Cargando…

Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine factors that could help reduce primary perforation during insertion of a framed intrauterine device (IUD) and to determine factors that contribute in generating enough uterine muscle force to cause embedment and secondary perforation of an IUD. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldstuck, Norman D, Wildemeersch, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143756
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S63167
_version_ 1782330589935828992
author Goldstuck, Norman D
Wildemeersch, Dirk
author_facet Goldstuck, Norman D
Wildemeersch, Dirk
author_sort Goldstuck, Norman D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine factors that could help reduce primary perforation during insertion of a framed intrauterine device (IUD) and to determine factors that contribute in generating enough uterine muscle force to cause embedment and secondary perforation of an IUD. The objective was also to evaluate the main underlying mechanism of IUD expulsion. METHODS: We compared known IUD insertion forces for “framed” devices with known perforation forces in vitro (hysterectomy specimens) and known IUD removal forces and calculated a range of possible intrauterine forces using pressure and surface area. These were compared with known perforation forces. RESULTS: IUD insertion forces range from 1.5 N to 6.5 N. Removal forces range from 1 N to 5.8 N and fracture forces from 8.7 N to 30 N depending upon device. Measured perforation forces are from 20 N to 54 N, and calculations show the uterus is capable of generating up to 50 N of myometrial force depending on internal pressure and surface area. CONCLUSION: Primary perforation with conventional framed IUDs may occur if the insertion pressure exceeds the perforation resistance of the uterine fundus. This is more likely to occur if the front end of the inserter/IUD is narrow, the passage through the cervix is difficult, and the procedure is complex. IUD embedment and secondary perforation and IUD expulsion may be due to imbalance between the size of the IUD and that of the uterine cavity, causing production of asymmetrical uterine forces. The uterine muscle seems capable of generating enough force to cause an IUD to perforate the myometrium provided it is applied asymmetrically. A physical theory for IUD expulsion and secondary IUD perforation is given.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4132253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41322532014-08-20 Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion Goldstuck, Norman D Wildemeersch, Dirk Int J Womens Health Expert Opinion BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine factors that could help reduce primary perforation during insertion of a framed intrauterine device (IUD) and to determine factors that contribute in generating enough uterine muscle force to cause embedment and secondary perforation of an IUD. The objective was also to evaluate the main underlying mechanism of IUD expulsion. METHODS: We compared known IUD insertion forces for “framed” devices with known perforation forces in vitro (hysterectomy specimens) and known IUD removal forces and calculated a range of possible intrauterine forces using pressure and surface area. These were compared with known perforation forces. RESULTS: IUD insertion forces range from 1.5 N to 6.5 N. Removal forces range from 1 N to 5.8 N and fracture forces from 8.7 N to 30 N depending upon device. Measured perforation forces are from 20 N to 54 N, and calculations show the uterus is capable of generating up to 50 N of myometrial force depending on internal pressure and surface area. CONCLUSION: Primary perforation with conventional framed IUDs may occur if the insertion pressure exceeds the perforation resistance of the uterine fundus. This is more likely to occur if the front end of the inserter/IUD is narrow, the passage through the cervix is difficult, and the procedure is complex. IUD embedment and secondary perforation and IUD expulsion may be due to imbalance between the size of the IUD and that of the uterine cavity, causing production of asymmetrical uterine forces. The uterine muscle seems capable of generating enough force to cause an IUD to perforate the myometrium provided it is applied asymmetrically. A physical theory for IUD expulsion and secondary IUD perforation is given. Dove Medical Press 2014-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4132253/ /pubmed/25143756 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S63167 Text en © 2014 Goldstuck and Wildemeersch. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Expert Opinion
Goldstuck, Norman D
Wildemeersch, Dirk
Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion
title Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion
title_full Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion
title_fullStr Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion
title_full_unstemmed Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion
title_short Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion
title_sort role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion
topic Expert Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143756
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S63167
work_keys_str_mv AT goldstucknormand roleofuterineforcesinintrauterinedeviceembedmentperforationandexpulsion
AT wildemeerschdirk roleofuterineforcesinintrauterinedeviceembedmentperforationandexpulsion