs separated by a 180-seconds interval. Changes in isometric peak torque (IPT), time to achieve it (tPTI), contractile impulse (CI), root mean square of the electromyographic signal during PTI (RMS), and rate of torque development (RTD), in different intervals, were measured. Significant increases in IPT (240.6 ± 55.7 N·m versus 248.9 ± 55.1 N·m), RTD (746 ± 152 N·m·s(−1) versus 727 ± 158 N·m·s(−1)), and RMS (59.1 ± 12.2% RMS(MAX) versus 54.8 ± 9.4% RMS(MAX)) were found on the second MVC. tPTI decreased significantly on the second MVC (2373 ± 1200 ms versus 2784 ± 1226 ms). We conclude that a first MVC leads to PAP that elicits significant enhancements in strength-related variables of a second MVC performed 180 seconds later. If disconsidered, this phenomenon might bias maximal isometric strength assessment, overestimating some of these variables. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4123488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41234882014-08-17 Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment Lima, Leonardo Coelho Rabello Oliveira, Felipe Bruno Dias Oliveira, Thiago Pires Assumpção, Claudio de Oliveira Greco, Camila Coelho Cardozo, Adalgiso Croscato Denadai, Benedito Sérgio Biomed Res Int Research Article Postactivation potentiation (PAP) is known to enhance force production. Maximal isometric strength assessment protocols usually consist of two or more maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs). The objective of this study was to determine if PAP would influence isometric strength assessment. Healthy male volunteers (n = 23) performed two five-second MVCs separated by a 180-seconds interval. Changes in isometric peak torque (IPT), time to achieve it (tPTI), contractile impulse (CI), root mean square of the electromyographic signal during PTI (RMS), and rate of torque development (RTD), in different intervals, were measured. Significant increases in IPT (240.6 ± 55.7 N·m versus 248.9 ± 55.1 N·m), RTD (746 ± 152 N·m·s(−1) versus 727 ± 158 N·m·s(−1)), and RMS (59.1 ± 12.2% RMS(MAX) versus 54.8 ± 9.4% RMS(MAX)) were found on the second MVC. tPTI decreased significantly on the second MVC (2373 ± 1200 ms versus 2784 ± 1226 ms). We conclude that a first MVC leads to PAP that elicits significant enhancements in strength-related variables of a second MVC performed 180 seconds later. If disconsidered, this phenomenon might bias maximal isometric strength assessment, overestimating some of these variables. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4123488/ /pubmed/25133157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/126961 Text en Copyright © 2014 Leonardo Coelho Rabello Lima et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lima, Leonardo Coelho Rabello Oliveira, Felipe Bruno Dias Oliveira, Thiago Pires Assumpção, Claudio de Oliveira Greco, Camila Coelho Cardozo, Adalgiso Croscato Denadai, Benedito Sérgio Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment |
title | Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment |
title_full | Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment |
title_fullStr | Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment |
title_short | Postactivation Potentiation Biases Maximal Isometric Strength Assessment |
title_sort | postactivation potentiation biases maximal isometric strength assessment |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25133157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/126961 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limaleonardocoelhorabello postactivationpotentiationbiasesmaximalisometricstrengthassessment AT oliveirafelipebrunodias postactivationpotentiationbiasesmaximalisometricstrengthassessment AT oliveirathiagopires postactivationpotentiationbiasesmaximalisometricstrengthassessment AT assumpcaoclaudiodeoliveira postactivationpotentiationbiasesmaximalisometricstrengthassessment AT grecocamilacoelho postactivationpotentiationbiasesmaximalisometricstrengthassessment AT cardozoadalgisocroscato postactivationpotentiationbiasesmaximalisometricstrengthassessment AT denadaibeneditosergio postactivationpotentiationbiasesmaximalisometricstrengthassessment |