Cargando…

Evaluation of smear layer removal from ultrasonically prepared retrocavities by three agents

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of 35% orthophosphoric acid, 24% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 10% citric acid in the removal of smear layer from retrocavities prepared with ultrasonic retro-tips using scanning electron microscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Root canals of fifty single...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srinivasan, Raghu, Ashwathappa, Girish Sooranagenahalli, Junjanna, Pramod, Bhandary, Shreetha, Aswathanarayana, Ranjini Mandagere, Shetty, Ashwija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4127690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25125844
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.136440
_version_ 1782330053818843136
author Srinivasan, Raghu
Ashwathappa, Girish Sooranagenahalli
Junjanna, Pramod
Bhandary, Shreetha
Aswathanarayana, Ranjini Mandagere
Shetty, Ashwija
author_facet Srinivasan, Raghu
Ashwathappa, Girish Sooranagenahalli
Junjanna, Pramod
Bhandary, Shreetha
Aswathanarayana, Ranjini Mandagere
Shetty, Ashwija
author_sort Srinivasan, Raghu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of 35% orthophosphoric acid, 24% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 10% citric acid in the removal of smear layer from retrocavities prepared with ultrasonic retro-tips using scanning electron microscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Root canals of fifty single-rooted teeth were cleaned, shaped, and obturated with gutta-percha and AH plus sealer. The apical 3 mm of each root was sectioned with a diamond disc and retrograde cavities were prepared with Kis # 1 ultrasonic retro-tips to a depth of 3 mm. Retro cavities in Group I were treated with a gel of 35% orthophosphoric acid for 15 seconds, Group II were treated with a gel of 24% EDTA at neutral pH for 2 minutes, and Group III were treated with a gel of 10% citric acid for 2 minutes, followed by 1 minute rinsing with distilled water for all groups. The samples were prepared for scanning electron microscopic observation. Scoring was performed for the presence of the smear layer on the walls of the retrocavity. RESULTS: In the orthophosphoric acid group, it was observed that all dentinal tubules were open in 70% of the samples. The majority of analyzed samples in EDTA and citric acid group showed dentinal tubules covered with the smear layer. CONCLUSIONS: Application of 35% orthophosphoric acid gel for 15 seconds on retrocavities prepared with ultrasonic retro-tips is the most effective means for removal of smear layer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4127690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41276902014-08-14 Evaluation of smear layer removal from ultrasonically prepared retrocavities by three agents Srinivasan, Raghu Ashwathappa, Girish Sooranagenahalli Junjanna, Pramod Bhandary, Shreetha Aswathanarayana, Ranjini Mandagere Shetty, Ashwija J Conserv Dent Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of 35% orthophosphoric acid, 24% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 10% citric acid in the removal of smear layer from retrocavities prepared with ultrasonic retro-tips using scanning electron microscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Root canals of fifty single-rooted teeth were cleaned, shaped, and obturated with gutta-percha and AH plus sealer. The apical 3 mm of each root was sectioned with a diamond disc and retrograde cavities were prepared with Kis # 1 ultrasonic retro-tips to a depth of 3 mm. Retro cavities in Group I were treated with a gel of 35% orthophosphoric acid for 15 seconds, Group II were treated with a gel of 24% EDTA at neutral pH for 2 minutes, and Group III were treated with a gel of 10% citric acid for 2 minutes, followed by 1 minute rinsing with distilled water for all groups. The samples were prepared for scanning electron microscopic observation. Scoring was performed for the presence of the smear layer on the walls of the retrocavity. RESULTS: In the orthophosphoric acid group, it was observed that all dentinal tubules were open in 70% of the samples. The majority of analyzed samples in EDTA and citric acid group showed dentinal tubules covered with the smear layer. CONCLUSIONS: Application of 35% orthophosphoric acid gel for 15 seconds on retrocavities prepared with ultrasonic retro-tips is the most effective means for removal of smear layer. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4127690/ /pubmed/25125844 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.136440 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Srinivasan, Raghu
Ashwathappa, Girish Sooranagenahalli
Junjanna, Pramod
Bhandary, Shreetha
Aswathanarayana, Ranjini Mandagere
Shetty, Ashwija
Evaluation of smear layer removal from ultrasonically prepared retrocavities by three agents
title Evaluation of smear layer removal from ultrasonically prepared retrocavities by three agents
title_full Evaluation of smear layer removal from ultrasonically prepared retrocavities by three agents
title_fullStr Evaluation of smear layer removal from ultrasonically prepared retrocavities by three agents
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of smear layer removal from ultrasonically prepared retrocavities by three agents
title_short Evaluation of smear layer removal from ultrasonically prepared retrocavities by three agents
title_sort evaluation of smear layer removal from ultrasonically prepared retrocavities by three agents
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4127690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25125844
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.136440
work_keys_str_mv AT srinivasanraghu evaluationofsmearlayerremovalfromultrasonicallypreparedretrocavitiesbythreeagents
AT ashwathappagirishsooranagenahalli evaluationofsmearlayerremovalfromultrasonicallypreparedretrocavitiesbythreeagents
AT junjannapramod evaluationofsmearlayerremovalfromultrasonicallypreparedretrocavitiesbythreeagents
AT bhandaryshreetha evaluationofsmearlayerremovalfromultrasonicallypreparedretrocavitiesbythreeagents
AT aswathanarayanaranjinimandagere evaluationofsmearlayerremovalfromultrasonicallypreparedretrocavitiesbythreeagents
AT shettyashwija evaluationofsmearlayerremovalfromultrasonicallypreparedretrocavitiesbythreeagents