Cargando…

Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration

BACKGROUND: Vasopressin administration has been tested in cardiac arrest. However it has not been tested when cardiac arrest occurs in certain circumstances, as in sepsis, where it may have a major role. The aim of the study was to investigate survival after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loukas, Thomas, Vasileiadis, Ioannis, Anastasiou, Helen, Karatzanos, Eleftherios, Gerovasili, Vasiliki, Nana, Emmeleia, Tzanis, Giorgos, Nanas, Serafim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25090998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-492
_version_ 1782330587372060672
author Loukas, Thomas
Vasileiadis, Ioannis
Anastasiou, Helen
Karatzanos, Eleftherios
Gerovasili, Vasiliki
Nana, Emmeleia
Tzanis, Giorgos
Nanas, Serafim
author_facet Loukas, Thomas
Vasileiadis, Ioannis
Anastasiou, Helen
Karatzanos, Eleftherios
Gerovasili, Vasiliki
Nana, Emmeleia
Tzanis, Giorgos
Nanas, Serafim
author_sort Loukas, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vasopressin administration has been tested in cardiac arrest. However it has not been tested when cardiac arrest occurs in certain circumstances, as in sepsis, where it may have a major role. The aim of the study was to investigate survival after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model compared with healthy animals and to explore the effectiveness of adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration. METHODS: Thirty five healthy piglets of both genders were studied. The piglets were randomly assigned into three groups: group A (n = 8), group B (n = 14), group C (n = 13). Animals of groups B and C were given endotoxin to mimic a septic state before arrest. We applied the same resuscitation protocol to all pigs but we replaced the first dose of epinephrine with vasopressin in pigs of group C. Following surgical preparation and 30 min resting period, baseline measurements were recorded. In order to assess tissue oxygenation, we implemented Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) with the vascular occlusion technique (VOT) in thirteen lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated animals, occluding abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava. Afterwards, LPS (100 μg/kg) was infused in a 30 min period to animals of groups B and C and normal saline to group A. New NIRS measurements were obtained again. Subsequently, we provoked ventricular fibrillation (VF). After 3 min of untreated VF, open chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed manually. Primary end point was the restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). RESULTS: The chance of ROSC for the groups A, B and C was 75%, 35.7%, and 30.7% respectively. A significant difference in ROSC was established between septic (group B + C) and non septic piglets (group A) (P = 0.046). Vasopressin administration had no effect in outcome. LPS administration decreased oxygen consumption rate, as assessed by NIRS, in peripheral tissues (22.6 ± 7.2. vs 18.5 ± 7.2, P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Septic piglets have fewer chances to survive after cardiac arrest. No difference in outcome was observed when the first dose of epinephrine was replaced with vasopressin to treat cardiac arrest in the LPS-treated animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4132240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41322402014-08-15 Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration Loukas, Thomas Vasileiadis, Ioannis Anastasiou, Helen Karatzanos, Eleftherios Gerovasili, Vasiliki Nana, Emmeleia Tzanis, Giorgos Nanas, Serafim BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Vasopressin administration has been tested in cardiac arrest. However it has not been tested when cardiac arrest occurs in certain circumstances, as in sepsis, where it may have a major role. The aim of the study was to investigate survival after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model compared with healthy animals and to explore the effectiveness of adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration. METHODS: Thirty five healthy piglets of both genders were studied. The piglets were randomly assigned into three groups: group A (n = 8), group B (n = 14), group C (n = 13). Animals of groups B and C were given endotoxin to mimic a septic state before arrest. We applied the same resuscitation protocol to all pigs but we replaced the first dose of epinephrine with vasopressin in pigs of group C. Following surgical preparation and 30 min resting period, baseline measurements were recorded. In order to assess tissue oxygenation, we implemented Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) with the vascular occlusion technique (VOT) in thirteen lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated animals, occluding abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava. Afterwards, LPS (100 μg/kg) was infused in a 30 min period to animals of groups B and C and normal saline to group A. New NIRS measurements were obtained again. Subsequently, we provoked ventricular fibrillation (VF). After 3 min of untreated VF, open chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed manually. Primary end point was the restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). RESULTS: The chance of ROSC for the groups A, B and C was 75%, 35.7%, and 30.7% respectively. A significant difference in ROSC was established between septic (group B + C) and non septic piglets (group A) (P = 0.046). Vasopressin administration had no effect in outcome. LPS administration decreased oxygen consumption rate, as assessed by NIRS, in peripheral tissues (22.6 ± 7.2. vs 18.5 ± 7.2, P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Septic piglets have fewer chances to survive after cardiac arrest. No difference in outcome was observed when the first dose of epinephrine was replaced with vasopressin to treat cardiac arrest in the LPS-treated animals. BioMed Central 2014-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4132240/ /pubmed/25090998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-492 Text en Copyright © 2014 Loukas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Loukas, Thomas
Vasileiadis, Ioannis
Anastasiou, Helen
Karatzanos, Eleftherios
Gerovasili, Vasiliki
Nana, Emmeleia
Tzanis, Giorgos
Nanas, Serafim
Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration
title Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration
title_full Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration
title_fullStr Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration
title_full_unstemmed Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration
title_short Resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration
title_sort resuscitation after cardiac arrest in a septic porcine model: adding vasopressin vs epinephrine alone administration
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25090998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-492
work_keys_str_mv AT loukasthomas resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration
AT vasileiadisioannis resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration
AT anastasiouhelen resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration
AT karatzanoseleftherios resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration
AT gerovasilivasiliki resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration
AT nanaemmeleia resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration
AT tzanisgiorgos resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration
AT nanasserafim resuscitationaftercardiacarrestinasepticporcinemodeladdingvasopressinvsepinephrinealoneadministration