Cargando…
A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction
AIM: To compare the outcomes of finger reconstruction using arterialized venous flap (AVF), superficial palmar branch of the radial artery (SPBRA) flap, posterior interosseous perforator flap (PIPF), and ulnar artery perforator free (UAPF) flap harvested from the ipsilateral extremity. METHODS: We r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25098605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104014 |
_version_ | 1782329553791746048 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Yujie Jiao, Hongsheng Ji, Xiang Liu, Chunlei Zhong, Xiaopen Zhang, Hongxun Ding, Xiaohen Cao, Xuecheng |
author_facet | Liu, Yujie Jiao, Hongsheng Ji, Xiang Liu, Chunlei Zhong, Xiaopen Zhang, Hongxun Ding, Xiaohen Cao, Xuecheng |
author_sort | Liu, Yujie |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To compare the outcomes of finger reconstruction using arterialized venous flap (AVF), superficial palmar branch of the radial artery (SPBRA) flap, posterior interosseous perforator flap (PIPF), and ulnar artery perforator free (UAPF) flap harvested from the ipsilateral extremity. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes for 41 free flaps from the ipsilateral extremity in the reconstruction of finger defects in 41 patients with small/moderate skin defects, including 11 AVFs, 10 SPBRA flaps, 10 PIPFs, and 10 UAPF flaps. Standardized assessment of outcomes was performed, including duration of operation, objective sensory recovery, cold intolerance, time of returning to work, active total range of motion (ROM) of the injured fingers, and the cosmetic appearance of the donor/recipient sites. RESULTS: All flaps survived completely, and the follow-up duration was 13.5 months. The mean duration of the complete surgical procedure for AVFs was distinctly shorter than that of the other flaps (p<0.05). AVFs were employed to reconstruct skin defects and extensor tendon defects using a vascularized palmaris longus graft in 4 fingers. Digital blood supply was reestablished in 4 fingers by flow-through technique when using AVFs. Optimal sensory recovery was better with AVFs and SPBRA flaps as compared with UAPF flaps and PIPFs (p<0.05). No significant differences were noted in ROM or cold intolerance between the 4 groups. Optimal cosmetic satisfaction was noted for the recipient sites of AVFs and the donor sites of SPBRA flaps. The number of second-stage defatting operations required for AVFs was considerably lesser than that for the other flaps. CONCLUSION: All 4 types of free flaps from the ipsilateral extremity are a practical choice in finger reconstruction for small/moderate-sized skin defects. AVFs play an important role in such operations due to the wider indications, and better sensory recovery and cosmetic appearance associated with this method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4123926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41239262014-08-12 A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction Liu, Yujie Jiao, Hongsheng Ji, Xiang Liu, Chunlei Zhong, Xiaopen Zhang, Hongxun Ding, Xiaohen Cao, Xuecheng PLoS One Research Article AIM: To compare the outcomes of finger reconstruction using arterialized venous flap (AVF), superficial palmar branch of the radial artery (SPBRA) flap, posterior interosseous perforator flap (PIPF), and ulnar artery perforator free (UAPF) flap harvested from the ipsilateral extremity. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes for 41 free flaps from the ipsilateral extremity in the reconstruction of finger defects in 41 patients with small/moderate skin defects, including 11 AVFs, 10 SPBRA flaps, 10 PIPFs, and 10 UAPF flaps. Standardized assessment of outcomes was performed, including duration of operation, objective sensory recovery, cold intolerance, time of returning to work, active total range of motion (ROM) of the injured fingers, and the cosmetic appearance of the donor/recipient sites. RESULTS: All flaps survived completely, and the follow-up duration was 13.5 months. The mean duration of the complete surgical procedure for AVFs was distinctly shorter than that of the other flaps (p<0.05). AVFs were employed to reconstruct skin defects and extensor tendon defects using a vascularized palmaris longus graft in 4 fingers. Digital blood supply was reestablished in 4 fingers by flow-through technique when using AVFs. Optimal sensory recovery was better with AVFs and SPBRA flaps as compared with UAPF flaps and PIPFs (p<0.05). No significant differences were noted in ROM or cold intolerance between the 4 groups. Optimal cosmetic satisfaction was noted for the recipient sites of AVFs and the donor sites of SPBRA flaps. The number of second-stage defatting operations required for AVFs was considerably lesser than that for the other flaps. CONCLUSION: All 4 types of free flaps from the ipsilateral extremity are a practical choice in finger reconstruction for small/moderate-sized skin defects. AVFs play an important role in such operations due to the wider indications, and better sensory recovery and cosmetic appearance associated with this method. Public Library of Science 2014-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4123926/ /pubmed/25098605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104014 Text en © 2014 Liu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Yujie Jiao, Hongsheng Ji, Xiang Liu, Chunlei Zhong, Xiaopen Zhang, Hongxun Ding, Xiaohen Cao, Xuecheng A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction |
title | A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction |
title_full | A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction |
title_short | A Comparative Study of Four Types of Free Flaps from the Ipsilateral Extremity for Finger Reconstruction |
title_sort | comparative study of four types of free flaps from the ipsilateral extremity for finger reconstruction |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25098605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyujie acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT jiaohongsheng acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT jixiang acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT liuchunlei acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT zhongxiaopen acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT zhanghongxun acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT dingxiaohen acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT caoxuecheng acomparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT liuyujie comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT jiaohongsheng comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT jixiang comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT liuchunlei comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT zhongxiaopen comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT zhanghongxun comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT dingxiaohen comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction AT caoxuecheng comparativestudyoffourtypesoffreeflapsfromtheipsilateralextremityforfingerreconstruction |