Cargando…
Returning findings within longitudinal cohort studies: the 1958 birth cohort as an exemplar
Population-based, prospective longitudinal cohort studies are considering the issues surrounding returning findings to individuals as a result of genomic and other medical research studies. While guidance is being developed for clinical settings, the process is less clear for those conducting longit...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25126104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-11-10 |
_version_ | 1782330514191941632 |
---|---|
author | Wallace, Susan E Walker, Neil M Elliott, Jane |
author_facet | Wallace, Susan E Walker, Neil M Elliott, Jane |
author_sort | Wallace, Susan E |
collection | PubMed |
description | Population-based, prospective longitudinal cohort studies are considering the issues surrounding returning findings to individuals as a result of genomic and other medical research studies. While guidance is being developed for clinical settings, the process is less clear for those conducting longitudinal research. This paper discusses work conducted on behalf of The UK Cohort and Longitudinal Study Enhancement Resource programme (CLOSER) to examine consent requirements, process considerations and specific examples of potential findings in the context of the 1958 British Birth cohort. Beyond deciding which findings to return, there are questions of whether re-consent is needed and the possible impact on the study, how the feedback process will be managed, and what resources are needed to support that process. Recommendations are made for actions a cohort study should consider taking when making vital decisions regarding returning findings. Any decisions need to be context-specific, arrived at transparently, communicated clearly, and in the best interests of both the participants and the study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4131774 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41317742014-08-15 Returning findings within longitudinal cohort studies: the 1958 birth cohort as an exemplar Wallace, Susan E Walker, Neil M Elliott, Jane Emerg Themes Epidemiol Analytic Perspective Population-based, prospective longitudinal cohort studies are considering the issues surrounding returning findings to individuals as a result of genomic and other medical research studies. While guidance is being developed for clinical settings, the process is less clear for those conducting longitudinal research. This paper discusses work conducted on behalf of The UK Cohort and Longitudinal Study Enhancement Resource programme (CLOSER) to examine consent requirements, process considerations and specific examples of potential findings in the context of the 1958 British Birth cohort. Beyond deciding which findings to return, there are questions of whether re-consent is needed and the possible impact on the study, how the feedback process will be managed, and what resources are needed to support that process. Recommendations are made for actions a cohort study should consider taking when making vital decisions regarding returning findings. Any decisions need to be context-specific, arrived at transparently, communicated clearly, and in the best interests of both the participants and the study. BioMed Central 2014-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4131774/ /pubmed/25126104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-11-10 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wallace et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Analytic Perspective Wallace, Susan E Walker, Neil M Elliott, Jane Returning findings within longitudinal cohort studies: the 1958 birth cohort as an exemplar |
title | Returning findings within longitudinal cohort studies: the 1958 birth cohort as an exemplar |
title_full | Returning findings within longitudinal cohort studies: the 1958 birth cohort as an exemplar |
title_fullStr | Returning findings within longitudinal cohort studies: the 1958 birth cohort as an exemplar |
title_full_unstemmed | Returning findings within longitudinal cohort studies: the 1958 birth cohort as an exemplar |
title_short | Returning findings within longitudinal cohort studies: the 1958 birth cohort as an exemplar |
title_sort | returning findings within longitudinal cohort studies: the 1958 birth cohort as an exemplar |
topic | Analytic Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25126104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-11-10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wallacesusane returningfindingswithinlongitudinalcohortstudiesthe1958birthcohortasanexemplar AT walkerneilm returningfindingswithinlongitudinalcohortstudiesthe1958birthcohortasanexemplar AT elliottjane returningfindingswithinlongitudinalcohortstudiesthe1958birthcohortasanexemplar |