Cargando…

The Impact of Different Surgical Modalities for Hysterectomy on Satisfaction and Patient Reported Outcomes

BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate regarding the cost-benefit of different surgical modalities for hysterectomy. Studies have relied primarily on evaluation of clinical outcomes and medical expenses. Thus, a paucity of information on patient-reported outcomes including satisfaction, recovery, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pitter, Michael C, Simmonds, Christopher, Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha, Hubert, Helen B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4129130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25048103
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.3160
_version_ 1782330199570907136
author Pitter, Michael C
Simmonds, Christopher
Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha
Hubert, Helen B
author_facet Pitter, Michael C
Simmonds, Christopher
Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha
Hubert, Helen B
author_sort Pitter, Michael C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate regarding the cost-benefit of different surgical modalities for hysterectomy. Studies have relied primarily on evaluation of clinical outcomes and medical expenses. Thus, a paucity of information on patient-reported outcomes including satisfaction, recovery, and recommendations exists. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify differences in patient satisfaction and recommendations by approach to a hysterectomy. METHODS: We recruited a large, geographically diverse group of women who were members of an online hysterectomy support community. US women who had undergone a benign hysterectomy formed this retrospective study cohort. Self-reported characteristics and experiences were compared by surgical modality using chi-square tests. Outcomes over time were assessed with the Jonkheere-Terpstra trend test. Logistic regression identified independent predictors of patient satisfaction and recommendations. RESULTS: There were 6262 women who met the study criteria; 41.74% (2614/6262) underwent an abdominal hysterectomy, 10.64% (666/6262) were vaginal, 27.42% (1717/6262) laparoscopic, 18.94% (1186/6262) robotic, and 1.26% (79/6262) single-incision laparoscopic. Most women were at least college educated (56.37%, 3530/6262), and identified as white, non-Hispanic (83.17%, 5208/6262). Abdominal hysterectomy rates decreased from 68.2% (152/223) to 24.4% (75/307), and minimally invasive surgeries increased from 31.8% (71/223) to 75.6% (232/307) between 2001 or prior years and 2013 (P<.001 all trends). Trends in overall patient satisfaction and recommendations showed significant improvement over time (P<.001).There were differences across the surgical modalities in all patient-reported experiences (ie, satisfaction, time to walking, driving and working, and whether patients would recommend or use the same technique again; P<.001). Significantly better outcomes were evident among women who had vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic procedures than among those who had an abdominal procedure. However, robotic surgery was the only approach that was an independent predictor of better patient experience; these patients were more satisfied overall (odds ratio [OR] 1.31, 95% CI 1.13-1.51) and on six other satisfaction measures, and more likely to recommend (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.39-1.94) and choose the same modality again (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.67-2.57). Abdominal hysterectomy patients were more dissatisfied with outcomes after surgery and less likely to recommend (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.31-0.40) or choose the same technique again (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.25-0.33). Quicker return to normal activities and surgery after 2007 also were independently associated with better overall satisfaction, willingness to recommend, and to choose the same surgery again. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with other US data, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy rates increased over time, with a concomitant decline in abdominal hysterectomy. While inherent shortcomings of this retrospective Web-based study exist, findings show that patient experience was better for each of the major minimally invasive approaches than for abdominal hysterectomy. However, robotic-assisted hysterectomy was the only modality that independently predicted greater satisfaction and willingness to recommend and have the same procedure again.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4129130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41291302014-08-12 The Impact of Different Surgical Modalities for Hysterectomy on Satisfaction and Patient Reported Outcomes Pitter, Michael C Simmonds, Christopher Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha Hubert, Helen B Interact J Med Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate regarding the cost-benefit of different surgical modalities for hysterectomy. Studies have relied primarily on evaluation of clinical outcomes and medical expenses. Thus, a paucity of information on patient-reported outcomes including satisfaction, recovery, and recommendations exists. