Cargando…

Protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China

INTRODUCTION: The SAMMPRIS trial suggested that aggressive treatment was superior to endovascular stenting in patients with severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) due to high complication rates in patients in the stenting group. Given that 12.2% patients failed aggressive me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yilong, Miao, Zhongrong, Wang, Yongjun, Zhao, Xingquan, Gao, Peiyi, Liu, Liping, Wang, Feng, Liu, Yajie, Ma, Ning, Xu, Ziqi, Mo,, Dapeng, Gao, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4127916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25107437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005175
_version_ 1782330082527805440
author Wang, Yilong
Miao, Zhongrong
Wang, Yongjun
Zhao, Xingquan
Gao, Peiyi
Liu, Liping
Wang, Feng
Liu, Yajie
Ma, Ning
Xu, Ziqi
Mo,, Dapeng
Gao, Feng
author_facet Wang, Yilong
Miao, Zhongrong
Wang, Yongjun
Zhao, Xingquan
Gao, Peiyi
Liu, Liping
Wang, Feng
Liu, Yajie
Ma, Ning
Xu, Ziqi
Mo,, Dapeng
Gao, Feng
author_sort Wang, Yilong
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The SAMMPRIS trial suggested that aggressive treatment was superior to endovascular stenting in patients with severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) due to high complication rates in patients in the stenting group. Given that 12.2% patients failed aggressive medical therapy in the SAMMPRIS study, it is imperative to perform a multicentre prospective registry study of stenting for patients with ICAS in China. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular stenting for patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis and poor collaterals in China and to identify the characteristics of the population that would benefit the most from endovascular stenting in Chinese patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre prospective registry study will involve 20 stroke centres in China, and plans to recruit 300 patients into the registry. Patients with ≥70% stenosis and symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease caused by hypoperfusion combined with poor collaterals who met the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria would be enrolled for this study. The primary outcome is the target vessel stroke event (including haemorrhagic or ischaemic stroke) or death within 30 days after stenting. The secondary outcomes include the successful recanalisation rate, the incidence of recurrent ischaemic stroke in the territory of the stented artery between 30 days and 1 year postoperatively, the restenosis rate and health-related quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol is approved by the ethics committee at the coordinating centre and by the local institutional review board at each participating centre. Findings will be shared with participating hospitals, policymakers and the academic community to promote quality monitoring, quality improvement and the efficient allocation and use of cerebral catheterisation and intracranial artery stenting in China. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01968122).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4127916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41279162014-08-12 Protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China Wang, Yilong Miao, Zhongrong Wang, Yongjun Zhao, Xingquan Gao, Peiyi Liu, Liping Wang, Feng Liu, Yajie Ma, Ning Xu, Ziqi Mo,, Dapeng Gao, Feng BMJ Open Neurology INTRODUCTION: The SAMMPRIS trial suggested that aggressive treatment was superior to endovascular stenting in patients with severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) due to high complication rates in patients in the stenting group. Given that 12.2% patients failed aggressive medical therapy in the SAMMPRIS study, it is imperative to perform a multicentre prospective registry study of stenting for patients with ICAS in China. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular stenting for patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis and poor collaterals in China and to identify the characteristics of the population that would benefit the most from endovascular stenting in Chinese patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre prospective registry study will involve 20 stroke centres in China, and plans to recruit 300 patients into the registry. Patients with ≥70% stenosis and symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease caused by hypoperfusion combined with poor collaterals who met the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria would be enrolled for this study. The primary outcome is the target vessel stroke event (including haemorrhagic or ischaemic stroke) or death within 30 days after stenting. The secondary outcomes include the successful recanalisation rate, the incidence of recurrent ischaemic stroke in the territory of the stented artery between 30 days and 1 year postoperatively, the restenosis rate and health-related quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol is approved by the ethics committee at the coordinating centre and by the local institutional review board at each participating centre. Findings will be shared with participating hospitals, policymakers and the academic community to promote quality monitoring, quality improvement and the efficient allocation and use of cerebral catheterisation and intracranial artery stenting in China. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01968122). BMJ Publishing Group 2014-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4127916/ /pubmed/25107437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005175 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Neurology
Wang, Yilong
Miao, Zhongrong
Wang, Yongjun
Zhao, Xingquan
Gao, Peiyi
Liu, Liping
Wang, Feng
Liu, Yajie
Ma, Ning
Xu, Ziqi
Mo,, Dapeng
Gao, Feng
Protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China
title Protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China
title_full Protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China
title_fullStr Protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China
title_short Protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China
title_sort protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in china
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4127916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25107437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005175
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyilong protocolforaprospectivemulticentreregistrystudyofstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterystenosisinchina
AT miaozhongrong protocolforaprospectivemulticentreregistrystudyofstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterystenosisinchina
AT wangyongjun protocolforaprospectivemulticentreregistrystudyofstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterystenosisinchina
AT zhaoxingquan protocolforaprospectivemulticentreregistrystudyofstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterystenosisinchina
AT gaopeiyi protocolforaprospectivemulticentreregistrystudyofstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterystenosisinchina
AT liuliping protocolforaprospectivemulticentreregistrystudyofstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterystenosisinchina
AT wangfeng protocolforaprospectivemulticentreregistrystudyofstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterystenosisinchina
AT liuyajie protocolforaprospectivemulticentreregistrystudyofstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterystenosisinchina
AT maning protocolforaprospectivemulticentreregistrystudyofstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterystenosisinchina
AT xuziqi protocolforaprospectivemulticentreregistrystudyofstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterystenosisinchina
AT modapeng protocolforaprospectivemulticentreregistrystudyofstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterystenosisinchina
AT gaofeng protocolforaprospectivemulticentreregistrystudyofstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterystenosisinchina
AT protocolforaprospectivemulticentreregistrystudyofstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterystenosisinchina