Cargando…
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China
Drip irrigation is broadly extended in order to save water in the arid cotton production region of China. Biochar is thought to be a useful soil amendment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Here, a field study was conducted to compare the emissions of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) and methane (CH(4))...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4124752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25133229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/407832 |
_version_ | 1782329667046342656 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Jie Guo, Wei Feng, Jinfei Li, Lanhai Yang, Haishui Wang, Xiaohua Bian, Xinmin |
author_facet | Wu, Jie Guo, Wei Feng, Jinfei Li, Lanhai Yang, Haishui Wang, Xiaohua Bian, Xinmin |
author_sort | Wu, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Drip irrigation is broadly extended in order to save water in the arid cotton production region of China. Biochar is thought to be a useful soil amendment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Here, a field study was conducted to compare the emissions of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) and methane (CH(4)) under different irrigation methods (drip irrigation (D) and furrow irrigation (F)) and fertilization regimes (conventional fertilization (C) and conventional fertilization + biochar (B)) during the cotton growth season. The accumulated N(2)O emissions were significantly lower with FB, DC, and DB than with FC by 28.8%, 36.1%, and 37.6%, while accumulated CH(4) uptake was 264.5%, 226.7%, and 154.2% higher with DC, DB, and FC than that with FB, respectively. Irrigation methods showed a significant effect on total global warming potential (GWP) and yield-scaled GWP (P < 0.01). DC and DB showed higher cotton yield, water use efficiency (WUE), and lower yield-scaled GWP, as compared with FC and FB. This suggests that in northwestern China mulched-drip irrigation should be a better approach to increase cotton yield with depressed GHG. In addition, biochar addition increased CH(4) emissions while it decreased N(2)O emissions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4124752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41247522014-08-17 Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China Wu, Jie Guo, Wei Feng, Jinfei Li, Lanhai Yang, Haishui Wang, Xiaohua Bian, Xinmin ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Drip irrigation is broadly extended in order to save water in the arid cotton production region of China. Biochar is thought to be a useful soil amendment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Here, a field study was conducted to compare the emissions of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) and methane (CH(4)) under different irrigation methods (drip irrigation (D) and furrow irrigation (F)) and fertilization regimes (conventional fertilization (C) and conventional fertilization + biochar (B)) during the cotton growth season. The accumulated N(2)O emissions were significantly lower with FB, DC, and DB than with FC by 28.8%, 36.1%, and 37.6%, while accumulated CH(4) uptake was 264.5%, 226.7%, and 154.2% higher with DC, DB, and FC than that with FB, respectively. Irrigation methods showed a significant effect on total global warming potential (GWP) and yield-scaled GWP (P < 0.01). DC and DB showed higher cotton yield, water use efficiency (WUE), and lower yield-scaled GWP, as compared with FC and FB. This suggests that in northwestern China mulched-drip irrigation should be a better approach to increase cotton yield with depressed GHG. In addition, biochar addition increased CH(4) emissions while it decreased N(2)O emissions. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4124752/ /pubmed/25133229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/407832 Text en Copyright © 2014 Jie Wu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wu, Jie Guo, Wei Feng, Jinfei Li, Lanhai Yang, Haishui Wang, Xiaohua Bian, Xinmin Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China |
title | Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China |
title_full | Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China |
title_fullStr | Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China |
title_full_unstemmed | Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China |
title_short | Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cotton Field under Different Irrigation Methods and Fertilization Regimes in Arid Northwestern China |
title_sort | greenhouse gas emissions from cotton field under different irrigation methods and fertilization regimes in arid northwestern china |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4124752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25133229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/407832 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wujie greenhousegasemissionsfromcottonfieldunderdifferentirrigationmethodsandfertilizationregimesinaridnorthwesternchina AT guowei greenhousegasemissionsfromcottonfieldunderdifferentirrigationmethodsandfertilizationregimesinaridnorthwesternchina AT fengjinfei greenhousegasemissionsfromcottonfieldunderdifferentirrigationmethodsandfertilizationregimesinaridnorthwesternchina AT lilanhai greenhousegasemissionsfromcottonfieldunderdifferentirrigationmethodsandfertilizationregimesinaridnorthwesternchina AT yanghaishui greenhousegasemissionsfromcottonfieldunderdifferentirrigationmethodsandfertilizationregimesinaridnorthwesternchina AT wangxiaohua greenhousegasemissionsfromcottonfieldunderdifferentirrigationmethodsandfertilizationregimesinaridnorthwesternchina AT bianxinmin greenhousegasemissionsfromcottonfieldunderdifferentirrigationmethodsandfertilizationregimesinaridnorthwesternchina |