Cargando…

Compatibility of Stabilized Whole Blood Products with CD4 Technologies and Their Suitability for Quality Assessment Programs

BACKGROUND: CD4 T cell enumeration is the most widely used prognostic marker for management of HIV disease. Internal quality control and external quality assessment (EQA) programs are critical to ensure reliability of clinical measurements. The utility of stabilized whole blood products (SWBP) as a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Tao, Bergeron, Michèle, Seely, Peggy, Yang, Xuefen, Diallo, Tamsir O., Plews, Margot, Sandstrom, Paul, Ball, T. Blake, Meyers, Adrienne F. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4126665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25105290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103391
_version_ 1782329942736896000
author Ding, Tao
Bergeron, Michèle
Seely, Peggy
Yang, Xuefen
Diallo, Tamsir O.
Plews, Margot
Sandstrom, Paul
Ball, T. Blake
Meyers, Adrienne F. A.
author_facet Ding, Tao
Bergeron, Michèle
Seely, Peggy
Yang, Xuefen
Diallo, Tamsir O.
Plews, Margot
Sandstrom, Paul
Ball, T. Blake
Meyers, Adrienne F. A.
author_sort Ding, Tao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CD4 T cell enumeration is the most widely used prognostic marker for management of HIV disease. Internal quality control and external quality assessment (EQA) programs are critical to ensure reliability of clinical measurements. The utility of stabilized whole blood products (SWBP) as a test reagent for EQA programs such as Quality Assessment and Standardization for Immunological measures relevant to HIV/AIDS (QASI) program have been demonstrated previously. Since then, several new commercial SWBPs and alternative CD4 enumeration technologies have become available. Seven SWBPs were evaluated on seven different enumeration platforms to determine which product(s) are most suitable for EQA programs that support multiple analytical technologies. METHOD: Assessment of SWBPs was based on two criteria: (1) accuracy of CD4 T cell measurements and; (2) stability under sub optimal storage conditions. RESULTS: Three SWBPs (Multi-Check, StatusFlow and CD4 Count) showed accurate CD4 T-cell absolute count and percentage values across six of the enumeration platforms. All products retain stability up to 18 days at 21–23°C with the exception of Multi-Check-high on FacsCount and Multi-Check-Low and StatusFlow-Low on Pima. One of the products (CD4 Count) retained stability for three days on all platforms tested when stored at 37°C. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the characteristics of commercially available SWBPs vary across multiple CD4 platforms. The compatibility of testing panels for EQA programs with multiple analytical platforms needs to be carefully considered, especially in large multiplatform CD4 EQA programs. The selection of a suitable cross-platform SWBP is an increasing challenge as more reagents and platforms are introduced for CD4 T-cell enumeration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4126665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41266652014-08-12 Compatibility of Stabilized Whole Blood Products with CD4 Technologies and Their Suitability for Quality Assessment Programs Ding, Tao Bergeron, Michèle Seely, Peggy Yang, Xuefen Diallo, Tamsir O. Plews, Margot Sandstrom, Paul Ball, T. Blake Meyers, Adrienne F. A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: CD4 T cell enumeration is the most widely used prognostic marker for management of HIV disease. Internal quality control and external quality assessment (EQA) programs are critical to ensure reliability of clinical measurements. The utility of stabilized whole blood products (SWBP) as a test reagent for EQA programs such as Quality Assessment and Standardization for Immunological measures relevant to HIV/AIDS (QASI) program have been demonstrated previously. Since then, several new commercial SWBPs and alternative CD4 enumeration technologies have become available. Seven SWBPs were evaluated on seven different enumeration platforms to determine which product(s) are most suitable for EQA programs that support multiple analytical technologies. METHOD: Assessment of SWBPs was based on two criteria: (1) accuracy of CD4 T cell measurements and; (2) stability under sub optimal storage conditions. RESULTS: Three SWBPs (Multi-Check, StatusFlow and CD4 Count) showed accurate CD4 T-cell absolute count and percentage values across six of the enumeration platforms. All products retain stability up to 18 days at 21–23°C with the exception of Multi-Check-high on FacsCount and Multi-Check-Low and StatusFlow-Low on Pima. One of the products (CD4 Count) retained stability for three days on all platforms tested when stored at 37°C. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the characteristics of commercially available SWBPs vary across multiple CD4 platforms. The compatibility of testing panels for EQA programs with multiple analytical platforms needs to be carefully considered, especially in large multiplatform CD4 EQA programs. The selection of a suitable cross-platform SWBP is an increasing challenge as more reagents and platforms are introduced for CD4 T-cell enumeration. Public Library of Science 2014-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4126665/ /pubmed/25105290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103391 Text en © 2014 Ding et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ding, Tao
Bergeron, Michèle
Seely, Peggy
Yang, Xuefen
Diallo, Tamsir O.
Plews, Margot
Sandstrom, Paul
Ball, T. Blake
Meyers, Adrienne F. A.
Compatibility of Stabilized Whole Blood Products with CD4 Technologies and Their Suitability for Quality Assessment Programs
title Compatibility of Stabilized Whole Blood Products with CD4 Technologies and Their Suitability for Quality Assessment Programs
title_full Compatibility of Stabilized Whole Blood Products with CD4 Technologies and Their Suitability for Quality Assessment Programs
title_fullStr Compatibility of Stabilized Whole Blood Products with CD4 Technologies and Their Suitability for Quality Assessment Programs
title_full_unstemmed Compatibility of Stabilized Whole Blood Products with CD4 Technologies and Their Suitability for Quality Assessment Programs
title_short Compatibility of Stabilized Whole Blood Products with CD4 Technologies and Their Suitability for Quality Assessment Programs
title_sort compatibility of stabilized whole blood products with cd4 technologies and their suitability for quality assessment programs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4126665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25105290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103391
work_keys_str_mv AT dingtao compatibilityofstabilizedwholebloodproductswithcd4technologiesandtheirsuitabilityforqualityassessmentprograms
AT bergeronmichele compatibilityofstabilizedwholebloodproductswithcd4technologiesandtheirsuitabilityforqualityassessmentprograms
AT seelypeggy compatibilityofstabilizedwholebloodproductswithcd4technologiesandtheirsuitabilityforqualityassessmentprograms
AT yangxuefen compatibilityofstabilizedwholebloodproductswithcd4technologiesandtheirsuitabilityforqualityassessmentprograms
AT diallotamsiro compatibilityofstabilizedwholebloodproductswithcd4technologiesandtheirsuitabilityforqualityassessmentprograms
AT plewsmargot compatibilityofstabilizedwholebloodproductswithcd4technologiesandtheirsuitabilityforqualityassessmentprograms
AT sandstrompaul compatibilityofstabilizedwholebloodproductswithcd4technologiesandtheirsuitabilityforqualityassessmentprograms
AT balltblake compatibilityofstabilizedwholebloodproductswithcd4technologiesandtheirsuitabilityforqualityassessmentprograms
AT meyersadriennefa compatibilityofstabilizedwholebloodproductswithcd4technologiesandtheirsuitabilityforqualityassessmentprograms