Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction

AIM: To compare the outcomes of finger reconstruction using arterialized venous flap (AVF), superficial palmar branch of the radial artery (SPBRA) flap, posterior interosseous perforator flap (PIPF), and ulnar artery perforator free (UAPF) flap harvested from the ipsilateral extremity. METHODS: We r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yujie, Jiao, Hongsheng, Ji, Xiang, Liu, Chunlei, Zhong, Xiaopen, Zhang, Hongxun, Ding, Xiaohen, Cao, Xuecheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25098605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104014
_version_ 1782329553791746048
author Liu, Yujie
Jiao, Hongsheng
Ji, Xiang
Liu, Chunlei
Zhong, Xiaopen
Zhang, Hongxun
Ding, Xiaohen
Cao, Xuecheng
author_facet Liu, Yujie
Jiao, Hongsheng
Ji, Xiang
Liu, Chunlei
Zhong, Xiaopen
Zhang, Hongxun
Ding, Xiaohen
Cao, Xuecheng
author_sort Liu, Yujie
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the outcomes of finger reconstruction using arterialized venous flap (AVF), superficial palmar branch of the radial artery (SPBRA) flap, posterior interosseous perforator flap (PIPF), and ulnar artery perforator free (UAPF) flap harvested from the ipsilateral extremity. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes for 41 free flaps from the ipsilateral extremity in the reconstruction of finger defects in 41 patients with small/moderate skin defects, including 11 AVFs, 10 SPBRA flaps, 10 PIPFs, and 10 UAPF flaps. Standardized assessment of outcomes was performed, including duration of operation, objective sensory recovery, cold intolerance, time of returning to work, active total range of motion (ROM) of the injured fingers, and the cosmetic appearance of the donor/recipient sites. RESULTS: All flaps survived completely, and the follow-up duration was 13.5 months. The mean duration of the complete surgical procedure for AVFs was distinctly shorter than that of the other flaps (p<0.05). AVFs were employed to reconstruct skin defects and extensor tendon defects using a vascularized palmaris longus graft in 4 fingers. Digital blood supply was reestablished in 4 fingers by flow-through technique when using AVFs. Optimal sensory recovery was better with AVFs and SPBRA flaps as compared with UAPF flaps and PIPFs (p<0.05). No significant differences were noted in ROM or cold intolerance between the 4 groups. Optimal cosmetic satisfaction was noted for the recipient sites of AVFs and the donor sites of SPBRA flaps. The number of second-stage defatting operations required for AVFs was considerably lesser than that for the other flaps. CONCLUSION: All 4 types of free flaps from the ipsilateral extremity are a practical choice in finger reconstruction for small/moderate-sized skin defects. AVFs play an important role in such operations due to the wider indications, and better sensory recovery and cosmetic appearance associated with this method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4123926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41239262014-08-12 A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction Liu, Yujie Jiao, Hongsheng Ji, Xiang Liu, Chunlei Zhong, Xiaopen Zhang, Hongxun Ding, Xiaohen Cao, Xuecheng PLoS One Research Article AIM: To compare the outcomes of finger reconstruction using arterialized venous flap (AVF), superficial palmar branch of the radial artery (SPBRA) flap, posterior interosseous perforator flap (PIPF), and ulnar artery perforator free (UAPF) flap harvested from the ipsilateral extremity. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes for 41 free flaps from the ipsilateral extremity in the reconstruction of finger defects in 41 patients with small/moderate skin defects, including 11 AVFs, 10 SPBRA flaps, 10 PIPFs, and 10 UAPF flaps. Standardized assessment of outcomes was performed, including duration of operation, objective sensory recovery, cold intolerance, time of returning to work, active total range of motion (ROM) of the injured fingers, and the cosmetic appearance of the donor/recipient sites. RESULTS: All flaps survived completely, and the follow-up duration was 13.5 months. The mean duration of the complete surgical procedure for AVFs was distinctly shorter than that of the other flaps (p<0.05). AVFs were employed to reconstruct skin defects and extensor tendon defects using a vascularized palmaris longus graft in 4 fingers. Digital blood supply was reestablished in 4 fingers by flow-through technique when using AVFs. Optimal sensory recovery was better with AVFs and SPBRA flaps as compared with UAPF flaps and PIPFs (p<0.05). No significant differences were noted in ROM or cold intolerance between the 4 groups. Optimal cosmetic satisfaction was noted for the recipient sites of AVFs and the donor sites of SPBRA flaps. The number of second-stage defatting operations required for AVFs was considerably lesser than that for the other flaps. CONCLUSION: All 4 types of free flaps from the ipsilateral extremity are a practical choice in finger reconstruction for small/moderate-sized skin defects. AVFs play an important role in such operations due to the wider indications, and better sensory recovery and cosmetic appearance associated with this method. Public Library of Science 2014-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4123926/ /pubmed/25098605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104014 Text en © 2014 Liu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Yujie
Jiao, Hongsheng
Ji, Xiang
Liu, Chunlei
Zhong, Xiaopen
Zhang, Hongxun
Ding, Xiaohen
Cao, Xuecheng
A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction
title A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction
title_full A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction
title_short A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction
title_sort comparative study of four types of free flaps from the ipsilateral extremity for finger reconstruction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25098605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104014
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyujie acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT jiaohongsheng acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT jixiang acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT liuchunlei acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT zhongxiaopen acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT zhanghongxun acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT dingxiaohen acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT caoxuecheng acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT liuyujie comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT jiaohongsheng comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT jixiang comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT liuchunlei comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT zhongxiaopen comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT zhanghongxun comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT dingxiaohen comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction
AT caoxuecheng comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction