Cargando…
Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration
BACKGROUND: Vasopressin administration has been tested in cardiac arrest. However it has not been tested when cardiac arrest occurs in certain circumstances, as in sepsis, where it may have a major role. The aim of the study was to investigate survival after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25090998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-492 |
_version_ | 1782330587372060672 |
---|---|
author | Loukas, Thomas Vasileiadis, Ioannis Anastasiou, Helen Karatzanos, Eleftherios Gerovasili, Vasiliki Nana, Emmeleia Tzanis, Giorgos Nanas, Serafim |
author_facet | Loukas, Thomas Vasileiadis, Ioannis Anastasiou, Helen Karatzanos, Eleftherios Gerovasili, Vasiliki Nana, Emmeleia Tzanis, Giorgos Nanas, Serafim |
author_sort | Loukas, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vasopressin administration has been tested in cardiac arrest. However it has not been tested when cardiac arrest occurs in certain circumstances, as in sepsis, where it may have a major role. The aim of the study was to investigate survival after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model compared with healthy animals and to explore the effectiveness of adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration. METHODS: Thirty five healthy piglets of both genders were studied. The piglets were randomly assigned into three groups: group A (n = 8), group B (n = 14), group C (n = 13). Animals of groups B and C were given endotoxin to mimic a septic state before arrest. We applied the same resuscitation protocol to all pigs but we replaced the first dose of epinephrine with vasopressin in pigs of group C. Following surgical preparation and 30 min resting period, baseline measurements were recorded. In order to assess tissue oxygenation, we implemented Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) with the vascular occlusion technique (VOT) in thirteen lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated animals, occluding abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava. Afterwards, LPS (100 μg/kg) was infused in a 30 min period to animals of groups B and C and normal saline to group A. New NIRS measurements were obtained again. Subsequently, we provoked ventricular fibrillation (VF). After 3 min of untreated VF, open chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed manually. Primary end point was the restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). RESULTS: The chance of ROSC for the groups A, B and C was 75%, 35.7%, and 30.7% respectively. A significant difference in ROSC was established between septic (group B + C) and non septic piglets (group A) (P = 0.046). Vasopressin administration had no effect in outcome. LPS administration decreased oxygen consumption rate, as assessed by NIRS, in peripheral tissues (22.6 ± 7.2. vs 18.5 ± 7.2, P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Septic piglets have fewer chances to survive after cardiac arrest. No difference in outcome was observed when the first dose of epinephrine was replaced with vasopressin to treat cardiac arrest in the LPS-treated animals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4132240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41322402014-08-15 Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration Loukas, Thomas Vasileiadis, Ioannis Anastasiou, Helen Karatzanos, Eleftherios Gerovasili, Vasiliki Nana, Emmeleia Tzanis, Giorgos Nanas, Serafim BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Vasopressin administration has been tested in cardiac arrest. However it has not been tested when cardiac arrest occurs in certain circumstances, as in sepsis, where it may have a major role. The aim of the study was to investigate survival after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model compared with healthy animals and to explore the effectiveness of adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration. METHODS: Thirty five healthy piglets of both genders were studied. The piglets were randomly assigned into three groups: group A (n = 8), group B (n = 14), group C (n = 13). Animals of groups B and C were given endotoxin to mimic a septic state before arrest. We applied the same resuscitation protocol to all pigs but we replaced the first dose of epinephrine with vasopressin in pigs of group C. Following surgical preparation and 30 min resting period, baseline measurements were recorded. In order to assess tissue oxygenation, we implemented Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) with the vascular occlusion technique (VOT) in thirteen lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated animals, occluding abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava. Afterwards, LPS (100 μg/kg) was infused in a 30 min period to animals of groups B and C and normal saline to group A. New NIRS measurements were obtained again. Subsequently, we provoked ventricular fibrillation (VF). After 3 min of untreated VF, open chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed manually. Primary end point was the restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). RESULTS: The chance of ROSC for the groups A, B and C was 75%, 35.7%, and 30.7% respectively. A significant difference in ROSC was established between septic (group B + C) and non septic piglets (group A) (P = 0.046). Vasopressin administration had no effect in outcome. LPS administration decreased oxygen consumption rate, as assessed by NIRS, in peripheral tissues (22.6 ± 7.2. vs 18.5 ± 7.2, P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Septic piglets have fewer chances to survive after cardiac arrest. No difference in outcome was observed when the first dose of epinephrine was replaced with vasopressin to treat cardiac arrest in the LPS-treated animals. BioMed Central 2014-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4132240/ /pubmed/25090998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-492 Text en Copyright © 2014 Loukas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Loukas, Thomas Vasileiadis, Ioannis Anastasiou, Helen Karatzanos, Eleftherios Gerovasili, Vasiliki Nana, Emmeleia Tzanis, Giorgos Nanas, Serafim Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration |
title | Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration |
title_full | Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration |
title_fullStr | Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration |
title_full_unstemmed | Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration |
title_short | Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration |
title_sort | resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25090998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-492 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loukasthomas resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration AT vasileiadisioannis resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration AT anastasiouhelen resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration AT karatzanoseleftherios resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration AT gerovasilivasiliki resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration AT nanaemmeleia resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration AT tzanisgiorgos resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration AT nanasserafim resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration |