Cargando…

Impact of Supplementary Feeding on Reproductive Success of White Storks

European white stork (Ciconia ciconia) populations have been object to several conservation measures such as reintroduction programs, habitat improvement or supplementary feeding in the last decades. Although recent white stork censuses revealed an upward trend of most of the western populations, ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hilgartner, Roland, Stahl, Daniel, Zinner, Dietmar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25119566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104276
_version_ 1782330571821678592
author Hilgartner, Roland
Stahl, Daniel
Zinner, Dietmar
author_facet Hilgartner, Roland
Stahl, Daniel
Zinner, Dietmar
author_sort Hilgartner, Roland
collection PubMed
description European white stork (Ciconia ciconia) populations have been object to several conservation measures such as reintroduction programs, habitat improvement or supplementary feeding in the last decades. Although recent white stork censuses revealed an upward trend of most of the western populations, evaluations of the relative importance of certain conservation measures are still scarce or even lacking. In our study we analyzed the effect of supplementary feeding on the reproductive success of white storks in conjunction with other factors such as weather or nest site characteristics. We present data of 569 breeding events at 80 different nest sites located in variable distances to an artificial feeding site at Affenberg Salem (south-western Germany) collected from 1990–2012. A multilevel Poisson regression revealed that in our study population (1) reproductive success was negatively affected by monthly precipitation in April, May and June, (2) pairs breeding on power poles had a lower reproductive success than pairs breeding on platforms or trees and (3) reproductive success was significantly higher in pairs breeding in close distance to the feeding site. The number of fledglings per nest decreased by 8% per kilometer distance to the feeding site. Our data suggest that supplementary feeding increases fledgling populations which may be a tool to attenuate population losses caused by factors such as habitat deterioration or unfavorable conditions in wintering habitats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4132114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41321142014-08-19 Impact of Supplementary Feeding on Reproductive Success of White Storks Hilgartner, Roland Stahl, Daniel Zinner, Dietmar PLoS One Research Article European white stork (Ciconia ciconia) populations have been object to several conservation measures such as reintroduction programs, habitat improvement or supplementary feeding in the last decades. Although recent white stork censuses revealed an upward trend of most of the western populations, evaluations of the relative importance of certain conservation measures are still scarce or even lacking. In our study we analyzed the effect of supplementary feeding on the reproductive success of white storks in conjunction with other factors such as weather or nest site characteristics. We present data of 569 breeding events at 80 different nest sites located in variable distances to an artificial feeding site at Affenberg Salem (south-western Germany) collected from 1990–2012. A multilevel Poisson regression revealed that in our study population (1) reproductive success was negatively affected by monthly precipitation in April, May and June, (2) pairs breeding on power poles had a lower reproductive success than pairs breeding on platforms or trees and (3) reproductive success was significantly higher in pairs breeding in close distance to the feeding site. The number of fledglings per nest decreased by 8% per kilometer distance to the feeding site. Our data suggest that supplementary feeding increases fledgling populations which may be a tool to attenuate population losses caused by factors such as habitat deterioration or unfavorable conditions in wintering habitats. Public Library of Science 2014-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4132114/ /pubmed/25119566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104276 Text en © 2014 Hilgartner et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hilgartner, Roland
Stahl, Daniel
Zinner, Dietmar
Impact of Supplementary Feeding on Reproductive Success of White Storks
title Impact of Supplementary Feeding on Reproductive Success of White Storks
title_full Impact of Supplementary Feeding on Reproductive Success of White Storks
title_fullStr Impact of Supplementary Feeding on Reproductive Success of White Storks
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Supplementary Feeding on Reproductive Success of White Storks
title_short Impact of Supplementary Feeding on Reproductive Success of White Storks
title_sort impact of supplementary feeding on reproductive success of white storks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25119566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104276
work_keys_str_mv AT hilgartnerroland impactofsupplementaryfeedingonreproductivesuccessofwhitestorks
AT stahldaniel impactofsupplementaryfeedingonreproductivesuccessofwhitestorks
AT zinnerdietmar impactofsupplementaryfeedingonreproductivesuccessofwhitestorks