Cargando…

From spatial ecology to spatial epidemiology: modeling spatial distributions of different cancer types with principal coordinates of neighbor matrices

BACKGROUND: Epidemiology and ecology share many fundamental research questions. Here we describe how principal coordinates of neighbor matrices (PCNM), a method from spatial ecology, can be applied to spatial epidemiology. PCNM is based on geographical distances among sites and can be applied to any...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voutilainen, Ari, Tolppanen, Anna-Maija, Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Katri, Sherwood, Paula R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25126105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-11-11
_version_ 1782330520977276928
author Voutilainen, Ari
Tolppanen, Anna-Maija
Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Katri
Sherwood, Paula R
author_facet Voutilainen, Ari
Tolppanen, Anna-Maija
Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Katri
Sherwood, Paula R
author_sort Voutilainen, Ari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epidemiology and ecology share many fundamental research questions. Here we describe how principal coordinates of neighbor matrices (PCNM), a method from spatial ecology, can be applied to spatial epidemiology. PCNM is based on geographical distances among sites and can be applied to any set of sites providing a good coverage of a study area. In the present study, PCNM eigenvectors corresponding to positive autocorrelation were used as explanatory variables in linear regressions to model incidences of eight most common cancer types in Finnish municipalities (n = 320). The dataset was provided by the Finnish Cancer Registry and it included altogether 615,839 cases between 1953 and 2010. RESULTS: PCNM resulted in 165 vectors with a positive eigenvalue. The first PCNM vector corresponded to the wavelength of hundreds of kilometers as it contrasted two main subareas so that municipalities located in southwestern Finland had the highest positive site scores and those located in midwestern Finland had the highest negative scores in that vector. Correspondingly, the 165(th) PCNM vector indicated variation mainly between the two small municipalities located in South Finland. The vectors explained 13 - 58% of the spatial variation in cancer incidences. The number of outliers having standardized residual > |3| was very low, one to six per model, and even lower, zero to two per model, according to Chauvenet’s criterion. The spatial variation of prostate cancer was best captured (adjusted r(2) = 0.579). CONCLUSIONS: PCNM can act as a complementary method to causal modeling to achieve a better understanding of the spatial structure of both the response and explanatory variables, and to assess the spatial importance of unmeasured explanatory factors. PCNM vectors can be used as proxies for demographics and causative agents to deal with autocorrelation, multicollinearity, and confounding variables. PCNM may help to extend spatial epidemiology to areas with limited availability of registers, improve cost-effectiveness, and aid in identifying unknown causative agents, and predict future trends in disease distributions and incidences. A large advantage of using PCNM is that it can create statistically valid reflectors of real predictors for disease incidence models with only little resources and background information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4131804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41318042014-08-15 From spatial ecology to spatial epidemiology: modeling spatial distributions of different cancer types with principal coordinates of neighbor matrices Voutilainen, Ari Tolppanen, Anna-Maija Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Katri Sherwood, Paula R Emerg Themes Epidemiol Methodology BACKGROUND: Epidemiology and ecology share many fundamental research questions. Here we describe how principal coordinates of neighbor matrices (PCNM), a method from spatial ecology, can be applied to spatial epidemiology. PCNM is based on geographical distances among sites and can be applied to any set of sites providing a good coverage of a study area. In the present study, PCNM eigenvectors corresponding to positive autocorrelation were used as explanatory variables in linear regressions to model incidences of eight most common cancer types in Finnish municipalities (n = 320). The dataset was provided by the Finnish Cancer Registry and it included altogether 615,839 cases between 1953 and 2010. RESULTS: PCNM resulted in 165 vectors with a positive eigenvalue. The first PCNM vector corresponded to the wavelength of hundreds of kilometers as it contrasted two main subareas so that municipalities located in southwestern Finland had the highest positive site scores and those located in midwestern Finland had the highest negative scores in that vector. Correspondingly, the 165(th) PCNM vector indicated variation mainly between the two small municipalities located in South Finland. The vectors explained 13 - 58% of the spatial variation in cancer incidences. The number of outliers having standardized residual > |3| was very low, one to six per model, and even lower, zero to two per model, according to Chauvenet’s criterion. The spatial variation of prostate cancer was best captured (adjusted r(2) = 0.579). CONCLUSIONS: PCNM can act as a complementary method to causal modeling to achieve a better understanding of the spatial structure of both the response and explanatory variables, and to assess the spatial importance of unmeasured explanatory factors. PCNM vectors can be used as proxies for demographics and causative agents to deal with autocorrelation, multicollinearity, and confounding variables. PCNM may help to extend spatial epidemiology to areas with limited availability of registers, improve cost-effectiveness, and aid in identifying unknown causative agents, and predict future trends in disease distributions and incidences. A large advantage of using PCNM is that it can create statistically valid reflectors of real predictors for disease incidence models with only little resources and background information. BioMed Central 2014-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4131804/ /pubmed/25126105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-11-11 Text en Copyright © 2014 Voutilainen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Voutilainen, Ari
Tolppanen, Anna-Maija
Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Katri
Sherwood, Paula R
From spatial ecology to spatial epidemiology: modeling spatial distributions of different cancer types with principal coordinates of neighbor matrices
title From spatial ecology to spatial epidemiology: modeling spatial distributions of different cancer types with principal coordinates of neighbor matrices
title_full From spatial ecology to spatial epidemiology: modeling spatial distributions of different cancer types with principal coordinates of neighbor matrices
title_fullStr From spatial ecology to spatial epidemiology: modeling spatial distributions of different cancer types with principal coordinates of neighbor matrices
title_full_unstemmed From spatial ecology to spatial epidemiology: modeling spatial distributions of different cancer types with principal coordinates of neighbor matrices
title_short From spatial ecology to spatial epidemiology: modeling spatial distributions of different cancer types with principal coordinates of neighbor matrices
title_sort from spatial ecology to spatial epidemiology: modeling spatial distributions of different cancer types with principal coordinates of neighbor matrices
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25126105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-11-11
work_keys_str_mv AT voutilainenari fromspatialecologytospatialepidemiologymodelingspatialdistributionsofdifferentcancertypeswithprincipalcoordinatesofneighbormatrices
AT tolppanenannamaija fromspatialecologytospatialepidemiologymodelingspatialdistributionsofdifferentcancertypeswithprincipalcoordinatesofneighbormatrices
AT vehvilainenjulkunenkatri fromspatialecologytospatialepidemiologymodelingspatialdistributionsofdifferentcancertypeswithprincipalcoordinatesofneighbormatrices
AT sherwoodpaular fromspatialecologytospatialepidemiologymodelingspatialdistributionsofdifferentcancertypeswithprincipalcoordinatesofneighbormatrices