Cargando…

Relationship between gene duplicability and diversifiability in the topology of biochemical networks

BACKGROUND: Selective gene duplicability, the extensive expansion of a small number of gene families, is universal. Quantitatively, the number of genes (P((K))) with K duplicates in a genome decreases precipitously as K increases, and often follows a power law (P((k))∝k(-α)). Functional diversificat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Zhanyong, Jiang, Wen, Lages, Nuno, Borcherds, Wade, Wang, Degeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4129122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25005725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-577
_version_ 1782330197674033152
author Guo, Zhanyong
Jiang, Wen
Lages, Nuno
Borcherds, Wade
Wang, Degeng
author_facet Guo, Zhanyong
Jiang, Wen
Lages, Nuno
Borcherds, Wade
Wang, Degeng
author_sort Guo, Zhanyong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Selective gene duplicability, the extensive expansion of a small number of gene families, is universal. Quantitatively, the number of genes (P((K))) with K duplicates in a genome decreases precipitously as K increases, and often follows a power law (P((k))∝k(-α)). Functional diversification, either neo- or sub-functionalization, is a major evolution route for duplicate genes. RESULTS: Using three lines of genomic datasets, we studied the relationship between gene duplicability and diversifiability in the topology of biochemical networks. First, we explored scenario where two pathways in the biochemical networks antagonize each other. Synthetic knockout of respective genes for the two pathways rescues the phenotypic defects of each individual knockout. We identified duplicate gene pairs with sufficient divergences that represent this antagonism relationship in the yeast S. cerevisiae. Such pairs overwhelmingly belong to large gene families, thus tend to have high duplicability. Second, we used distances between proteins of duplicate genes in the protein interaction network as a metric of their diversification. The higher a gene’s duplicate count, the further the proteins of this gene and its duplicates drift away from one another in the networks, which is especially true for genetically antagonizing duplicate genes. Third, we computed a sequence-homology-based clustering coefficient to quantify sequence diversifiability among duplicate genes – the lower the coefficient, the more the sequences have diverged. Duplicate count (K) of a gene is negatively correlated to the clustering coefficient of its duplicates, suggesting that gene duplicability is related to the extent of sequence divergence within the duplicate gene family. CONCLUSION: Thus, a positive correlation exists between gene diversifiability and duplicability in the context of biochemical networks – an improvement of our understanding of gene duplicability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4129122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41291222014-08-18 Relationship between gene duplicability and diversifiability in the topology of biochemical networks Guo, Zhanyong Jiang, Wen Lages, Nuno Borcherds, Wade Wang, Degeng BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Selective gene duplicability, the extensive expansion of a small number of gene families, is universal. Quantitatively, the number of genes (P((K))) with K duplicates in a genome decreases precipitously as K increases, and often follows a power law (P((k))∝k(-α)). Functional diversification, either neo- or sub-functionalization, is a major evolution route for duplicate genes. RESULTS: Using three lines of genomic datasets, we studied the relationship between gene duplicability and diversifiability in the topology of biochemical networks. First, we explored scenario where two pathways in the biochemical networks antagonize each other. Synthetic knockout of respective genes for the two pathways rescues the phenotypic defects of each individual knockout. We identified duplicate gene pairs with sufficient divergences that represent this antagonism relationship in the yeast S. cerevisiae. Such pairs overwhelmingly belong to large gene families, thus tend to have high duplicability. Second, we used distances between proteins of duplicate genes in the protein interaction network as a metric of their diversification. The higher a gene’s duplicate count, the further the proteins of this gene and its duplicates drift away from one another in the networks, which is especially true for genetically antagonizing duplicate genes. Third, we computed a sequence-homology-based clustering coefficient to quantify sequence diversifiability among duplicate genes – the lower the coefficient, the more the sequences have diverged. Duplicate count (K) of a gene is negatively correlated to the clustering coefficient of its duplicates, suggesting that gene duplicability is related to the extent of sequence divergence within the duplicate gene family. CONCLUSION: Thus, a positive correlation exists between gene diversifiability and duplicability in the context of biochemical networks – an improvement of our understanding of gene duplicability. BioMed Central 2014-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4129122/ /pubmed/25005725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-577 Text en © Guo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guo, Zhanyong
Jiang, Wen
Lages, Nuno
Borcherds, Wade
Wang, Degeng
Relationship between gene duplicability and diversifiability in the topology of biochemical networks
title Relationship between gene duplicability and diversifiability in the topology of biochemical networks
title_full Relationship between gene duplicability and diversifiability in the topology of biochemical networks
title_fullStr Relationship between gene duplicability and diversifiability in the topology of biochemical networks
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between gene duplicability and diversifiability in the topology of biochemical networks
title_short Relationship between gene duplicability and diversifiability in the topology of biochemical networks
title_sort relationship between gene duplicability and diversifiability in the topology of biochemical networks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4129122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25005725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-577
work_keys_str_mv AT guozhanyong relationshipbetweengeneduplicabilityanddiversifiabilityinthetopologyofbiochemicalnetworks
AT jiangwen relationshipbetweengeneduplicabilityanddiversifiabilityinthetopologyofbiochemicalnetworks
AT lagesnuno relationshipbetweengeneduplicabilityanddiversifiabilityinthetopologyofbiochemicalnetworks
AT borcherdswade relationshipbetweengeneduplicabilityanddiversifiabilityinthetopologyofbiochemicalnetworks
AT wangdegeng relationshipbetweengeneduplicabilityanddiversifiabilityinthetopologyofbiochemicalnetworks