Cargando…

Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length

AIM: To evaluate and compare the predictive capacity of four intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and Haigis) in eyes shorter than 22.0 mm. SETTING AND DESIGN: Observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants in our study were 69 consecutive patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moschos, Marilita M., Chatziralli, Irini P, Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25005197
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.129791
_version_ 1782330442993631232
author Moschos, Marilita M.
Chatziralli, Irini P
Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi
author_facet Moschos, Marilita M.
Chatziralli, Irini P
Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi
author_sort Moschos, Marilita M.
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate and compare the predictive capacity of four intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and Haigis) in eyes shorter than 22.0 mm. SETTING AND DESIGN: Observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants in our study were 69 consecutive patients with a preoperative axial length (AL) of less than 22.0 mm in one or both eyes. All patients underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation and postoperative target of refraction was analyzed. Specifically, the differences in the mean absolute estimation error (AE) for the four formulas were analyzed. Furthermore, the percentage of eyes with AE within ±0.5 and ±1.0 D for each formula was estimated, as well as the correlation coefficient (r) between the AL and estimation error (E) for each formula. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences in the AEs of the formulas. A statistically significant difference was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: The Haigis formula had statistically significant smaller mean AE in comparison to Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T. The Haigis formula predicted more eyes with E within ±0.5 and ±1.0 D of predicted spherical equivalent compared to other formulas. Correlation between AL and AE revealed a negative r value and P < 0.05 for all formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Haigis formula provides more accurate results concerning the postoperative target of refraction in eyes with AL less than 22.0 mm. Hoffer Q could be also used as an alternative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4131320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41313202014-08-14 Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length Moschos, Marilita M. Chatziralli, Irini P Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article AIM: To evaluate and compare the predictive capacity of four intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and Haigis) in eyes shorter than 22.0 mm. SETTING AND DESIGN: Observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants in our study were 69 consecutive patients with a preoperative axial length (AL) of less than 22.0 mm in one or both eyes. All patients underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation and postoperative target of refraction was analyzed. Specifically, the differences in the mean absolute estimation error (AE) for the four formulas were analyzed. Furthermore, the percentage of eyes with AE within ±0.5 and ±1.0 D for each formula was estimated, as well as the correlation coefficient (r) between the AL and estimation error (E) for each formula. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences in the AEs of the formulas. A statistically significant difference was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: The Haigis formula had statistically significant smaller mean AE in comparison to Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T. The Haigis formula predicted more eyes with E within ±0.5 and ±1.0 D of predicted spherical equivalent compared to other formulas. Correlation between AL and AE revealed a negative r value and P < 0.05 for all formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Haigis formula provides more accurate results concerning the postoperative target of refraction in eyes with AL less than 22.0 mm. Hoffer Q could be also used as an alternative. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4131320/ /pubmed/25005197 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.129791 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Moschos, Marilita M.
Chatziralli, Irini P
Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi
Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length
title Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length
title_full Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length
title_fullStr Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length
title_full_unstemmed Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length
title_short Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length
title_sort intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25005197
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.129791
work_keys_str_mv AT moschosmarilitam intraocularlenspowercalculationineyeswithshortaxiallength
AT chatziralliirinip intraocularlenspowercalculationineyeswithshortaxiallength
AT koutsandreachryssanthi intraocularlenspowercalculationineyeswithshortaxiallength