Cargando…

Primary and submovement control of aiming in C6 tetraplegics following posterior deltoid transfer

BACKGROUND: Upper limb motor control in fast, goal-directed aiming is altered in tetraplegics following posterior-deltoid musculotendinous transfer. Specifically, movements have similar end-point accuracy but longer duration and lower peak velocity than those of age-matched, neurotypical controls. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, Mark A, Elliott, Digby, Hayes, Spencer J, Barton, Gabor J, Bennett, Simon J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4127436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25055852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-112
_version_ 1782330022748487680
author Robinson, Mark A
Elliott, Digby
Hayes, Spencer J
Barton, Gabor J
Bennett, Simon J
author_facet Robinson, Mark A
Elliott, Digby
Hayes, Spencer J
Barton, Gabor J
Bennett, Simon J
author_sort Robinson, Mark A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Upper limb motor control in fast, goal-directed aiming is altered in tetraplegics following posterior-deltoid musculotendinous transfer. Specifically, movements have similar end-point accuracy but longer duration and lower peak velocity than those of age-matched, neurotypical controls. Here, we examine in detail the interplay between primary movement and submovement phases in five C6 tetraplegic and five control participants. METHODS: Aiming movements were performed in two directions (20 cm away or toward), with or without vision. Trials that contained a submovement phase (i.e., discontinuity in velocity, acceleration or jerk) were identified. Discrete kinematic variables were then extracted on the primary and submovements phases. RESULTS: The presence of submovements did not differ between the tetraplegic (68%) and control (57%) groups, and almost all submovements resulted from acceleration and jerk discontinuities. Tetraplegics tended to make a smaller amplitude primary movement, which had lower peak velocity and greater spatial variability at peak velocity. This was followed by a larger amplitude and longer duration secondary submovement. Peak velocity of primary movement was not related to submovement incidence. Together, the primary and submovement phases of both groups were equally effective in reducing end-point error. CONCLUSIONS: C6 tetraplegic participants exhibit some subtle differences in measures of motor behaviour compared to control participants, but importantly feedforward and feedback processes work effectively in combination to achieve accurate goal-directed aiming.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4127436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41274362014-08-12 Primary and submovement control of aiming in C6 tetraplegics following posterior deltoid transfer Robinson, Mark A Elliott, Digby Hayes, Spencer J Barton, Gabor J Bennett, Simon J J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Upper limb motor control in fast, goal-directed aiming is altered in tetraplegics following posterior-deltoid musculotendinous transfer. Specifically, movements have similar end-point accuracy but longer duration and lower peak velocity than those of age-matched, neurotypical controls. Here, we examine in detail the interplay between primary movement and submovement phases in five C6 tetraplegic and five control participants. METHODS: Aiming movements were performed in two directions (20 cm away or toward), with or without vision. Trials that contained a submovement phase (i.e., discontinuity in velocity, acceleration or jerk) were identified. Discrete kinematic variables were then extracted on the primary and submovements phases. RESULTS: The presence of submovements did not differ between the tetraplegic (68%) and control (57%) groups, and almost all submovements resulted from acceleration and jerk discontinuities. Tetraplegics tended to make a smaller amplitude primary movement, which had lower peak velocity and greater spatial variability at peak velocity. This was followed by a larger amplitude and longer duration secondary submovement. Peak velocity of primary movement was not related to submovement incidence. Together, the primary and submovement phases of both groups were equally effective in reducing end-point error. CONCLUSIONS: C6 tetraplegic participants exhibit some subtle differences in measures of motor behaviour compared to control participants, but importantly feedforward and feedback processes work effectively in combination to achieve accurate goal-directed aiming. BioMed Central 2014-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4127436/ /pubmed/25055852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-112 Text en Copyright © 2014 Robinson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Robinson, Mark A
Elliott, Digby
Hayes, Spencer J
Barton, Gabor J
Bennett, Simon J
Primary and submovement control of aiming in C6 tetraplegics following posterior deltoid transfer
title Primary and submovement control of aiming in C6 tetraplegics following posterior deltoid transfer
title_full Primary and submovement control of aiming in C6 tetraplegics following posterior deltoid transfer
title_fullStr Primary and submovement control of aiming in C6 tetraplegics following posterior deltoid transfer
title_full_unstemmed Primary and submovement control of aiming in C6 tetraplegics following posterior deltoid transfer
title_short Primary and submovement control of aiming in C6 tetraplegics following posterior deltoid transfer
title_sort primary and submovement control of aiming in c6 tetraplegics following posterior deltoid transfer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4127436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25055852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-112
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonmarka primaryandsubmovementcontrolofaiminginc6tetraplegicsfollowingposteriordeltoidtransfer
AT elliottdigby primaryandsubmovementcontrolofaiminginc6tetraplegicsfollowingposteriordeltoidtransfer
AT hayesspencerj primaryandsubmovementcontrolofaiminginc6tetraplegicsfollowingposteriordeltoidtransfer
AT bartongaborj primaryandsubmovementcontrolofaiminginc6tetraplegicsfollowingposteriordeltoidtransfer
AT bennettsimonj primaryandsubmovementcontrolofaiminginc6tetraplegicsfollowingposteriordeltoidtransfer