Cargando…

Plastic and Biodegradable Stents for Complex and Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures

Endoscopic stent placement is a well-accepted and effective alternative treatment modality for complex and refractory esophageal strictures. Among the currently available types of stents, the partially covered self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) has a firm anchoring effect, preventing stent migration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ham, Young Hee, Kim, Gwang Ha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4130882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25133114
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2014.47.4.295
_version_ 1782330378949754880
author Ham, Young Hee
Kim, Gwang Ha
author_facet Ham, Young Hee
Kim, Gwang Ha
author_sort Ham, Young Hee
collection PubMed
description Endoscopic stent placement is a well-accepted and effective alternative treatment modality for complex and refractory esophageal strictures. Among the currently available types of stents, the partially covered self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) has a firm anchoring effect, preventing stent migration and ensuring effective covering of a narrowed segment. However, hyperplastic tissue reaction driven by the uncovered mesh may prevent easy and safe stent removal. As an alternative, a fully covered SEMS decreases the recurrence of dysphagia caused by hyperplastic tissue ingrowth; however, it has a high migration rate. Likewise, although a self-expanding plastic stent (SEPS) reduces reactive hyperplasia, the long-term outcome is disappointing because of the high rate of stent migration. A biodegradable stent has the main benefit of not requiring stent removal in comparison with SEMS and SEPS. However, it still has a somewhat high rate of hyperplastic reaction, and the long-term outcome does not satisfy expectations. Up to now, the question of which type of stent should be recommended for the effective treatment of complex and refractory benign strictures has no clear answer. Therefore, the selection of stent type for endoscopic treatment should be individualized, taking into consideration the endoscopist's experience as well as patient and stricture characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4130882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41308822014-08-17 Plastic and Biodegradable Stents for Complex and Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures Ham, Young Hee Kim, Gwang Ha Clin Endosc Review Endoscopic stent placement is a well-accepted and effective alternative treatment modality for complex and refractory esophageal strictures. Among the currently available types of stents, the partially covered self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) has a firm anchoring effect, preventing stent migration and ensuring effective covering of a narrowed segment. However, hyperplastic tissue reaction driven by the uncovered mesh may prevent easy and safe stent removal. As an alternative, a fully covered SEMS decreases the recurrence of dysphagia caused by hyperplastic tissue ingrowth; however, it has a high migration rate. Likewise, although a self-expanding plastic stent (SEPS) reduces reactive hyperplasia, the long-term outcome is disappointing because of the high rate of stent migration. A biodegradable stent has the main benefit of not requiring stent removal in comparison with SEMS and SEPS. However, it still has a somewhat high rate of hyperplastic reaction, and the long-term outcome does not satisfy expectations. Up to now, the question of which type of stent should be recommended for the effective treatment of complex and refractory benign strictures has no clear answer. Therefore, the selection of stent type for endoscopic treatment should be individualized, taking into consideration the endoscopist's experience as well as patient and stricture characteristics. The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2014-07 2014-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4130882/ /pubmed/25133114 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2014.47.4.295 Text en Copyright © 2014 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Ham, Young Hee
Kim, Gwang Ha
Plastic and Biodegradable Stents for Complex and Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures
title Plastic and Biodegradable Stents for Complex and Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures
title_full Plastic and Biodegradable Stents for Complex and Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures
title_fullStr Plastic and Biodegradable Stents for Complex and Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures
title_full_unstemmed Plastic and Biodegradable Stents for Complex and Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures
title_short Plastic and Biodegradable Stents for Complex and Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures
title_sort plastic and biodegradable stents for complex and refractory benign esophageal strictures
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4130882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25133114
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2014.47.4.295
work_keys_str_mv AT hamyounghee plasticandbiodegradablestentsforcomplexandrefractorybenignesophagealstrictures
AT kimgwangha plasticandbiodegradablestentsforcomplexandrefractorybenignesophagealstrictures