Cargando…
Different yet similar: evolution of imprinting in flowering plants and mammals
Genomic imprinting refers to a form of epigenetic gene regulation whereby alleles are differentially expressed in a parent-of-origin-dependent manner. Imprinting evolved independently in flowering plants and in therian mammals in association with the elaboration of viviparity and a placental habit....
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculty of 1000 Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4126536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25165562 http://dx.doi.org/10.12703/P6-63 |
_version_ | 1782329925896765440 |
---|---|
author | Pires, Nuno D. Grossniklaus, Ueli |
author_facet | Pires, Nuno D. Grossniklaus, Ueli |
author_sort | Pires, Nuno D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genomic imprinting refers to a form of epigenetic gene regulation whereby alleles are differentially expressed in a parent-of-origin-dependent manner. Imprinting evolved independently in flowering plants and in therian mammals in association with the elaboration of viviparity and a placental habit. Despite the striking differences in plant and animal reproduction, genomic imprinting shares multiple characteristics between them. In both groups, imprinted expression is controlled, at least in part, by DNA methylation and chromatin modifications in cis-regulatory regions, and many maternally and paternally expressed genes display complementary dosage-dependent effects during embryogenesis. This suggests that genomic imprinting evolved in response to similar selective pressures in flowering plants and mammals. Nevertheless, there are important differences between plant and animal imprinting. In particular, genomic imprinting has been shown to be more flexible and evolutionarily labile in plants. In mammals, imprinted genes are organized mainly in highly conserved clusters, whereas in plants they occur in isolation throughout the genome and are affected by local gene duplications. There is a large degree of intra- and inter-specific variation in imprinted gene expression in plants. These differences likely reflect the distinct life cycles and the different evolutionary dynamics that shape plant and animal genomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4126536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Faculty of 1000 Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41265362014-08-27 Different yet similar: evolution of imprinting in flowering plants and mammals Pires, Nuno D. Grossniklaus, Ueli F1000Prime Rep Review Article Genomic imprinting refers to a form of epigenetic gene regulation whereby alleles are differentially expressed in a parent-of-origin-dependent manner. Imprinting evolved independently in flowering plants and in therian mammals in association with the elaboration of viviparity and a placental habit. Despite the striking differences in plant and animal reproduction, genomic imprinting shares multiple characteristics between them. In both groups, imprinted expression is controlled, at least in part, by DNA methylation and chromatin modifications in cis-regulatory regions, and many maternally and paternally expressed genes display complementary dosage-dependent effects during embryogenesis. This suggests that genomic imprinting evolved in response to similar selective pressures in flowering plants and mammals. Nevertheless, there are important differences between plant and animal imprinting. In particular, genomic imprinting has been shown to be more flexible and evolutionarily labile in plants. In mammals, imprinted genes are organized mainly in highly conserved clusters, whereas in plants they occur in isolation throughout the genome and are affected by local gene duplications. There is a large degree of intra- and inter-specific variation in imprinted gene expression in plants. These differences likely reflect the distinct life cycles and the different evolutionary dynamics that shape plant and animal genomes. Faculty of 1000 Ltd 2014-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4126536/ /pubmed/25165562 http://dx.doi.org/10.12703/P6-63 Text en © 2014 Faculty of 1000 Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode All F1000Prime Reports articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Pires, Nuno D. Grossniklaus, Ueli Different yet similar: evolution of imprinting in flowering plants and mammals |
title | Different yet similar: evolution of imprinting in flowering plants and mammals |
title_full | Different yet similar: evolution of imprinting in flowering plants and mammals |
title_fullStr | Different yet similar: evolution of imprinting in flowering plants and mammals |
title_full_unstemmed | Different yet similar: evolution of imprinting in flowering plants and mammals |
title_short | Different yet similar: evolution of imprinting in flowering plants and mammals |
title_sort | different yet similar: evolution of imprinting in flowering plants and mammals |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4126536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25165562 http://dx.doi.org/10.12703/P6-63 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT piresnunod differentyetsimilarevolutionofimprintinginfloweringplantsandmammals AT grossniklausueli differentyetsimilarevolutionofimprintinginfloweringplantsandmammals |