Cargando…

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China

Drip irrigation is broadly extended in order to save water in the arid cotton production region of China. Biochar is thought to be a useful soil amendment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Here, a field study was conducted to compare the emissions of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) and methane (CH(4))...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Jie, Guo, Wei, Feng, Jinfei, Li, Lanhai, Yang, Haishui, Wang, Xiaohua, Bian, Xinmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4124752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25133229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/407832
_version_ 1782329667046342656
author Wu, Jie
Guo, Wei
Feng, Jinfei
Li, Lanhai
Yang, Haishui
Wang, Xiaohua
Bian, Xinmin
author_facet Wu, Jie
Guo, Wei
Feng, Jinfei
Li, Lanhai
Yang, Haishui
Wang, Xiaohua
Bian, Xinmin
author_sort Wu, Jie
collection PubMed
description Drip irrigation is broadly extended in order to save water in the arid cotton production region of China. Biochar is thought to be a useful soil amendment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Here, a field study was conducted to compare the emissions of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) and methane (CH(4)) under different irrigation methods (drip irrigation (D) and furrow irrigation (F)) and fertilization regimes (conventional fertilization (C) and conventional fertilization + biochar (B)) during the cotton growth season. The accumulated N(2)O emissions were significantly lower with FB, DC, and DB than with FC by 28.8%, 36.1%, and 37.6%, while accumulated CH(4) uptake was 264.5%, 226.7%, and 154.2% higher with DC, DB, and FC than that with FB, respectively. Irrigation methods showed a significant effect on total global warming potential (GWP) and yield-scaled GWP (P < 0.01). DC and DB showed higher cotton yield, water use efficiency (WUE), and lower yield-scaled GWP, as compared with FC and FB. This suggests that in northwestern China mulched-drip irrigation should be a better approach to increase cotton yield with depressed GHG. In addition, biochar addition increased CH(4) emissions while it decreased N(2)O emissions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4124752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41247522014-08-17 Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China Wu, Jie Guo, Wei Feng, Jinfei Li, Lanhai Yang, Haishui Wang, Xiaohua Bian, Xinmin ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Drip irrigation is broadly extended in order to save water in the arid cotton production region of China. Biochar is thought to be a useful soil amendment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Here, a field study was conducted to compare the emissions of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) and methane (CH(4)) under different irrigation methods (drip irrigation (D) and furrow irrigation (F)) and fertilization regimes (conventional fertilization (C) and conventional fertilization + biochar (B)) during the cotton growth season. The accumulated N(2)O emissions were significantly lower with FB, DC, and DB than with FC by 28.8%, 36.1%, and 37.6%, while accumulated CH(4) uptake was 264.5%, 226.7%, and 154.2% higher with DC, DB, and FC than that with FB, respectively. Irrigation methods showed a significant effect on total global warming potential (GWP) and yield-scaled GWP (P < 0.01). DC and DB showed higher cotton yield, water use efficiency (WUE), and lower yield-scaled GWP, as compared with FC and FB. This suggests that in northwestern China mulched-drip irrigation should be a better approach to increase cotton yield with depressed GHG. In addition, biochar addition increased CH(4) emissions while it decreased N(2)O emissions. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4124752/ /pubmed/25133229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/407832 Text en Copyright © 2014 Jie Wu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Jie
Guo, Wei
Feng, Jinfei
Li, Lanhai
Yang, Haishui
Wang, Xiaohua
Bian, Xinmin
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China
title Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China
title_full Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China
title_fullStr Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China
title_full_unstemmed Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China
title_short Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China
title_sort greenhouse gas emissions from cotton field under different irrigation methods and fertilization regimes in arid northwestern china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4124752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25133229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/407832
work_keys_str_mv AT wujie greenhousegasemissionsfromcottonfieldunderdifferentirrigationmethodsandfertilizationregimesinaridnorthwesternchina
AT guowei greenhousegasemissionsfromcottonfieldunderdifferentirrigationmethodsandfertilizationregimesinaridnorthwesternchina
AT fengjinfei greenhousegasemissionsfromcottonfieldunderdifferentirrigationmethodsandfertilizationregimesinaridnorthwesternchina
AT lilanhai greenhousegasemissionsfromcottonfieldunderdifferentirrigationmethodsandfertilizationregimesinaridnorthwesternchina
AT yanghaishui greenhousegasemissionsfromcottonfieldunderdifferentirrigationmethodsandfertilizationregimesinaridnorthwesternchina
AT wangxiaohua greenhousegasemissionsfromcottonfieldunderdifferentirrigationmethodsandfertilizationregimesinaridnorthwesternchina
AT bianxinmin greenhousegasemissionsfromcottonfieldunderdifferentirrigationmethodsandfertilizationregimesinaridnorthwesternchina