Cargando…

Acute In Vivo Response to an Alternative Implant for Urogynecology

Purpose. To investigate in vivo the acute host response to an alternative implant designed for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods. A biodegradable scaffold was produced from poly-L-lactic acid (PLA) using the electrospinning technique. Human a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roman Regueros, Sabiniano, Albersen, Maarten, Manodoro, Stefano, Zia, Silvia, Osman, Nadir I., Bullock, Anthony J., Chapple, Christopher R., Deprest, Jan, MacNeil, Sheila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4124768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25136633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/853610
_version_ 1782329670451068928
author Roman Regueros, Sabiniano
Albersen, Maarten
Manodoro, Stefano
Zia, Silvia
Osman, Nadir I.
Bullock, Anthony J.
Chapple, Christopher R.
Deprest, Jan
MacNeil, Sheila
author_facet Roman Regueros, Sabiniano
Albersen, Maarten
Manodoro, Stefano
Zia, Silvia
Osman, Nadir I.
Bullock, Anthony J.
Chapple, Christopher R.
Deprest, Jan
MacNeil, Sheila
author_sort Roman Regueros, Sabiniano
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To investigate in vivo the acute host response to an alternative implant designed for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods. A biodegradable scaffold was produced from poly-L-lactic acid (PLA) using the electrospinning technique. Human and rat adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) were isolated and characterized by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and differentiation assays. PLA scaffolds were seeded and cultured for 2 weeks with human or rat ADSCs. Scaffolds with and without human or rat ADSCs were implanted subcutaneously on the abdominal wall of rats. After 3 and 7 days, 6 animals from each group were sacrificed. Sections from each sample were analyzed by Haematoxylin and Eosin staining, Sirius red staining, and immunohistochemistry for CD68, PECAM-1, and collagen I and III. Results. Animals responded to the scaffolds with an acute macrophage response. After 7 days of implantation, there was extensive host cell penetration, new blood vessel formation, and new collagen deposition throughout the full thickness of the samples without obvious differences between cell-containing and cell-free scaffolds. Conclusions. The acute in vivo response to an alternative implant (both with and without cells) for the treatment of SUI and POP showed good acute integration into the host tissues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4124768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41247682014-08-18 Acute In Vivo Response to an Alternative Implant for Urogynecology Roman Regueros, Sabiniano Albersen, Maarten Manodoro, Stefano Zia, Silvia Osman, Nadir I. Bullock, Anthony J. Chapple, Christopher R. Deprest, Jan MacNeil, Sheila Biomed Res Int Research Article Purpose. To investigate in vivo the acute host response to an alternative implant designed for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods. A biodegradable scaffold was produced from poly-L-lactic acid (PLA) using the electrospinning technique. Human and rat adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) were isolated and characterized by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and differentiation assays. PLA scaffolds were seeded and cultured for 2 weeks with human or rat ADSCs. Scaffolds with and without human or rat ADSCs were implanted subcutaneously on the abdominal wall of rats. After 3 and 7 days, 6 animals from each group were sacrificed. Sections from each sample were analyzed by Haematoxylin and Eosin staining, Sirius red staining, and immunohistochemistry for CD68, PECAM-1, and collagen I and III. Results. Animals responded to the scaffolds with an acute macrophage response. After 7 days of implantation, there was extensive host cell penetration, new blood vessel formation, and new collagen deposition throughout the full thickness of the samples without obvious differences between cell-containing and cell-free scaffolds. Conclusions. The acute in vivo response to an alternative implant (both with and without cells) for the treatment of SUI and POP showed good acute integration into the host tissues. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4124768/ /pubmed/25136633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/853610 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sabiniano Roman Regueros et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roman Regueros, Sabiniano
Albersen, Maarten
Manodoro, Stefano
Zia, Silvia
Osman, Nadir I.
Bullock, Anthony J.
Chapple, Christopher R.
Deprest, Jan
MacNeil, Sheila
Acute In Vivo Response to an Alternative Implant for Urogynecology
title Acute In Vivo Response to an Alternative Implant for Urogynecology
title_full Acute In Vivo Response to an Alternative Implant for Urogynecology
title_fullStr Acute In Vivo Response to an Alternative Implant for Urogynecology
title_full_unstemmed Acute In Vivo Response to an Alternative Implant for Urogynecology
title_short Acute In Vivo Response to an Alternative Implant for Urogynecology
title_sort acute in vivo response to an alternative implant for urogynecology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4124768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25136633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/853610
work_keys_str_mv AT romanreguerossabiniano acuteinvivoresponsetoanalternativeimplantforurogynecology
AT albersenmaarten acuteinvivoresponsetoanalternativeimplantforurogynecology
AT manodorostefano acuteinvivoresponsetoanalternativeimplantforurogynecology
AT ziasilvia acuteinvivoresponsetoanalternativeimplantforurogynecology
AT osmannadiri acuteinvivoresponsetoanalternativeimplantforurogynecology
AT bullockanthonyj acuteinvivoresponsetoanalternativeimplantforurogynecology
AT chapplechristopherr acuteinvivoresponsetoanalternativeimplantforurogynecology
AT deprestjan acuteinvivoresponsetoanalternativeimplantforurogynecology
AT macneilsheila acuteinvivoresponsetoanalternativeimplantforurogynecology