Cargando…
Comparison of Different Blood Collection, Sample Matrix, and Immunoassay Methods in a Prenatal Screening Setting
We compared how measurements of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and the free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (fβ-hCG) in maternal blood are influenced by different methods for blood collection, sample matrix, and immunoassay platform. Serum and dried blood spots (DBS) wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25132703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/509821 |
_version_ | 1782329504802275328 |
---|---|
author | Pennings, Jeroen L. A. Siljee, Jacqueline E. Imholz, Sandra Kuc, Sylwia de Vries, Annemieke Schielen, Peter C. J. I. Rodenburg, Wendy |
author_facet | Pennings, Jeroen L. A. Siljee, Jacqueline E. Imholz, Sandra Kuc, Sylwia de Vries, Annemieke Schielen, Peter C. J. I. Rodenburg, Wendy |
author_sort | Pennings, Jeroen L. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We compared how measurements of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and the free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (fβ-hCG) in maternal blood are influenced by different methods for blood collection, sample matrix, and immunoassay platform. Serum and dried blood spots (DBS) were obtained by venipuncture and by finger prick of 19 pregnant women. PAPP-A and fβ-hCG from serum and from DBS were measured by conventional indirect immunoassay on an AutoDELFIA platform and by antibody microarray. We compared methods based on the recoveries for both markers as well as marker levels correlations across samples. All method comparisons showed high correlations for both marker concentrations. Recovery levels of PAPP-A from DBS were 30% lower, while those of fβ-hCG from DBS were 50% higher compared to conventional venipuncture serum. The recoveries were not affected by blood collection or immunoassay method. The high correlation coefficients for both markers indicate that DBS from finger prick can be used reliably in a prenatal screening setting, as a less costly and minimally invasive alternative for venipuncture serum, with great logistical advantages. Additionally, the use of antibody arrays will allow for extending the number of first trimester screening markers on maternal and fetal health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4123521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41235212014-08-17 Comparison of Different Blood Collection, Sample Matrix, and Immunoassay Methods in a Prenatal Screening Setting Pennings, Jeroen L. A. Siljee, Jacqueline E. Imholz, Sandra Kuc, Sylwia de Vries, Annemieke Schielen, Peter C. J. I. Rodenburg, Wendy Dis Markers Research Article We compared how measurements of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and the free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (fβ-hCG) in maternal blood are influenced by different methods for blood collection, sample matrix, and immunoassay platform. Serum and dried blood spots (DBS) were obtained by venipuncture and by finger prick of 19 pregnant women. PAPP-A and fβ-hCG from serum and from DBS were measured by conventional indirect immunoassay on an AutoDELFIA platform and by antibody microarray. We compared methods based on the recoveries for both markers as well as marker levels correlations across samples. All method comparisons showed high correlations for both marker concentrations. Recovery levels of PAPP-A from DBS were 30% lower, while those of fβ-hCG from DBS were 50% higher compared to conventional venipuncture serum. The recoveries were not affected by blood collection or immunoassay method. The high correlation coefficients for both markers indicate that DBS from finger prick can be used reliably in a prenatal screening setting, as a less costly and minimally invasive alternative for venipuncture serum, with great logistical advantages. Additionally, the use of antibody arrays will allow for extending the number of first trimester screening markers on maternal and fetal health. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4123521/ /pubmed/25132703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/509821 Text en Copyright © 2014 Jeroen L. A. Pennings et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pennings, Jeroen L. A. Siljee, Jacqueline E. Imholz, Sandra Kuc, Sylwia de Vries, Annemieke Schielen, Peter C. J. I. Rodenburg, Wendy Comparison of Different Blood Collection, Sample Matrix, and Immunoassay Methods in a Prenatal Screening Setting |
title | Comparison of Different Blood Collection, Sample Matrix, and Immunoassay Methods in a Prenatal Screening Setting |
title_full | Comparison of Different Blood Collection, Sample Matrix, and Immunoassay Methods in a Prenatal Screening Setting |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Different Blood Collection, Sample Matrix, and Immunoassay Methods in a Prenatal Screening Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Different Blood Collection, Sample Matrix, and Immunoassay Methods in a Prenatal Screening Setting |
title_short | Comparison of Different Blood Collection, Sample Matrix, and Immunoassay Methods in a Prenatal Screening Setting |
title_sort | comparison of different blood collection, sample matrix, and immunoassay methods in a prenatal screening setting |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25132703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/509821 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT penningsjeroenla comparisonofdifferentbloodcollectionsamplematrixandimmunoassaymethodsinaprenatalscreeningsetting AT siljeejacquelinee comparisonofdifferentbloodcollectionsamplematrixandimmunoassaymethodsinaprenatalscreeningsetting AT imholzsandra comparisonofdifferentbloodcollectionsamplematrixandimmunoassaymethodsinaprenatalscreeningsetting AT kucsylwia comparisonofdifferentbloodcollectionsamplematrixandimmunoassaymethodsinaprenatalscreeningsetting AT devriesannemieke comparisonofdifferentbloodcollectionsamplematrixandimmunoassaymethodsinaprenatalscreeningsetting AT schielenpetercji comparisonofdifferentbloodcollectionsamplematrixandimmunoassaymethodsinaprenatalscreeningsetting AT rodenburgwendy comparisonofdifferentbloodcollectionsamplematrixandimmunoassaymethodsinaprenatalscreeningsetting |