Cargando…
Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia
BACKGROUND: This observational study aimed to describe the rates and indicators for practice of episiotomy during normal labour and to compare them between women who have had one pregnancy (PG) and women who have already delivered two or more children (G2 and above). METHODS: The study was conducted...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4130686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25126014 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/msm.2014.26.188-190 |
_version_ | 1782330367524470784 |
---|---|
author | Saadia, Zaheera |
author_facet | Saadia, Zaheera |
author_sort | Saadia, Zaheera |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This observational study aimed to describe the rates and indicators for practice of episiotomy during normal labour and to compare them between women who have had one pregnancy (PG) and women who have already delivered two or more children (G2 and above). METHODS: The study was conducted at Mother and Child Hospital, Buraidah from October- December 2013 as a descriptive cross sectional study. RESULTS: Overall rate of Episiotomy was 51.20%. Amongst the Primigravidas all went through episiotomies however in G2 and above only 7 patients (4.69%) delivered with episiotomy. Proportions tests revealed that there were significant differences between gravidity groups on two indications of episiotomy (vaginal breech p <0.001 and previous history of perineal tear p < 0.001). G2 and above had episiotomy for breech delivery (1 of 7 = 14.29%) significantly more often than PG participants (0 of 142 = 0.0%). And G2 and above participants experienced episiotomy for previous perineal tear (2 of 7 = 28.5% as compared to none in PG No other significant differences were found on indications of episiotomy. CONCLUSION: Episiotomy is a very common obstetric intervention (51.20%). The PG experience episiotomy significantly more often than G2 and above women. Efforts should be made to reduce its rates. This can be done by reviewing the indications and rates at repeated intervals and setting guidelines for these indications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4130686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41306862014-08-14 Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia Saadia, Zaheera Mater Sociomed Original Paper BACKGROUND: This observational study aimed to describe the rates and indicators for practice of episiotomy during normal labour and to compare them between women who have had one pregnancy (PG) and women who have already delivered two or more children (G2 and above). METHODS: The study was conducted at Mother and Child Hospital, Buraidah from October- December 2013 as a descriptive cross sectional study. RESULTS: Overall rate of Episiotomy was 51.20%. Amongst the Primigravidas all went through episiotomies however in G2 and above only 7 patients (4.69%) delivered with episiotomy. Proportions tests revealed that there were significant differences between gravidity groups on two indications of episiotomy (vaginal breech p <0.001 and previous history of perineal tear p < 0.001). G2 and above had episiotomy for breech delivery (1 of 7 = 14.29%) significantly more often than PG participants (0 of 142 = 0.0%). And G2 and above participants experienced episiotomy for previous perineal tear (2 of 7 = 28.5% as compared to none in PG No other significant differences were found on indications of episiotomy. CONCLUSION: Episiotomy is a very common obstetric intervention (51.20%). The PG experience episiotomy significantly more often than G2 and above women. Efforts should be made to reduce its rates. This can be done by reviewing the indications and rates at repeated intervals and setting guidelines for these indications. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2014-06-21 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4130686/ /pubmed/25126014 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/msm.2014.26.188-190 Text en Copyright: © AVICENA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Saadia, Zaheera Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia |
title | Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia |
title_full | Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia |
title_fullStr | Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia |
title_full_unstemmed | Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia |
title_short | Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics – a study from Saudi Arabia |
title_sort | rates and indicators for episiotomy in modern obstetrics – a study from saudi arabia |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4130686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25126014 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/msm.2014.26.188-190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saadiazaheera ratesandindicatorsforepisiotomyinmodernobstetricsastudyfromsaudiarabia |