Cargando…
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in a large British hospital: comparison with published experience
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) are high-cost agents recommended as prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia or as adjunctive treatment of severe neutropenic sepsis. Their use in high-risk situations such as acute myeloid leukaemia, acute lymphocytic leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4127058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25126143 |
_version_ | 1782329987905355776 |
---|---|
author | Pérez Velasco, Román |
author_facet | Pérez Velasco, Román |
author_sort | Pérez Velasco, Román |
collection | PubMed |
description | Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) are high-cost agents recommended as prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia or as adjunctive treatment of severe neutropenic sepsis. Their use in high-risk situations such as acute myeloid leukaemia, acute lymphocytic leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and stem cell transplantation is also indicated. OBJECTIVE: This audit assessed the use of G-CSF within the Oncology and Haematology Service Delivery Unit at Guy’s and St. Thomas’ hospital (London, United Kingdom). METHODS: Patients who received G-CSF in April-May 2008 were identified retrospectively from the pharmacy labelling system, and chemotherapy front sheets, clinic letters and transplantation protocols were reviewed. Patients on lenograstim, in clinical trials or under non-approved chemotherapy protocols were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 104 G-CSF treatments were assessed. The most commonly treated malignancy was breast cancer (41.3%), with docetaxel 100 mg/m (2) (34.6%) being the most frequent chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy intent was curative in 66.3 % of cases. Pegfilgrastim was used in 73.1 % of cases and primary prophylaxis was the most common indication (54.8%). Stem cell transplantation was the first indication to meet the audit criterion (93.3%), followed by primary prophylaxis (89.5%). There was a considerable nonadherence for secondary prophylaxis (6.7%). CONCLUSION: The overall level of compliance with the audit criteria was 72.1%. The results for primary and secondary prophylaxis would have been different if FEC100 (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) and docetaxel 100 mg/m (2) had been considered a single chemotherapy regimen. Also, the lack of access to medical notes may have affected the reliability of the results for ‘therapeutic’ use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4127058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41270582014-08-14 Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in a large British hospital: comparison with published experience Pérez Velasco, Román Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) are high-cost agents recommended as prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia or as adjunctive treatment of severe neutropenic sepsis. Their use in high-risk situations such as acute myeloid leukaemia, acute lymphocytic leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and stem cell transplantation is also indicated. OBJECTIVE: This audit assessed the use of G-CSF within the Oncology and Haematology Service Delivery Unit at Guy’s and St. Thomas’ hospital (London, United Kingdom). METHODS: Patients who received G-CSF in April-May 2008 were identified retrospectively from the pharmacy labelling system, and chemotherapy front sheets, clinic letters and transplantation protocols were reviewed. Patients on lenograstim, in clinical trials or under non-approved chemotherapy protocols were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 104 G-CSF treatments were assessed. The most commonly treated malignancy was breast cancer (41.3%), with docetaxel 100 mg/m (2) (34.6%) being the most frequent chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy intent was curative in 66.3 % of cases. Pegfilgrastim was used in 73.1 % of cases and primary prophylaxis was the most common indication (54.8%). Stem cell transplantation was the first indication to meet the audit criterion (93.3%), followed by primary prophylaxis (89.5%). There was a considerable nonadherence for secondary prophylaxis (6.7%). CONCLUSION: The overall level of compliance with the audit criteria was 72.1%. The results for primary and secondary prophylaxis would have been different if FEC100 (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) and docetaxel 100 mg/m (2) had been considered a single chemotherapy regimen. Also, the lack of access to medical notes may have affected the reliability of the results for ‘therapeutic’ use. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2010 2010-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4127058/ /pubmed/25126143 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Pérez Velasco, Román Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in a large British hospital: comparison with published experience |
title | Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in a large British hospital: comparison with published experience |
title_full | Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in a large British hospital: comparison with published experience |
title_fullStr | Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in a large British hospital: comparison with published experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in a large British hospital: comparison with published experience |
title_short | Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in a large British hospital: comparison with published experience |
title_sort | granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in a large british hospital: comparison with published experience |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4127058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25126143 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perezvelascoroman granulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinalargebritishhospitalcomparisonwithpublishedexperience |