Cargando…
Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus
Dopaminergic neurons provide value signals in mammals and insects [1–3]. During Drosophila olfactory learning, distinct subsets of dopaminergic neurons appear to assign either positive or negative value to odor representations in mushroom body neurons [4–9]. However, it is not known how flies evalua...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cell Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25042590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.078 |
_version_ | 1782330411808980992 |
---|---|
author | Das, Gaurav Klappenbach, Martín Vrontou, Eleftheria Perisse, Emmanuel Clark, Christopher M. Burke, Christopher J. Waddell, Scott |
author_facet | Das, Gaurav Klappenbach, Martín Vrontou, Eleftheria Perisse, Emmanuel Clark, Christopher M. Burke, Christopher J. Waddell, Scott |
author_sort | Das, Gaurav |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dopaminergic neurons provide value signals in mammals and insects [1–3]. During Drosophila olfactory learning, distinct subsets of dopaminergic neurons appear to assign either positive or negative value to odor representations in mushroom body neurons [4–9]. However, it is not known how flies evaluate substances that have mixed valence. Here we show that flies form short-lived aversive olfactory memories when trained with odors and sugars that are contaminated with the common insect repellent DEET. This DEET-aversive learning required the MB-MP1 dopaminergic neurons that are also required for shock learning [7]. Moreover, differential conditioning with DEET versus shock suggests that formation of these distinct aversive olfactory memories relies on a common negatively reinforcing dopaminergic mechanism. Surprisingly, as time passed after training, the behavior of DEET-sugar-trained flies reversed from conditioned odor avoidance into odor approach. In addition, flies that were compromised for reward learning exhibited a more robust and longer-lived aversive-DEET memory. These data demonstrate that flies independently process the DEET and sugar components to form parallel aversive and appetitive olfactory memories, with distinct kinetics, that compete to guide learned behavior. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4131107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Cell Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41311072014-08-15 Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus Das, Gaurav Klappenbach, Martín Vrontou, Eleftheria Perisse, Emmanuel Clark, Christopher M. Burke, Christopher J. Waddell, Scott Curr Biol Report Dopaminergic neurons provide value signals in mammals and insects [1–3]. During Drosophila olfactory learning, distinct subsets of dopaminergic neurons appear to assign either positive or negative value to odor representations in mushroom body neurons [4–9]. However, it is not known how flies evaluate substances that have mixed valence. Here we show that flies form short-lived aversive olfactory memories when trained with odors and sugars that are contaminated with the common insect repellent DEET. This DEET-aversive learning required the MB-MP1 dopaminergic neurons that are also required for shock learning [7]. Moreover, differential conditioning with DEET versus shock suggests that formation of these distinct aversive olfactory memories relies on a common negatively reinforcing dopaminergic mechanism. Surprisingly, as time passed after training, the behavior of DEET-sugar-trained flies reversed from conditioned odor avoidance into odor approach. In addition, flies that were compromised for reward learning exhibited a more robust and longer-lived aversive-DEET memory. These data demonstrate that flies independently process the DEET and sugar components to form parallel aversive and appetitive olfactory memories, with distinct kinetics, that compete to guide learned behavior. Cell Press 2014-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4131107/ /pubmed/25042590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.078 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Report Das, Gaurav Klappenbach, Martín Vrontou, Eleftheria Perisse, Emmanuel Clark, Christopher M. Burke, Christopher J. Waddell, Scott Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus |
title | Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus |
title_full | Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus |
title_fullStr | Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus |
title_full_unstemmed | Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus |
title_short | Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus |
title_sort | drosophila learn opposing components of a compound food stimulus |
topic | Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25042590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasgaurav drosophilalearnopposingcomponentsofacompoundfoodstimulus AT klappenbachmartin drosophilalearnopposingcomponentsofacompoundfoodstimulus AT vrontoueleftheria drosophilalearnopposingcomponentsofacompoundfoodstimulus AT perisseemmanuel drosophilalearnopposingcomponentsofacompoundfoodstimulus AT clarkchristopherm drosophilalearnopposingcomponentsofacompoundfoodstimulus AT burkechristopherj drosophilalearnopposingcomponentsofacompoundfoodstimulus AT waddellscott drosophilalearnopposingcomponentsofacompoundfoodstimulus |