Cargando…
Role of Editorial and Peer Review Processes in Publication Bias: Analysis of Drug Trials Submitted to Eight Medical Journals
BACKGROUND: Publication bias is generally ascribed to authors and sponsors failing to submit studies with negative results, but may also occur after submission. We evaluated whether submitted manuscripts on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with drugs are more likely to be accepted if they report...
Autores principales: | van Lent, Marlies, Overbeke, John, Out, Henk Jan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4130599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25118182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104846 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study
por: van Lent, Marlies, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Recommendations for a uniform assessment of publication bias related to funding source
por: van Lent, Marlies, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Shortcomings of protocols of drug trials in relation to sponsorship as identified by Research Ethics Committees: analysis of comments raised during ethical review
por: van Lent, Marlies, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Reporting Bias in Drug Trials Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of Publication and Presentation
por: Rising, Kristin, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Peer Review Process in Medical Journals
por: Cho, Young Gyu, et al.
Publicado: (2013)