Cargando…

Metastatic penile carcinoma – an update on the current diagnosis and treatment options

INTRODUCTION: Penile carcinoma has an incidence of 4,000 cases in Europe. The therapy and prognosis depend decisively on the lymph node status. Lymph node metastases are detected in 23–65% cases depending on the histopathological pattern. Due to improved diagnostic methods an early detection of tumo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barski, Dimitri, Georgas, Evangelos, Gerullis, Holger, Ecke, Thorsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25140224
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.02.art2
_version_ 1782330648467341312
author Barski, Dimitri
Georgas, Evangelos
Gerullis, Holger
Ecke, Thorsten
author_facet Barski, Dimitri
Georgas, Evangelos
Gerullis, Holger
Ecke, Thorsten
author_sort Barski, Dimitri
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Penile carcinoma has an incidence of 4,000 cases in Europe. The therapy and prognosis depend decisively on the lymph node status. Lymph node metastases are detected in 23–65% cases depending on the histopathological pattern. Due to improved diagnostic methods an early detection of tumor stage is possible. Multimodal therapeutic concepts can offer curability for a subset of patients, even those suffering from advanced disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Current data on penile cancer based on a selective review of the literature by PubMed and the EAU guidelines 2009. RESULTS: Invasive diagnostic tools, such as fine–needle biopsy (FNB) and dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB), improved the diagnosis of lymph node status considerably and reduced the morbidity in specialized centers. The application of 18F–FDG–PET/CT for metastases detection needs further evaluation due to inconsistent results. Inguinal lymphadenectomy is the therapeutic standard in case of metastases proof. It was possible to reduce the complications due to the new modified operation techniques. Patients with extended lymph node and distant metastases have a poor prognosis. Different systemic polychemotherapy regimes are applied currently and are associated with poor outcome (response rates <50%) and high morbidity. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in patients with unresectable and relapsing lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, inconsistent therapy regimens are applied for metastatic penile cancer. Standardization is urgently needed through the development of high–quality studies and long–term registers in order to lower the morbidity and increase the efficiency of diagnosis and therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4132593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41325932014-08-19 Metastatic penile carcinoma – an update on the current diagnosis and treatment options Barski, Dimitri Georgas, Evangelos Gerullis, Holger Ecke, Thorsten Cent European J Urol Review Paper INTRODUCTION: Penile carcinoma has an incidence of 4,000 cases in Europe. The therapy and prognosis depend decisively on the lymph node status. Lymph node metastases are detected in 23–65% cases depending on the histopathological pattern. Due to improved diagnostic methods an early detection of tumor stage is possible. Multimodal therapeutic concepts can offer curability for a subset of patients, even those suffering from advanced disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Current data on penile cancer based on a selective review of the literature by PubMed and the EAU guidelines 2009. RESULTS: Invasive diagnostic tools, such as fine–needle biopsy (FNB) and dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB), improved the diagnosis of lymph node status considerably and reduced the morbidity in specialized centers. The application of 18F–FDG–PET/CT for metastases detection needs further evaluation due to inconsistent results. Inguinal lymphadenectomy is the therapeutic standard in case of metastases proof. It was possible to reduce the complications due to the new modified operation techniques. Patients with extended lymph node and distant metastases have a poor prognosis. Different systemic polychemotherapy regimes are applied currently and are associated with poor outcome (response rates <50%) and high morbidity. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in patients with unresectable and relapsing lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, inconsistent therapy regimens are applied for metastatic penile cancer. Standardization is urgently needed through the development of high–quality studies and long–term registers in order to lower the morbidity and increase the efficiency of diagnosis and therapy. Polish Urological Association 2014-06-23 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4132593/ /pubmed/25140224 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.02.art2 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Barski, Dimitri
Georgas, Evangelos
Gerullis, Holger
Ecke, Thorsten
Metastatic penile carcinoma – an update on the current diagnosis and treatment options
title Metastatic penile carcinoma – an update on the current diagnosis and treatment options
title_full Metastatic penile carcinoma – an update on the current diagnosis and treatment options
title_fullStr Metastatic penile carcinoma – an update on the current diagnosis and treatment options
title_full_unstemmed Metastatic penile carcinoma – an update on the current diagnosis and treatment options
title_short Metastatic penile carcinoma – an update on the current diagnosis and treatment options
title_sort metastatic penile carcinoma – an update on the current diagnosis and treatment options
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25140224
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.02.art2
work_keys_str_mv AT barskidimitri metastaticpenilecarcinomaanupdateonthecurrentdiagnosisandtreatmentoptions
AT georgasevangelos metastaticpenilecarcinomaanupdateonthecurrentdiagnosisandtreatmentoptions
AT gerullisholger metastaticpenilecarcinomaanupdateonthecurrentdiagnosisandtreatmentoptions
AT eckethorsten metastaticpenilecarcinomaanupdateonthecurrentdiagnosisandtreatmentoptions