Cargando…

Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components

Movement primitives or synergies have been extracted from human hand movements using several matrix factorization, dimensionality reduction, and classification methods. Principal component analysis (PCA) is widely used to obtain the first few significant eigenvectors of covariance that explain most...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vinjamuri, Ramana, Patel, Vrajeshri, Powell, Michael, Mao, Zhi-Hong, Crone, Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4124789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/373957
_version_ 1782329675317510144
author Vinjamuri, Ramana
Patel, Vrajeshri
Powell, Michael
Mao, Zhi-Hong
Crone, Nathan
author_facet Vinjamuri, Ramana
Patel, Vrajeshri
Powell, Michael
Mao, Zhi-Hong
Crone, Nathan
author_sort Vinjamuri, Ramana
collection PubMed
description Movement primitives or synergies have been extracted from human hand movements using several matrix factorization, dimensionality reduction, and classification methods. Principal component analysis (PCA) is widely used to obtain the first few significant eigenvectors of covariance that explain most of the variance of the data. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is also used as a supervised learning method to classify the hand postures corresponding to the objects grasped. Synergies obtained using PCA are principal component vectors aligned with dominant variances. On the other hand, synergies obtained using LDA are linear discriminant vectors that separate the groups of variances. In this paper, time varying kinematic synergies in the human hand grasping movements were extracted using these two diametrically opposite methods and were evaluated in reconstructing natural and American sign language (ASL) postural movements. We used an unsupervised LDA (ULDA) to extract linear discriminants. The results suggest that PCA outperformed LDA. The uniqueness, advantages, and disadvantages of each of these methods in representing high-dimensional hand movements in reduced dimensions were discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4124789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41247892014-08-20 Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components Vinjamuri, Ramana Patel, Vrajeshri Powell, Michael Mao, Zhi-Hong Crone, Nathan Comput Intell Neurosci Research Article Movement primitives or synergies have been extracted from human hand movements using several matrix factorization, dimensionality reduction, and classification methods. Principal component analysis (PCA) is widely used to obtain the first few significant eigenvectors of covariance that explain most of the variance of the data. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is also used as a supervised learning method to classify the hand postures corresponding to the objects grasped. Synergies obtained using PCA are principal component vectors aligned with dominant variances. On the other hand, synergies obtained using LDA are linear discriminant vectors that separate the groups of variances. In this paper, time varying kinematic synergies in the human hand grasping movements were extracted using these two diametrically opposite methods and were evaluated in reconstructing natural and American sign language (ASL) postural movements. We used an unsupervised LDA (ULDA) to extract linear discriminants. The results suggest that PCA outperformed LDA. The uniqueness, advantages, and disadvantages of each of these methods in representing high-dimensional hand movements in reduced dimensions were discussed. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4124789/ /pubmed/25143763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/373957 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ramana Vinjamuri et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vinjamuri, Ramana
Patel, Vrajeshri
Powell, Michael
Mao, Zhi-Hong
Crone, Nathan
Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components
title Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components
title_full Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components
title_fullStr Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components
title_full_unstemmed Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components
title_short Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components
title_sort candidates for synergies: linear discriminants versus principal components
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4124789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/373957
work_keys_str_mv AT vinjamuriramana candidatesforsynergieslineardiscriminantsversusprincipalcomponents
AT patelvrajeshri candidatesforsynergieslineardiscriminantsversusprincipalcomponents
AT powellmichael candidatesforsynergieslineardiscriminantsversusprincipalcomponents
AT maozhihong candidatesforsynergieslineardiscriminantsversusprincipalcomponents
AT cronenathan candidatesforsynergieslineardiscriminantsversusprincipalcomponents