Cargando…

Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND: This observational study aimed to describe the rates and indicators for practice of episiotomy during normal labour and to compare them between women who have had one pregnancy (PG) and women who have already delivered two or more children (G2 and above). METHODS: The study was conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Saadia, Zaheera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4130686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25126014
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/msm.2014.26.188-190
_version_ 1782330367524470784
author Saadia, Zaheera
author_facet Saadia, Zaheera
author_sort Saadia, Zaheera
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This observational study aimed to describe the rates and indicators for practice of episiotomy during normal labour and to compare them between women who have had one pregnancy (PG) and women who have already delivered two or more children (G2 and above). METHODS: The study was conducted at Mother and Child Hospital, Buraidah from October- December 2013 as a descriptive cross sectional study. RESULTS: Overall rate of Episiotomy was 51.20%. Amongst the Primigravidas all went through episiotomies however in G2 and above only 7 patients (4.69%) delivered with episiotomy. Proportions tests revealed that there were significant differences between gravidity groups on two indications of episiotomy (vaginal breech p <0.001 and previous history of perineal tear p < 0.001). G2 and above had episiotomy for breech delivery (1 of 7 = 14.29%) significantly more often than PG participants (0 of 142 = 0.0%). And G2 and above participants experienced episiotomy for previous perineal tear (2 of 7 = 28.5% as compared to none in PG No other significant differences were found on indications of episiotomy. CONCLUSION: Episiotomy is a very common obstetric intervention (51.20%). The PG experience episiotomy significantly more often than G2 and above women. Efforts should be made to reduce its rates. This can be done by reviewing the indications and rates at repeated intervals and setting guidelines for these indications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4130686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41306862014-08-14 Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia Saadia, Zaheera Mater Sociomed Original Paper BACKGROUND: This observational study aimed to describe the rates and indicators for practice of episiotomy during normal labour and to compare them between women who have had one pregnancy (PG) and women who have already delivered two or more children (G2 and above). METHODS: The study was conducted at Mother and Child Hospital, Buraidah from October- December 2013 as a descriptive cross sectional study. RESULTS: Overall rate of Episiotomy was 51.20%. Amongst the Primigravidas all went through episiotomies however in G2 and above only 7 patients (4.69%) delivered with episiotomy. Proportions tests revealed that there were significant differences between gravidity groups on two indications of episiotomy (vaginal breech p <0.001 and previous history of perineal tear p < 0.001). G2 and above had episiotomy for breech delivery (1 of 7 = 14.29%) significantly more often than PG participants (0 of 142 = 0.0%). And G2 and above participants experienced episiotomy for previous perineal tear (2 of 7 = 28.5% as compared to none in PG No other significant differences were found on indications of episiotomy. CONCLUSION: Episiotomy is a very common obstetric intervention (51.20%). The PG experience episiotomy significantly more often than G2 and above women. Efforts should be made to reduce its rates. This can be done by reviewing the indications and rates at repeated intervals and setting guidelines for these indications. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2014-06-21 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4130686/ /pubmed/25126014 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/msm.2014.26.188-190 Text en Copyright: © AVICENA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Saadia, Zaheera
Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia
title Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia
title_full Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia
title_short Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia
title_sort rates and indicators for episiotomy in modern obstetrics – a study from saudi arabia
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4130686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25126014
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/msm.2014.26.188-190
work_keys_str_mv AT saadiazaheera ratesandindicatorsforepisiotomyinmodernobstetricsastudyfromsaudiarabia