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify differences in patient satisfaction and recommendations by approach to a hysterectomy. METHODS: We recruited a large, geographically diverse group of women who were members of an online hysterectomy support community. US women who had undergone a benign hysterectomy formed this retrospective study cohort. Self-reported characteristics and experiences were compared by surgical modality using chi-square tests. Outcomes over time were assessed with the Jonkheere-Terpstra trend test. Logistic regression identified independent predictors of patient satisfaction and recommendations. RESULTS: There were 6262 women who met the study criteria; 41.74% (2614/6262) underwent an abdominal hysterectomy, 10.64% (666/6262) were vaginal, 27.42% (1717/6262) laparoscopic, 18.94% (1186/6262) robotic, and 1.26% (79/6262) single-incision laparoscopic. Most women were at least college educated (56.37%, 3530/6262), and identified as white, non-Hispanic (83.17%, 5208/6262). Abdominal hysterectomy rates decreased from 68.2% (152/223) to 24.4% (75/307), and minimally invasive surgeries increased from 31.8% (71/223) to 75.6% (232/307) between 2001 or prior years and 2013 (P<.001 all trends). Trends in overall patient satisfaction and recommendations showed significant improvement over time (P<.001).There were differences across the surgical modalities in all patient-reported experiences (ie, satisfaction, time to walking, driving and working, and whether patients would recommend or use the same technique again; P<.001). Significantly better outcomes were evident among women who had vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic procedures than among those who had an abdominal procedure. However, robotic surgery was the only approach that was an independent predictor of better patient experience; these patients were more satisfied overall (odds ratio [OR] 1.31, 95% CI 1.13-1.51) and on six other satisfaction measures, and more likely to recommend (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.39-1.94) and choose the same modality again (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.67-2.57). Abdominal hysterectomy patients were more dissatisfied with outcomes after surgery and less likely to recommend (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.31-0.40) or choose the same technique again (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.25-0.33). Quicker return to normal activities and surgery after 2007 also were independently associated with better overall satisfaction, willingness to recommend, and to choose the same surgery again. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with other US data, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy rates increased over time, with a concomitant decline in abdominal hysterectomy. While inherent shortcomings of this retrospective Web-based study exist, findings show that patient experience was better for each of the major minimally invasive approaches than for abdominal hysterectomy. However, robotic-assisted hysterectomy was the only modality that independently predicted greater satisfaction and willingness to recommend and have the same procedure again. JMIR Publications Inc. 2014-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4129130/ /pubmed/25048103 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.3160 Text en ©Michael C Pitter, Christopher Simmonds, Usha Seshadri-Kreaden, Helen B Hubert. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (http://www.i-jmr.org/), 17.07.2014. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.i-jmr.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Pitter, Michael C
Simmonds, Christopher
Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha
Hubert, Helen B
The Impact of Different Surgical Modalities for Hysterectomy on Satisfaction and Patient Reported Outcomes
title The Impact of Different Surgical Modalities for Hysterectomy on Satisfaction and Patient Reported Outcomes
title_full The Impact of Different Surgical Modalities for Hysterectomy on Satisfaction and Patient Reported Outcomes
title_fullStr The Impact of Different Surgical Modalities for Hysterectomy on Satisfaction and Patient Reported Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Different Surgical Modalities for Hysterectomy on Satisfaction and Patient Reported Outcomes
title_short The Impact of Different Surgical Modalities for Hysterectomy on Satisfaction and Patient Reported Outcomes
title_sort impact of different surgical modalities for hysterectomy on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4129130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25048103
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.3160
work_keys_str_mv AT pittermichaelc theimpactofdifferentsurgicalmodalitiesforhysterectomyonsatisfactionandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT simmondschristopher theimpactofdifferentsurgicalmodalitiesforhysterectomyonsatisfactionandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT seshadrikreadenusha theimpactofdifferentsurgicalmodalitiesforhysterectomyonsatisfactionandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT huberthelenb theimpactofdifferentsurgicalmodalitiesforhysterectomyonsatisfactionandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT pittermichaelc impactofdifferentsurgicalmodalitiesforhysterectomyonsatisfactionandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT simmondschristopher impactofdifferentsurgicalmodalitiesforhysterectomyonsatisfactionandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT seshadrikreadenusha impactofdifferentsurgicalmodalitiesforhysterectomyonsatisfactionandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT huberthelenb impactofdifferentsurgicalmodalitiesforhysterectomyonsatisfactionandpatientreportedoutcomes