Cargando…
Biomechanical Factors in Planning of Periacetabular Osteotomy
Objective: This study addresses the effects of cartilage thickness distribution and compressive properties in the context of optimal alignment planning for periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Background: The Biomechanical Guidance System (BGS) is a computer-assisted surgical suite assisting surgeon’s in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4126379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25152876 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2013.00020 |
_version_ | 1782329895753351168 |
---|---|
author | Niknafs, Noushin Murphy, Ryan J. Armiger, Robert S. Lepistö, Jyri Armand, Mehran |
author_facet | Niknafs, Noushin Murphy, Ryan J. Armiger, Robert S. Lepistö, Jyri Armand, Mehran |
author_sort | Niknafs, Noushin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: This study addresses the effects of cartilage thickness distribution and compressive properties in the context of optimal alignment planning for periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Background: The Biomechanical Guidance System (BGS) is a computer-assisted surgical suite assisting surgeon’s in determining the most beneficial new alignment of a patient’s acetabulum. The BGS uses biomechanical analysis of the hip to find this optimal alignment. Articular cartilage is an essential component of this analysis and its physical properties can affect contact pressure outcomes. Methods: Patient-specific hip joint models created from CT scans of a cohort of 29 dysplastic subjects were tested with four different cartilage thickness profiles (one uniform and three non-uniform) and two sets of compressive characteristics. For each combination of thickness distribution and compressive properties, the optimal alignment of the acetabulum was found; the resultant geometric and biomechanical characterization of the hip were compared among the optimal alignments. Results: There was an average decrease of 49.2 ± 22.27% in peak contact pressure from the preoperative to the optimal alignment over all patients. We observed an average increase of 19 ± 7.7° in center-edge angle and an average decrease of 19.5 ± 8.4° in acetabular index angle from the preoperative case to the optimized plan. The optimal alignment increased the lateral coverage of the femoral head and decreased the obliqueness of the acetabular roof in all patients. These anatomical observations were independent of the choice for either cartilage thickness profile, or compressive properties. Conclusion: While patient-specific acetabular morphology is essential for surgeons in planning PAO, the predicted optimal alignment of the acetabulum was not significantly sensitive to the choice of cartilage thickness distribution over the acetabulum. However, in all groups the biomechanically predicted optimal alignment resulted in decreased joint contact pressure and improved acetabular coverage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4126379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41263792014-08-22 Biomechanical Factors in Planning of Periacetabular Osteotomy Niknafs, Noushin Murphy, Ryan J. Armiger, Robert S. Lepistö, Jyri Armand, Mehran Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Objective: This study addresses the effects of cartilage thickness distribution and compressive properties in the context of optimal alignment planning for periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Background: The Biomechanical Guidance System (BGS) is a computer-assisted surgical suite assisting surgeon’s in determining the most beneficial new alignment of a patient’s acetabulum. The BGS uses biomechanical analysis of the hip to find this optimal alignment. Articular cartilage is an essential component of this analysis and its physical properties can affect contact pressure outcomes. Methods: Patient-specific hip joint models created from CT scans of a cohort of 29 dysplastic subjects were tested with four different cartilage thickness profiles (one uniform and three non-uniform) and two sets of compressive characteristics. For each combination of thickness distribution and compressive properties, the optimal alignment of the acetabulum was found; the resultant geometric and biomechanical characterization of the hip were compared among the optimal alignments. Results: There was an average decrease of 49.2 ± 22.27% in peak contact pressure from the preoperative to the optimal alignment over all patients. We observed an average increase of 19 ± 7.7° in center-edge angle and an average decrease of 19.5 ± 8.4° in acetabular index angle from the preoperative case to the optimized plan. The optimal alignment increased the lateral coverage of the femoral head and decreased the obliqueness of the acetabular roof in all patients. These anatomical observations were independent of the choice for either cartilage thickness profile, or compressive properties. Conclusion: While patient-specific acetabular morphology is essential for surgeons in planning PAO, the predicted optimal alignment of the acetabulum was not significantly sensitive to the choice of cartilage thickness distribution over the acetabulum. However, in all groups the biomechanically predicted optimal alignment resulted in decreased joint contact pressure and improved acetabular coverage. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4126379/ /pubmed/25152876 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2013.00020 Text en Copyright © 2013 Niknafs, Murphy, Armiger, Lepistö and Armand. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Niknafs, Noushin Murphy, Ryan J. Armiger, Robert S. Lepistö, Jyri Armand, Mehran Biomechanical Factors in Planning of Periacetabular Osteotomy |
title | Biomechanical Factors in Planning of Periacetabular Osteotomy |
title_full | Biomechanical Factors in Planning of Periacetabular Osteotomy |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical Factors in Planning of Periacetabular Osteotomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical Factors in Planning of Periacetabular Osteotomy |
title_short | Biomechanical Factors in Planning of Periacetabular Osteotomy |
title_sort | biomechanical factors in planning of periacetabular osteotomy |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4126379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25152876 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2013.00020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niknafsnoushin biomechanicalfactorsinplanningofperiacetabularosteotomy AT murphyryanj biomechanicalfactorsinplanningofperiacetabularosteotomy AT armigerroberts biomechanicalfactorsinplanningofperiacetabularosteotomy AT lepistojyri biomechanicalfactorsinplanningofperiacetabularosteotomy AT armandmehran biomechanicalfactorsinplanningofperiacetabularosteotomy |