Cargando…

The effectiveness of combined bracing and exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on SRS and SOSORT criteria: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: Recently an RCT confirmed brace efficacy in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. Previously, a Cochrane review suggested also producing studies according to the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) criteria on the effectiveness of bracing for AIS. Even if the SRS criteria propose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Negrini, Stefano, Donzelli, Sabrina, Lusini, Monia, Minnella, Salvatore, Zaina, Fabio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25095800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-263
_version_ 1782330577897127936
author Negrini, Stefano
Donzelli, Sabrina
Lusini, Monia
Minnella, Salvatore
Zaina, Fabio
author_facet Negrini, Stefano
Donzelli, Sabrina
Lusini, Monia
Minnella, Salvatore
Zaina, Fabio
author_sort Negrini, Stefano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently an RCT confirmed brace efficacy in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. Previously, a Cochrane review suggested also producing studies according to the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) criteria on the effectiveness of bracing for AIS. Even if the SRS criteria propose a prospective design, until now only one out of 6 published studies was prospective. Our purpose was to evaluate the effects of bracing plus exercises following the SRS and the international Society on Scoliosis Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) criteria for AIS conservative treatment. METHODS: Study design/setting: prospective cohort study nested in a clinical database of all outpatients of a clinic specialized in scoliosis conservative treatment. Patient sample: seventy-three patients (60 females), age 12 years 10 months ±17 months, 34.4±4.4 Cobb degrees, who satisfied SRS criteria were included out of 3,883 patients at first evaluation. Outcome measures: Cobb angle at the end of treatment according to SRS criteria : (unchanged; worsened 6° or more, over 45° and surgically treated, and rate of improvement of 6° or more). Braces were prescribed for 18–23 hours/day according to curves magnitude and actual international guidelines. Weaning was gradual after Risser 3. All patients performed exercises and were managed according to SOSORT criteria. Results in all patients were analyzed according to intent-to-treat at the end of the treatment. Funding and Conflict of Interest: no. RESULTS: Overall 34 patients (52.3%) improved. Seven patients (9.6%) worsened, of which 1 patient progressed beyond 45° and was fused. Referred compliance was assessed during a mean period of 3 years 4 months ±20 months; the median adherence was 99.1% (range 22.2-109.2%). Employing intent-to-treat analysis, there were failures in 11 patients (15.1%). At start, these patients had statistically significant low BMI and kyphosis, high thoracic rotation and higher Cobb angles. Drop-outs showed reduced compliance and years of treatment; their average scoliosis at discontinuation was low: 22.7° (range 16-35°) at Risser 1.3 ± 1. CONCLUSIONS: Bracing in patients with AIS who satisfy SRS criteria is effective. Combining bracing with exercise according to SOSORT criteria shows better results than the current literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4132192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41321922014-08-15 The effectiveness of combined bracing and exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on SRS and SOSORT criteria: a prospective study Negrini, Stefano Donzelli, Sabrina Lusini, Monia Minnella, Salvatore Zaina, Fabio BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Recently an RCT confirmed brace efficacy in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. Previously, a Cochrane review suggested also producing studies according to the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) criteria on the effectiveness of bracing for AIS. Even if the SRS criteria propose a prospective design, until now only one out of 6 published studies was prospective. Our purpose was to evaluate the effects of bracing plus exercises following the SRS and the international Society on Scoliosis Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) criteria for AIS conservative treatment. METHODS: Study design/setting: prospective cohort study nested in a clinical database of all outpatients of a clinic specialized in scoliosis conservative treatment. Patient sample: seventy-three patients (60 females), age 12 years 10 months ±17 months, 34.4±4.4 Cobb degrees, who satisfied SRS criteria were included out of 3,883 patients at first evaluation. Outcome measures: Cobb angle at the end of treatment according to SRS criteria : (unchanged; worsened 6° or more, over 45° and surgically treated, and rate of improvement of 6° or more). Braces were prescribed for 18–23 hours/day according to curves magnitude and actual international guidelines. Weaning was gradual after Risser 3. All patients performed exercises and were managed according to SOSORT criteria. Results in all patients were analyzed according to intent-to-treat at the end of the treatment. Funding and Conflict of Interest: no. RESULTS: Overall 34 patients (52.3%) improved. Seven patients (9.6%) worsened, of which 1 patient progressed beyond 45° and was fused. Referred compliance was assessed during a mean period of 3 years 4 months ±20 months; the median adherence was 99.1% (range 22.2-109.2%). Employing intent-to-treat analysis, there were failures in 11 patients (15.1%). At start, these patients had statistically significant low BMI and kyphosis, high thoracic rotation and higher Cobb angles. Drop-outs showed reduced compliance and years of treatment; their average scoliosis at discontinuation was low: 22.7° (range 16-35°) at Risser 1.3 ± 1. CONCLUSIONS: Bracing in patients with AIS who satisfy SRS criteria is effective. Combining bracing with exercise according to SOSORT criteria shows better results than the current literature. BioMed Central 2014-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4132192/ /pubmed/25095800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-263 Text en Copyright © 2014 Negrini et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Negrini, Stefano
Donzelli, Sabrina
Lusini, Monia
Minnella, Salvatore
Zaina, Fabio
The effectiveness of combined bracing and exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on SRS and SOSORT criteria: a prospective study
title The effectiveness of combined bracing and exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on SRS and SOSORT criteria: a prospective study
title_full The effectiveness of combined bracing and exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on SRS and SOSORT criteria: a prospective study
title_fullStr The effectiveness of combined bracing and exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on SRS and SOSORT criteria: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of combined bracing and exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on SRS and SOSORT criteria: a prospective study
title_short The effectiveness of combined bracing and exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on SRS and SOSORT criteria: a prospective study
title_sort effectiveness of combined bracing and exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on srs and sosort criteria: a prospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25095800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-263
work_keys_str_mv AT negrinistefano theeffectivenessofcombinedbracingandexerciseinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisbasedonsrsandsosortcriteriaaprospectivestudy
AT donzellisabrina theeffectivenessofcombinedbracingandexerciseinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisbasedonsrsandsosortcriteriaaprospectivestudy
AT lusinimonia theeffectivenessofcombinedbracingandexerciseinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisbasedonsrsandsosortcriteriaaprospectivestudy
AT minnellasalvatore theeffectivenessofcombinedbracingandexerciseinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisbasedonsrsandsosortcriteriaaprospectivestudy
AT zainafabio theeffectivenessofcombinedbracingandexerciseinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisbasedonsrsandsosortcriteriaaprospectivestudy
AT negrinistefano effectivenessofcombinedbracingandexerciseinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisbasedonsrsandsosortcriteriaaprospectivestudy
AT donzellisabrina effectivenessofcombinedbracingandexerciseinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisbasedonsrsandsosortcriteriaaprospectivestudy
AT lusinimonia effectivenessofcombinedbracingandexerciseinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisbasedonsrsandsosortcriteriaaprospectivestudy
AT minnellasalvatore effectivenessofcombinedbracingandexerciseinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisbasedonsrsandsosortcriteriaaprospectivestudy
AT zainafabio effectivenessofcombinedbracingandexerciseinadolescentidiopathicscoliosisbasedonsrsandsosortcriteriaaprospectivestudy