Cargando…
Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components
Movement primitives or synergies have been extracted from human hand movements using several matrix factorization, dimensionality reduction, and classification methods. Principal component analysis (PCA) is widely used to obtain the first few significant eigenvectors of covariance that explain most...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4124789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/373957 |
_version_ | 1782329675317510144 |
---|---|
author | Vinjamuri, Ramana Patel, Vrajeshri Powell, Michael Mao, Zhi-Hong Crone, Nathan |
author_facet | Vinjamuri, Ramana Patel, Vrajeshri Powell, Michael Mao, Zhi-Hong Crone, Nathan |
author_sort | Vinjamuri, Ramana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Movement primitives or synergies have been extracted from human hand movements using several matrix factorization, dimensionality reduction, and classification methods. Principal component analysis (PCA) is widely used to obtain the first few significant eigenvectors of covariance that explain most of the variance of the data. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is also used as a supervised learning method to classify the hand postures corresponding to the objects grasped. Synergies obtained using PCA are principal component vectors aligned with dominant variances. On the other hand, synergies obtained using LDA are linear discriminant vectors that separate the groups of variances. In this paper, time varying kinematic synergies in the human hand grasping movements were extracted using these two diametrically opposite methods and were evaluated in reconstructing natural and American sign language (ASL) postural movements. We used an unsupervised LDA (ULDA) to extract linear discriminants. The results suggest that PCA outperformed LDA. The uniqueness, advantages, and disadvantages of each of these methods in representing high-dimensional hand movements in reduced dimensions were discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4124789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41247892014-08-20 Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components Vinjamuri, Ramana Patel, Vrajeshri Powell, Michael Mao, Zhi-Hong Crone, Nathan Comput Intell Neurosci Research Article Movement primitives or synergies have been extracted from human hand movements using several matrix factorization, dimensionality reduction, and classification methods. Principal component analysis (PCA) is widely used to obtain the first few significant eigenvectors of covariance that explain most of the variance of the data. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is also used as a supervised learning method to classify the hand postures corresponding to the objects grasped. Synergies obtained using PCA are principal component vectors aligned with dominant variances. On the other hand, synergies obtained using LDA are linear discriminant vectors that separate the groups of variances. In this paper, time varying kinematic synergies in the human hand grasping movements were extracted using these two diametrically opposite methods and were evaluated in reconstructing natural and American sign language (ASL) postural movements. We used an unsupervised LDA (ULDA) to extract linear discriminants. The results suggest that PCA outperformed LDA. The uniqueness, advantages, and disadvantages of each of these methods in representing high-dimensional hand movements in reduced dimensions were discussed. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4124789/ /pubmed/25143763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/373957 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ramana Vinjamuri et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vinjamuri, Ramana Patel, Vrajeshri Powell, Michael Mao, Zhi-Hong Crone, Nathan Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components |
title | Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components |
title_full | Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components |
title_fullStr | Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components |
title_full_unstemmed | Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components |
title_short | Candidates for Synergies: Linear Discriminants versus Principal Components |
title_sort | candidates for synergies: linear discriminants versus principal components |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4124789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/373957 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vinjamuriramana candidatesforsynergieslineardiscriminantsversusprincipalcomponents AT patelvrajeshri candidatesforsynergieslineardiscriminantsversusprincipalcomponents AT powellmichael candidatesforsynergieslineardiscriminantsversusprincipalcomponents AT maozhihong candidatesforsynergieslineardiscriminantsversusprincipalcomponents AT cronenathan candidatesforsynergieslineardiscriminantsversusprincipalcomponents |