Cargando…
Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine factors that could help reduce primary perforation during insertion of a framed intrauterine device (IUD) and to determine factors that contribute in generating enough uterine muscle force to cause embedment and secondary perforation of an IUD. Th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143756 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S63167 |
_version_ | 1782330589935828992 |
---|---|
author | Goldstuck, Norman D Wildemeersch, Dirk |
author_facet | Goldstuck, Norman D Wildemeersch, Dirk |
author_sort | Goldstuck, Norman D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine factors that could help reduce primary perforation during insertion of a framed intrauterine device (IUD) and to determine factors that contribute in generating enough uterine muscle force to cause embedment and secondary perforation of an IUD. The objective was also to evaluate the main underlying mechanism of IUD expulsion. METHODS: We compared known IUD insertion forces for “framed” devices with known perforation forces in vitro (hysterectomy specimens) and known IUD removal forces and calculated a range of possible intrauterine forces using pressure and surface area. These were compared with known perforation forces. RESULTS: IUD insertion forces range from 1.5 N to 6.5 N. Removal forces range from 1 N to 5.8 N and fracture forces from 8.7 N to 30 N depending upon device. Measured perforation forces are from 20 N to 54 N, and calculations show the uterus is capable of generating up to 50 N of myometrial force depending on internal pressure and surface area. CONCLUSION: Primary perforation with conventional framed IUDs may occur if the insertion pressure exceeds the perforation resistance of the uterine fundus. This is more likely to occur if the front end of the inserter/IUD is narrow, the passage through the cervix is difficult, and the procedure is complex. IUD embedment and secondary perforation and IUD expulsion may be due to imbalance between the size of the IUD and that of the uterine cavity, causing production of asymmetrical uterine forces. The uterine muscle seems capable of generating enough force to cause an IUD to perforate the myometrium provided it is applied asymmetrically. A physical theory for IUD expulsion and secondary IUD perforation is given. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4132253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41322532014-08-20 Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion Goldstuck, Norman D Wildemeersch, Dirk Int J Womens Health Expert Opinion BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine factors that could help reduce primary perforation during insertion of a framed intrauterine device (IUD) and to determine factors that contribute in generating enough uterine muscle force to cause embedment and secondary perforation of an IUD. The objective was also to evaluate the main underlying mechanism of IUD expulsion. METHODS: We compared known IUD insertion forces for “framed” devices with known perforation forces in vitro (hysterectomy specimens) and known IUD removal forces and calculated a range of possible intrauterine forces using pressure and surface area. These were compared with known perforation forces. RESULTS: IUD insertion forces range from 1.5 N to 6.5 N. Removal forces range from 1 N to 5.8 N and fracture forces from 8.7 N to 30 N depending upon device. Measured perforation forces are from 20 N to 54 N, and calculations show the uterus is capable of generating up to 50 N of myometrial force depending on internal pressure and surface area. CONCLUSION: Primary perforation with conventional framed IUDs may occur if the insertion pressure exceeds the perforation resistance of the uterine fundus. This is more likely to occur if the front end of the inserter/IUD is narrow, the passage through the cervix is difficult, and the procedure is complex. IUD embedment and secondary perforation and IUD expulsion may be due to imbalance between the size of the IUD and that of the uterine cavity, causing production of asymmetrical uterine forces. The uterine muscle seems capable of generating enough force to cause an IUD to perforate the myometrium provided it is applied asymmetrically. A physical theory for IUD expulsion and secondary IUD perforation is given. Dove Medical Press 2014-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4132253/ /pubmed/25143756 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S63167 Text en © 2014 Goldstuck and Wildemeersch. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Expert Opinion Goldstuck, Norman D Wildemeersch, Dirk Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion |
title | Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion |
title_full | Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion |
title_fullStr | Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion |
title_short | Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion |
title_sort | role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion |
topic | Expert Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143756 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S63167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goldstucknormand roleofuterineforcesinintrauterinedeviceembedmentperforationandexpulsion AT wildemeerschdirk roleofuterineforcesinintrauterinedeviceembedmentperforationandexpulsion |