Cargando…

Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus

Dopaminergic neurons provide value signals in mammals and insects [1–3]. During Drosophila olfactory learning, distinct subsets of dopaminergic neurons appear to assign either positive or negative value to odor representations in mushroom body neurons [4–9]. However, it is not known how flies evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das, Gaurav, Klappenbach, Martín, Vrontou, Eleftheria, Perisse, Emmanuel, Clark, Christopher M., Burke, Christopher J., Waddell, Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cell Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25042590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.078
_version_ 1782330411808980992
author Das, Gaurav
Klappenbach, Martín
Vrontou, Eleftheria
Perisse, Emmanuel
Clark, Christopher M.
Burke, Christopher J.
Waddell, Scott
author_facet Das, Gaurav
Klappenbach, Martín
Vrontou, Eleftheria
Perisse, Emmanuel
Clark, Christopher M.
Burke, Christopher J.
Waddell, Scott
author_sort Das, Gaurav
collection PubMed
description Dopaminergic neurons provide value signals in mammals and insects [1–3]. During Drosophila olfactory learning, distinct subsets of dopaminergic neurons appear to assign either positive or negative value to odor representations in mushroom body neurons [4–9]. However, it is not known how flies evaluate substances that have mixed valence. Here we show that flies form short-lived aversive olfactory memories when trained with odors and sugars that are contaminated with the common insect repellent DEET. This DEET-aversive learning required the MB-MP1 dopaminergic neurons that are also required for shock learning [7]. Moreover, differential conditioning with DEET versus shock suggests that formation of these distinct aversive olfactory memories relies on a common negatively reinforcing dopaminergic mechanism. Surprisingly, as time passed after training, the behavior of DEET-sugar-trained flies reversed from conditioned odor avoidance into odor approach. In addition, flies that were compromised for reward learning exhibited a more robust and longer-lived aversive-DEET memory. These data demonstrate that flies independently process the DEET and sugar components to form parallel aversive and appetitive olfactory memories, with distinct kinetics, that compete to guide learned behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4131107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Cell Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41311072014-08-15 Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus Das, Gaurav Klappenbach, Martín Vrontou, Eleftheria Perisse, Emmanuel Clark, Christopher M. Burke, Christopher J. Waddell, Scott Curr Biol Report Dopaminergic neurons provide value signals in mammals and insects [1–3]. During Drosophila olfactory learning, distinct subsets of dopaminergic neurons appear to assign either positive or negative value to odor representations in mushroom body neurons [4–9]. However, it is not known how flies evaluate substances that have mixed valence. Here we show that flies form short-lived aversive olfactory memories when trained with odors and sugars that are contaminated with the common insect repellent DEET. This DEET-aversive learning required the MB-MP1 dopaminergic neurons that are also required for shock learning [7]. Moreover, differential conditioning with DEET versus shock suggests that formation of these distinct aversive olfactory memories relies on a common negatively reinforcing dopaminergic mechanism. Surprisingly, as time passed after training, the behavior of DEET-sugar-trained flies reversed from conditioned odor avoidance into odor approach. In addition, flies that were compromised for reward learning exhibited a more robust and longer-lived aversive-DEET memory. These data demonstrate that flies independently process the DEET and sugar components to form parallel aversive and appetitive olfactory memories, with distinct kinetics, that compete to guide learned behavior. Cell Press 2014-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4131107/ /pubmed/25042590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.078 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Report
Das, Gaurav
Klappenbach, Martín
Vrontou, Eleftheria
Perisse, Emmanuel
Clark, Christopher M.
Burke, Christopher J.
Waddell, Scott
Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus
title Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus
title_full Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus
title_fullStr Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus
title_full_unstemmed Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus
title_short Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus
title_sort drosophila learn opposing components of a compound food stimulus
topic Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25042590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.078
work_keys_str_mv AT dasgaurav drosophilalearnopposingcomponentsofacompoundfoodstimulus
AT klappenbachmartin drosophilalearnopposingcomponentsofacompoundfoodstimulus
AT vrontoueleftheria drosophilalearnopposingcomponentsofacompoundfoodstimulus
AT perisseemmanuel drosophilalearnopposingcomponentsofacompoundfoodstimulus
AT clarkchristopherm drosophilalearnopposingcomponentsofacompoundfoodstimulus
AT burkechristopherj drosophilalearnopposingcomponentsofacompoundfoodstimulus
AT waddellscott drosophilalearnopposingcomponentsofacompoundfoodstimulus